The COVID-19 Pandemic and Quality of Life: Experiences Contributing to and Harming the Well-Being of Canadian Children and Adolescents.

Christine Gervais, Isabel Côté, Sophie Lampron-deSouza, Flavy Barrette, Sarah Tourigny, Tamarha Pierce, Vicky Lafantaisie
{"title":"The COVID-19 Pandemic and Quality of Life: Experiences Contributing to and Harming the Well-Being of Canadian Children and Adolescents.","authors":"Christine Gervais, Isabel Côté, Sophie Lampron-deSouza, Flavy Barrette, Sarah Tourigny, Tamarha Pierce, Vicky Lafantaisie","doi":"10.1007/s42448-022-00141-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pandemic's restrictive measures such as lockdowns, social distancing, and the wearing of masks transformed young people's daily lives and brought up major concerns regarding children's and adolescents' well-being. This longitudinal mixed study aims to identify how different experiences contributed to children's and adolescents' well-being through different stages of the pandemic. The sample comprises 149 Canadian youth from Quebec who shared their experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic. Children and adolescents were met virtually for semi-directed interviews about their well-being at three measurement time (T1: May 2020 lockdown, T2: July 2020 progressive reopening, and T3: beginning of the second wave). At T3, they also completed a questionnaire measuring their quality of life. Our findings indicated that 22% reported a low level of well-being (N: 32), 66% a normal level of well-being (N: 90), and 18% a high level of well-being (N: 27). The comparative thematic analysis of the discourse of these three groups allows us to identify experiences that are favorable and unfavorable to the well-being of young people and to distinguish two configurations of interactions between children and their environment over the first year of the pandemic, namely that of young people who report a high level of well-being and that of those who report a worrying level of well-being. Results highlight the importance of activities, relationships, support, and representations of children and adolescents for their well-being in the pandemic context. Interventions and social measures to better support their well-being are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":73485,"journal":{"name":"International journal on child maltreatment : research, policy and practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9734348/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal on child maltreatment : research, policy and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42448-022-00141-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pandemic's restrictive measures such as lockdowns, social distancing, and the wearing of masks transformed young people's daily lives and brought up major concerns regarding children's and adolescents' well-being. This longitudinal mixed study aims to identify how different experiences contributed to children's and adolescents' well-being through different stages of the pandemic. The sample comprises 149 Canadian youth from Quebec who shared their experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic. Children and adolescents were met virtually for semi-directed interviews about their well-being at three measurement time (T1: May 2020 lockdown, T2: July 2020 progressive reopening, and T3: beginning of the second wave). At T3, they also completed a questionnaire measuring their quality of life. Our findings indicated that 22% reported a low level of well-being (N: 32), 66% a normal level of well-being (N: 90), and 18% a high level of well-being (N: 27). The comparative thematic analysis of the discourse of these three groups allows us to identify experiences that are favorable and unfavorable to the well-being of young people and to distinguish two configurations of interactions between children and their environment over the first year of the pandemic, namely that of young people who report a high level of well-being and that of those who report a worrying level of well-being. Results highlight the importance of activities, relationships, support, and representations of children and adolescents for their well-being in the pandemic context. Interventions and social measures to better support their well-being are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行与生活质量:有助于和损害加拿大儿童和青少年福祉的经历。
大流行病的限制性措施,如封锁、社会疏远和戴口罩,改变了年轻人的日常生活,并引发了对儿童和青少年福祉的重大关切。这项纵向混合研究旨在确定在大流行病的不同阶段,不同的经历是如何影响儿童和青少年的幸福感的。样本包括 149 名来自魁北克的加拿大青少年,他们分享了自己在 COVID-19 大流行中的经历。在三个测量时间(T1:T1:2020 年 5 月封锁,T2:2020 年 7 月逐步重新开放,T3:第二波开始)。在 T3,他们还填写了一份生活质量调查问卷。我们的调查结果显示,22% 的人表示幸福感较低(32 人),66% 的人表示幸福感正常(90 人),18% 的人表示幸福感较高(27 人)。通过对这三个群体的话语进行比较专题分析,我们可以找出对青少年幸福感有利和不利的经历,并区分出大流行病第一年中儿童与其环境之间互动的两种配置,即报告幸福感高的青少年和报告幸福感令人担忧的青少年的配置。研究结果凸显了在大流行病背景下,儿童和青少年的活动、关系、支持和表象对其幸福感的重要性。讨论了更好地支持他们福祉的干预措施和社会措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Neighborhood Caregivers’ Recommendations to a Family in Need: Patterns of Assistance Across Different Family Needs Correction to: Primary Care and Behavioral Health Services Use Differ Among Medicaid-Enrolled Children by Initial Foster Care Entry Status “You Only Know Me by Reports”: a Therapeutic Approach to Social Reports Examining the Moderating Effects of Therapy Attendance on Prenatal Parenting Attitudes Among IPV-Exposed Mothers with Histories of Child Maltreatment An Assessment of Trends in Parenting and Child Outcomes in a Rural South African Community and Consequent Intervention Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1