Has the pandemic changed the test quality of the pulmonary function test laboratory?

IF 0.7 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Tuberkuloz ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thorax Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.5578/tt.20229607
Dorina Esendağlı, Eylem Gül, Aylin Özsancak, Şule Akçay, Gaye Ulubay
{"title":"Has the pandemic changed the test quality of the pulmonary function test laboratory?","authors":"Dorina Esendağlı,&nbsp;Eylem Gül,&nbsp;Aylin Özsancak,&nbsp;Şule Akçay,&nbsp;Gaye Ulubay","doi":"10.5578/tt.20229607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pulmonary function tests are used in the evaluation of the respiratory system. Maneuvers during spirometry can create aerosols and spread viruses such as SARS-CoV-2. Measures due to the pandemic can negatively affect both the number and the quality of the spirometry tests. There are no comparative studies on this subject.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The tests conducted in the spirometry laboratory between November 2019 and November 2021 were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Four hundred forty patients were included in the study. 50.5% of the patients were male and the mean age was 61.8 ± 16.5 years. The age, gender, height, and weight of the patients were similar. 75.2% (331) of the tests were evaluated as successful. The most common errors in tests were early termination (84.1%), uncooperative patients (29%), and poor effort (22.4%). The types of errors were not different between the two periods. The median number of tests performed for each patient was six. The total number of spirometry tests performed were 262 and 178 for 2019 and 2021 (p= 0.011), but test success remained unchanged over the years (p= 0.513). There was no significant difference between the three operators and the test success (p= 0.909), which was similar for both periods. However, the number of tests performed until the successful maneuver varied significantly (p= 0.009), and fewer maneuvers were required before the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to this study, the measures taken during the pandemic did not affect the quality of spirometry, but they did lead to more tests being done up until the successful maneuver was performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":45521,"journal":{"name":"Tuberkuloz ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thorax","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberkuloz ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thorax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5578/tt.20229607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pulmonary function tests are used in the evaluation of the respiratory system. Maneuvers during spirometry can create aerosols and spread viruses such as SARS-CoV-2. Measures due to the pandemic can negatively affect both the number and the quality of the spirometry tests. There are no comparative studies on this subject.

Materials and methods: The tests conducted in the spirometry laboratory between November 2019 and November 2021 were evaluated.

Result: Four hundred forty patients were included in the study. 50.5% of the patients were male and the mean age was 61.8 ± 16.5 years. The age, gender, height, and weight of the patients were similar. 75.2% (331) of the tests were evaluated as successful. The most common errors in tests were early termination (84.1%), uncooperative patients (29%), and poor effort (22.4%). The types of errors were not different between the two periods. The median number of tests performed for each patient was six. The total number of spirometry tests performed were 262 and 178 for 2019 and 2021 (p= 0.011), but test success remained unchanged over the years (p= 0.513). There was no significant difference between the three operators and the test success (p= 0.909), which was similar for both periods. However, the number of tests performed until the successful maneuver varied significantly (p= 0.009), and fewer maneuvers were required before the pandemic.

Conclusions: According to this study, the measures taken during the pandemic did not affect the quality of spirometry, but they did lead to more tests being done up until the successful maneuver was performed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疫情是否改变了肺功能检测实验室的检测质量?
肺功能检查用于评估呼吸系统。肺活量测定期间的动作会产生气溶胶并传播SARS-CoV-2等病毒。因大流行而采取的措施可能对肺活量测定法检测的数量和质量产生负面影响。在这个问题上没有比较研究。材料与方法:对2019年11月至2021年11月在肺活量测定实验室进行的试验进行评价。结果:共纳入440例患者。男性占50.5%,平均年龄61.8±16.5岁。患者年龄、性别、身高、体重相近。75.2%(331例)的试验被评价为成功。检测中最常见的错误是早期终止(84.1%)、患者不合作(29%)和努力不足(22.4%)。这两个时期的误差类型没有什么不同。每位患者的平均检查次数为6次。2019年和2021年肺活量测定试验的总次数分别为262次和178次(p= 0.011),但试验成功率多年来保持不变(p= 0.513)。三个操作人员和测试成功之间没有显著差异(p= 0.909),这两个时期相似。然而,在成功机动之前进行的试验次数差异很大(p= 0.009),在大流行之前所需的机动次数较少。结论:根据这项研究,在大流行期间采取的措施并未影响肺活量测定的质量,但它们确实导致在成功实施操作之前进行了更多的测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
A patient with widespread skin lesions presenting with massive pleural effusion. A perspective on the scope of videoconferencing-based telemedicine in respiratory diseases outpatient clinic. Analysis of one-year follow-up results and treatment costs of patients with PTE in a tertiary care center. Analysis of post-COVID symptoms and predisposing factors for chronic post-COVID syndrome. Characteristics of adverse reactions due to subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy applied between 2011-2021: Single center experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1