Differences in the Analgesic Effect of Opioids on Pain in Cancer Patients With Spinal Metastases.

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Palliative medicine reports Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1089/pmr.2023.0018
Miho Takemura, Kazuyuki Niki, Yoshiaki Okamoto, Hiroshi Tamura, Tomohiro Kawamura, Makie Kohno, Yoshinobu Matsuda, Kenji Ikeda
{"title":"Differences in the Analgesic Effect of Opioids on Pain in Cancer Patients With Spinal Metastases.","authors":"Miho Takemura,&nbsp;Kazuyuki Niki,&nbsp;Yoshiaki Okamoto,&nbsp;Hiroshi Tamura,&nbsp;Tomohiro Kawamura,&nbsp;Makie Kohno,&nbsp;Yoshinobu Matsuda,&nbsp;Kenji Ikeda","doi":"10.1089/pmr.2023.0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal metastasis pain includes both inflammatory and neuropathic pain, and opioids, which have only a μ-opioid receptor-stimulating effect, are generally less effective in neuropathic pain. However, no previous study has been conducted for the comparisons of the efficacy of opioids in treating spinal metastasis pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of tapentadol and methadone with other opioids for back pain caused by a metastatic spinal tumor.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting/subjects: </strong>A total of 274 patients were enrolled, who started a tapentadol extended-release tablet, methadone tablet, hydromorphone extended-release tablet, oxycodone extended-release tablet, or transdermal fentanyl patch for cancer pain due to spinal metastasis in Japan from January 1, 2013 to October 31, 2021.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The primary endpoint, the difference in the numerical rating scale (NRS) scores before and seven days after each opioid administration, was compared among the five groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients with numbness, a decrease of the NRS score on day seven compared with before starting each opioid was significantly higher in the tapentadol group than those in the hydromorphone, oxycodone, and fentanyl groups and comparable to that in the methadone group. In patients without numbness, no significant differences were observed in decreases of the NRS scores on day seven among the five groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tapentadol and methadone may be more effective than hydromorphone, oxycodone, and fentanyl for cancer pain due to spinal metastasis with numbness.</p>","PeriodicalId":74394,"journal":{"name":"Palliative medicine reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10457616/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2023.0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spinal metastasis pain includes both inflammatory and neuropathic pain, and opioids, which have only a μ-opioid receptor-stimulating effect, are generally less effective in neuropathic pain. However, no previous study has been conducted for the comparisons of the efficacy of opioids in treating spinal metastasis pain.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of tapentadol and methadone with other opioids for back pain caused by a metastatic spinal tumor.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting/subjects: A total of 274 patients were enrolled, who started a tapentadol extended-release tablet, methadone tablet, hydromorphone extended-release tablet, oxycodone extended-release tablet, or transdermal fentanyl patch for cancer pain due to spinal metastasis in Japan from January 1, 2013 to October 31, 2021.

Measurements: The primary endpoint, the difference in the numerical rating scale (NRS) scores before and seven days after each opioid administration, was compared among the five groups.

Results: In patients with numbness, a decrease of the NRS score on day seven compared with before starting each opioid was significantly higher in the tapentadol group than those in the hydromorphone, oxycodone, and fentanyl groups and comparable to that in the methadone group. In patients without numbness, no significant differences were observed in decreases of the NRS scores on day seven among the five groups.

Conclusions: Tapentadol and methadone may be more effective than hydromorphone, oxycodone, and fentanyl for cancer pain due to spinal metastasis with numbness.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿片类药物对肿瘤脊柱转移患者疼痛镇痛效果的差异。
背景:脊柱转移性疼痛包括炎性疼痛和神经性疼痛,而阿片类药物仅具有μ-阿片受体刺激作用,通常对神经性疼痛效果较差。然而,目前尚无研究对阿片类药物治疗脊柱转移性疼痛的疗效进行比较。目的:比较他他多、美沙酮与其他阿片类药物治疗脊柱转移性肿瘤所致腰痛的疗效。设计:回顾性队列研究。背景/受试者:2013年1月1日至2021年10月31日,在日本共纳入274例患者,开始使用他他多缓释片、美沙酮缓释片、氢吗啡酮缓释片、羟考酮缓释片或芬太尼透皮贴片治疗脊柱转移癌性疼痛。测量方法:比较五组患者每次阿片类药物给药前和给药后7天数值评定量表(NRS)评分的差异。结果:在出现麻木的患者中,他他多组在第7天NRS评分的下降幅度与开始使用每种阿片类药物前相比,显著高于氢吗啡酮、羟考酮和芬太尼组,与美沙酮组相当。在无麻木的患者中,在第7天,五组之间的NRS评分下降无显著差异。结论:他他多和美沙酮治疗脊柱转移性癌痛伴麻木可能比氢吗啡酮、羟考酮和芬太尼更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Characteristics, Outcomes and Factors for Place of Death in Patients Admitted to Community-Based Palliative Care Services in Shanghai China: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Nursing Practices for Dyspnea Management in Patients with Cancer Based on Monthly and Weekly Prognoses: A Multi-Site Cross-Sectional Study of Palliative Care Nurses in Japan. Is a Combination of Six Clinical Tests Useful as a Measure to Predict Short-Term Prognosis in Terminal Cancer Patients? A Prospective Observational Study in a Japanese Palliative Care Unit. The Surprise Question: Not Ready for Prime Time. Use of Nursing Support Among Nurses for Caregiver Burden in Family Caregivers of Terminally Ill Patients with Cancer in Palliative Care Units in Japan: Multisite Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1