Smoke-free homes in Poland during the COVID-19 pandemic - a nationwide cross-sectional survey.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health Pub Date : 2023-03-02 DOI:10.13075/ijomeh.1896.02002
Aurelia Ostrowska, Jarosław Pinkas, Wojciech Giermaziak, Waldemar Wierzba, Mariusz Gujski, Mateusz Jankowski
{"title":"Smoke-free homes in Poland during the COVID-19 pandemic - a nationwide cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Aurelia Ostrowska,&nbsp;Jarosław Pinkas,&nbsp;Wojciech Giermaziak,&nbsp;Waldemar Wierzba,&nbsp;Mariusz Gujski,&nbsp;Mateusz Jankowski","doi":"10.13075/ijomeh.1896.02002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Secondhand smoke exposure causes serious health problems. Banning smoking in public venues decreases exposure to secondhand smoke. However, the implementation of smoke-free rules in a private setting (including homes) is largely voluntary. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and characteristics of voluntary smoke-free home rules in Poland during the COVID-19 pandemic as well as to identify factors associated with the voluntary implementation of smoking bans at home.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional survey was conducted in March 2022 with a nationally representative sample of 1090 individuals aged ≥18 years in Poland. Data were collected using a computerassisted web interviewing (CAWI) technique. The research tool was an original questionnaire developed for the purpose of this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nationally, 60.6% of individuals had total ban on smoking in home (100% smoke-free home rules), 34.0% had implemented a partial smokefree home rule and 5.4% had not implemented any smoke-free home rules. Over three-quarters of non-smokers (76.8%) and only one-fifth of smokers (20.7%) had adopted a full smoke-free home rule. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, males (OR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.22-2.22, p < 0.01), non-smokers (OR = 13.78, 95% CI: 9.80-19.38, p < 0.001), respondents who had higher education (OR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.15-2.14, p < 0.01) as well as those who lived alone (OR = 2.44, 95% CI: 1.52-3.90, p < 0.001) had higher odds of having a 100% smoke-free home rule.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the implementation of smoke-free home rules in Poland. Less than two-thirds of the Polish population has adopted a total smoke-free home rule, with significant gaps between smokers and nonsmokers. Information on current voluntary smoke-free rules will be useful for further implementation of the smoke-free law in Poland. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2023;36(1):84-95.</p>","PeriodicalId":14173,"journal":{"name":"International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b9/7f/ijomeh-36-84.PMC10464779.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.02002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Secondhand smoke exposure causes serious health problems. Banning smoking in public venues decreases exposure to secondhand smoke. However, the implementation of smoke-free rules in a private setting (including homes) is largely voluntary. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and characteristics of voluntary smoke-free home rules in Poland during the COVID-19 pandemic as well as to identify factors associated with the voluntary implementation of smoking bans at home.

Material and methods: This cross-sectional survey was conducted in March 2022 with a nationally representative sample of 1090 individuals aged ≥18 years in Poland. Data were collected using a computerassisted web interviewing (CAWI) technique. The research tool was an original questionnaire developed for the purpose of this study.

Results: Nationally, 60.6% of individuals had total ban on smoking in home (100% smoke-free home rules), 34.0% had implemented a partial smokefree home rule and 5.4% had not implemented any smoke-free home rules. Over three-quarters of non-smokers (76.8%) and only one-fifth of smokers (20.7%) had adopted a full smoke-free home rule. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, males (OR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.22-2.22, p < 0.01), non-smokers (OR = 13.78, 95% CI: 9.80-19.38, p < 0.001), respondents who had higher education (OR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.15-2.14, p < 0.01) as well as those who lived alone (OR = 2.44, 95% CI: 1.52-3.90, p < 0.001) had higher odds of having a 100% smoke-free home rule.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the implementation of smoke-free home rules in Poland. Less than two-thirds of the Polish population has adopted a total smoke-free home rule, with significant gaps between smokers and nonsmokers. Information on current voluntary smoke-free rules will be useful for further implementation of the smoke-free law in Poland. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2023;36(1):84-95.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病大流行期间波兰的无烟家庭——一项全国性横断面调查。
目的:接触二手烟会导致严重的健康问题。禁止在公共场所吸烟可以减少接触二手烟。然而,在私人环境(包括家庭)实施无烟规定在很大程度上是自愿的。本研究旨在评估2019冠状病毒病大流行期间波兰自愿无烟家庭规定的流行程度和特点,并确定与自愿实施家庭禁烟有关的因素。材料和方法:该横断面调查于2022年3月在波兰进行,具有全国代表性的样本为1090名年龄≥18岁的个体。使用计算机辅助网络访谈(CAWI)技术收集数据。研究工具是为本研究目的而开发的原始问卷。结果:在全国范围内,60.6%的个人在家中完全禁止吸烟(100%无烟家庭规定),34.0%的人实施了部分无烟家庭规定,5.4%的人没有实施任何无烟家庭规定。超过四分之三的不吸烟者(76.8%)和只有五分之一的吸烟者(20.7%)采用了完全无烟的地方法规。在多因素logistic回归分析中,男性(OR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.22-2.22, p < 0.01)、非吸烟者(OR = 13.78, 95% CI: 9.80-19.38, p < 0.001)、受过高等教育的受访者(OR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.15-2.14, p < 0.01)以及独居者(OR = 2.44, 95% CI: 1.52-3.90, p < 0.001)拥有100%无烟家庭规则的几率更高。结论:本研究证明了COVID-19大流行对波兰实施无烟家庭规定的负面影响。波兰只有不到三分之二的人口实行了完全无烟的地方自治,吸烟者和不吸烟者之间的差距很大。关于目前自愿无烟规则的资料将有助于在波兰进一步执行无烟法。中华医学杂志,2009;36(1):84-95。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal is dedicated to present the contemporary research in occupational and environmental health from all over the world. It publishes works concerning: occupational and environmental: medicine, epidemiology, hygiene and toxicology; work physiology and ergonomics, musculoskeletal problems; psychosocial factors at work, work-related mental problems, aging, work ability and return to work; working hours, shift work; reproductive factors and endocrine disruptors; radiation, ionizing and non-ionizing health effects; agricultural hazards; work safety and injury and occupational health service; climate change and its effects on health; omics, genetics and epigenetics in occupational and environmental health; health effects of exposure to nanoparticles and nanotechnology products; human biomarkers in occupational and environmental health, intervention studies, clinical sciences’ achievements with potential to improve occupational and environmental health.
期刊最新文献
Exposure to ionizing radiation of medical staff performing vascular and interventional radiology procedures. The long COVID and its mental health manifestations - the review of literature. Work-related stressors and psychological distress predict career change ideation among Lithuanian healthcare workers. Analysis of dose distribution around a computed tomography scanner in terms of exposure to scattered ionizing radiation of caregivers of pediatric patients. Development and validation of the Communal and Agentic Workplace Climate Scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1