Assessment of variables determining the health management departments' efficiency with analytical hierarchy process.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Services Management Research Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-04 DOI:10.1177/09514848221115089
Gozde Yesilaydin, Menderes Tarcan
{"title":"Assessment of variables determining the health management departments' efficiency with analytical hierarchy process.","authors":"Gozde Yesilaydin, Menderes Tarcan","doi":"10.1177/09514848221115089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was conducted to determine the variables that play a role in the efficiency of Health Management departments in Turkey and the ranking of them in order of importance. These variables were determined by systematic analysis. The Prisma method was used in the systematic analysis approach. Input and output variables used in studies assessing the efficiency of higher education institutions in the literature were listed. The ranking of these variables was determined by Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The questionnaire used for the AHP analysis and the judgments of 127 academicians working in Health Management Departments in universities in Turkey were assessed. The first three input variables found as a result of the AHP were \"the number of registered undergraduate students per faculty member\", \"the number of faculty members\", and \"the number of other academic staff\". The most important three output variables included \"the number of articles searched on SCI, SSCI, SCI-E\", \"the number of papers presented in international congresses\", and \"the count of publications published in international peer-reviewed journals\". To achieve positive developments in the efficiency of Health Management Departments, it is recommended to carry out studies to increase the number of qualified publications.</p>","PeriodicalId":45801,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Management Research","volume":" ","pages":"34-42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09514848221115089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the variables that play a role in the efficiency of Health Management departments in Turkey and the ranking of them in order of importance. These variables were determined by systematic analysis. The Prisma method was used in the systematic analysis approach. Input and output variables used in studies assessing the efficiency of higher education institutions in the literature were listed. The ranking of these variables was determined by Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The questionnaire used for the AHP analysis and the judgments of 127 academicians working in Health Management Departments in universities in Turkey were assessed. The first three input variables found as a result of the AHP were "the number of registered undergraduate students per faculty member", "the number of faculty members", and "the number of other academic staff". The most important three output variables included "the number of articles searched on SCI, SSCI, SCI-E", "the number of papers presented in international congresses", and "the count of publications published in international peer-reviewed journals". To achieve positive developments in the efficiency of Health Management Departments, it is recommended to carry out studies to increase the number of qualified publications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用层次分析法评估决定卫生管理部门效率的变量。
本研究旨在确定影响土耳其卫生管理部门效率的变量及其重要性排序。这些变量是通过系统分析确定的。在系统分析方法中使用了 Prisma 方法。列出了文献中高等教育机构效率评估研究中使用的输入和输出变量。通过层次分析法(AHP)确定了这些变量的排序。对用于 AHP 分析的调查问卷和 127 名在土耳其大学健康管理系工作的院士的判断进行了评估。通过 AHP 分析发现,前三个输入变量分别是 "每名教师注册的本科生人数"、"教师人数 "和 "其他学术人员人数"。最重要的三个输出变量包括 "在 SCI、SSCI、SCI-E 上检索到的文章数量"、"在国际大会上宣读的论文数量 "和 "在国际同行评审期刊上发表的论文数量"。为了提高卫生管理部门的效率,建议开展研究,增加合格出版物的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Management Research
Health Services Management Research HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Health Services Management Research (HSMR) is an authoritative international peer-reviewed journal which publishes theoretically and empirically rigorous research on questions of enduring interest to health-care organizations and systems throughout the world. Examining the real issues confronting health services management, it provides an independent view and cutting edge evidence-based research to guide policy-making and management decision-making. HSMR aims to be a forum serving an international community of academics and researchers on the one hand and healthcare managers, executives, policymakers and clinicians and all health professionals on the other. HSMR wants to make a substantial contribution to both research and managerial practice, with particular emphasis placed on publishing studies which offer actionable findings and on promoting knowledge mobilisation toward theoretical advances.
期刊最新文献
Hybrid managers in an evolving healthcare: Does gender matter? A framework for lean implementation in preoperative assessment: Evidence from a high complexity hospital in Italy. A multi-dimensional study of organisational boundaries and silos in the healthcare sector. "A different sense of what we do here, who we are and what we deliver": Provider perspectives on the effects of a change in governance of healthcare services in correctional facilities in British Columbia. Delphi Plus: A novel methodology for identifying evidence-based data standards for health service decision-making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1