Impact of geriatric co-management on outcomes in hospitalised cardiology patients aged 85 and over.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Netherlands Heart Journal Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-31 DOI:10.1007/s12471-023-01806-y
Renee C M A Raijmann, Huiberdina L Koek, Marielle H Emmelot-Vonk, Joost G E Swaving, Willem R P Agema, Angèle P M Kerckhoffs, Carolina J P W Keijsers
{"title":"Impact of geriatric co-management on outcomes in hospitalised cardiology patients aged 85 and over.","authors":"Renee C M A Raijmann, Huiberdina L Koek, Marielle H Emmelot-Vonk, Joost G E Swaving, Willem R P Agema, Angèle P M Kerckhoffs, Carolina J P W Keijsers","doi":"10.1007/s12471-023-01806-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cardiovascular disease and frailty are common among the population aged 85+. We hypothesised these patients might benefit from geriatric co-management, as has been shown in other frail patient populations. However, there is limited evidence supporting geriatric co-management in older, hospitalised cardiology patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was performed in a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands. We compared patients aged 85 and over admitted to the cardiology ward before (control group) and after the implementation of standard geriatric co-management (intervention group). Data on readmission, mortality, length of stay, number of consultations, delirium, and falls were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data of 1163 patients were analysed (n = 542 control, n = 621 intervention). In the intervention group, 251 patients did not receive the intervention because of logistic reasons or the treating physician's decision. Baseline characteristics were comparable in the intervention and control groups. Patients in the intervention group had a shorter length of stay (-1 day, p = 0.01) and were more often discharged to a geriatric rehabilitation facility (odds ratio [OR] 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-3.54, p = 0.02) compared with the control patients. Other outcomes were not significantly different between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After implementation of standard geriatric co-management for hospitalised cardiology patients aged 85 and over, the length of hospital stay shortened and the number of patients discharged to a geriatric rehabilitation facility increased. The adherence to geriatric team recommendations was high. Geriatric co-management would appear to optimise care for older hospitalised patients with cardiac disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":18952,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":"76-83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10834903/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Netherlands Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-023-01806-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cardiovascular disease and frailty are common among the population aged 85+. We hypothesised these patients might benefit from geriatric co-management, as has been shown in other frail patient populations. However, there is limited evidence supporting geriatric co-management in older, hospitalised cardiology patients.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed in a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands. We compared patients aged 85 and over admitted to the cardiology ward before (control group) and after the implementation of standard geriatric co-management (intervention group). Data on readmission, mortality, length of stay, number of consultations, delirium, and falls were analysed.

Results: The data of 1163 patients were analysed (n = 542 control, n = 621 intervention). In the intervention group, 251 patients did not receive the intervention because of logistic reasons or the treating physician's decision. Baseline characteristics were comparable in the intervention and control groups. Patients in the intervention group had a shorter length of stay (-1 day, p = 0.01) and were more often discharged to a geriatric rehabilitation facility (odds ratio [OR] 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-3.54, p = 0.02) compared with the control patients. Other outcomes were not significantly different between the groups.

Conclusions: After implementation of standard geriatric co-management for hospitalised cardiology patients aged 85 and over, the length of hospital stay shortened and the number of patients discharged to a geriatric rehabilitation facility increased. The adherence to geriatric team recommendations was high. Geriatric co-management would appear to optimise care for older hospitalised patients with cardiac disease.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年病学共同管理对 85 岁及以上住院心脏病患者疗效的影响。
目的:心血管疾病和体弱在 85 岁以上的人群中很常见。我们假设这些患者可能会从老年病学共同管理中获益,这一点已在其他体弱患者群体中得到证实。然而,支持对住院的老年心脏病患者进行老年病学共同管理的证据却很有限:方法:我们在荷兰一家大型教学医院进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们对心脏科病房 85 岁及以上的住院患者在实施标准老年病共同管理之前(对照组)和之后(干预组)的情况进行了比较。我们对再入院、死亡率、住院时间、就诊次数、谵妄和跌倒等数据进行了分析:结果:分析了 1163 名患者的数据(对照组 542 人,干预组 621 人)。在干预组中,251 名患者因后勤原因或主治医生的决定而未接受干预。干预组和对照组的基线特征相当。与对照组患者相比,干预组患者的住院时间更短(-1 天,p = 0.01),更常出院到老年康复机构(几率比 [OR] 1.97,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.10-3.54,p = 0.02)。两组患者的其他结果无明显差异:结论:对85岁及以上的住院心脏病患者实施标准的老年病共同管理后,住院时间缩短了,出院到老年康复机构的患者人数增加了。老年病小组建议的遵守率很高。老年病学共同管理似乎可以优化对住院老年心脏病患者的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Netherlands Heart Journal
Netherlands Heart Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the Netherlands Heart Journal is to contribute to the national and international literature by publishing scientific papers in the field of cardiovascular medicine. It also provides a platform for Continuing Medical Education for cardiologists and those in training for the speciality of cardiology in the Netherlands. The Netherlands Heart Journal is made available to cardiologists, cardiologists in training, cardiopulmonary surgeons, cardiopulmonary surgeons in training, internists and paediatric cardiologists. The journal is the official journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Cost-effectiveness of long term left ventricular assist devices. Reply to 'Cost-effectiveness of long term left ventricular assist devices'. The effects of spondylodiscitis on the inflammation burden in infective endocarditis. Growth rates in non-syndromic aneurysms of the ascending aorta: a systematic review. Advancing cardiovascular care-key insights from the Netherlands Heart Journal 2024.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1