A Systematic Literature Review of Accessibility Evaluation Methods for Augmented Reality Applications.

Q3 Health Professions Studies in Health Technology and Informatics Pub Date : 2023-08-23 DOI:10.3233/SHTI230681
Deogratias Shidende, Thomas Kessel, Anna Treydte, Sabine Moebs
{"title":"A Systematic Literature Review of Accessibility Evaluation Methods for Augmented Reality Applications.","authors":"Deogratias Shidende,&nbsp;Thomas Kessel,&nbsp;Anna Treydte,&nbsp;Sabine Moebs","doi":"10.3233/SHTI230681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Augmented reality is increasingly becoming significant in people's everyday life in different sectors. Particularly to users with disabilities, augmented reality can be an instructional tool and assistive technology, making it worth a vital tool for users with disabilities. For such an important tool, it is essential to understand how these applications are evaluated in order to improve their throughput and extend their accessibility. In that regard, a systematic literature review for peer-reviewed articles published between 2012 and 2022 was conducted to discover which methods, metrics, and tools/techniques researchers use during the accessibility evaluation of augmented reality applications. The PRISMA methodology allowed us to identify, screen, and include 60 articles from three databases. The finding shows that most researchers use task scenarios as the method, qualitative feedback as the metric, and questionnaire as a tool to collect data for accessibility evaluation. The conclusion and future studies are also discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":39242,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Health Technology and Informatics","volume":"306 ","pages":"575-582"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Health Technology and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI230681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Augmented reality is increasingly becoming significant in people's everyday life in different sectors. Particularly to users with disabilities, augmented reality can be an instructional tool and assistive technology, making it worth a vital tool for users with disabilities. For such an important tool, it is essential to understand how these applications are evaluated in order to improve their throughput and extend their accessibility. In that regard, a systematic literature review for peer-reviewed articles published between 2012 and 2022 was conducted to discover which methods, metrics, and tools/techniques researchers use during the accessibility evaluation of augmented reality applications. The PRISMA methodology allowed us to identify, screen, and include 60 articles from three databases. The finding shows that most researchers use task scenarios as the method, qualitative feedback as the metric, and questionnaire as a tool to collect data for accessibility evaluation. The conclusion and future studies are also discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增强现实应用可达性评价方法的系统文献综述。
增强现实在人们日常生活的各个领域中发挥着越来越重要的作用。特别是对于残疾用户,增强现实可以成为一种教学工具和辅助技术,使其成为残疾用户的重要工具。对于这样一个重要的工具,有必要了解如何评估这些应用程序,以便提高它们的吞吐量并扩展它们的可访问性。在这方面,我们对2012年至2022年间发表的同行评审文章进行了系统的文献综述,以发现研究人员在增强现实应用的可访问性评估中使用了哪些方法、指标和工具/技术。PRISMA方法使我们能够从三个数据库中识别、筛选并纳入60篇文章。研究结果表明,在可访问性评价中,研究人员大多采用任务场景作为方法,定性反馈作为度量,问卷作为收集数据的工具。最后对本文的结论和未来的研究进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
Studies in Health Technology and Informatics Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1463
期刊介绍: This book series was started in 1990 to promote research conducted under the auspices of the EC programmes’ Advanced Informatics in Medicine (AIM) and Biomedical and Health Research (BHR) bioengineering branch. A driving aspect of international health informatics is that telecommunication technology, rehabilitative technology, intelligent home technology and many other components are moving together and form one integrated world of information and communication media.
期刊最新文献
Virtual Reality Assessment Reveals Myopic Regression After ICL Implantation in High Myopia. Construction of Guideline-Based Decision Tree for Medication Recommendation. Systemic Risk Management Plan for Electronic Medical Records (EMR): Why and How? Mental Health Patient Portals Aimed at Depression: A Picture Close to Reality. Mettertron - Bridging Metadata Repositories and Terminology Servers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1