The influence of classroom context on AAC device use for nonspeaking school-aged autistic children.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1080/17549507.2023.2220992
Meredith Suhr, Allison Bean, Jordyn Rolniak, Lindsey Paden Cargill, Samantha Lyle
{"title":"The influence of classroom context on AAC device use for nonspeaking school-aged autistic children.","authors":"Meredith Suhr, Allison Bean, Jordyn Rolniak, Lindsey Paden Cargill, Samantha Lyle","doi":"10.1080/17549507.2023.2220992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>: Language learning, including on a speech-generating device (SGD), relies on having communication opportunities to use language. Yet, children who use SGDs do not consistently use their devices throughout the day. As a first step towards increasing device use, it is important to determine how the numerous contexts (e.g. recess, lunch, academic) that exist throughout the school day impact the frequency and type of communication opportunities that children have. Within this study, we used complex adaptive systems theory to investigate whether there were differences in how frequently nonspeaking autistic children classified as emerging communicators (i.e. children who do not consistently produce two-word utterances independently and do not communicate for a variety of communicative functions) used their SGDs to communicate and the type of communication they produced (i.e. spontaneous, prompted, or imitation) across different classroom contexts.<i>Method</i>: Fourteen autistic children who use an SGD as their primary mode of communication were videotaped up to nine times throughout different school days. The videos were coded for the type of device use (i.e. whether the child's use of the device was spontaneous, prompted, or imitation) and classroom context, which were categorised by the inherent level of support and directiveness.<i>Result</i>: There was a significant difference in SGD use across classroom contexts. Overall, the children communicated more and engaged in more spontaneous, prompted, and imitated communication in classroom contexts with high levels of structure (e.g. tabletop work) compared to contexts with low levels of structure and directiveness (e.g. free play).<i>Conclusion</i>: This study highlights the need to increase communication opportunities across all school contexts. Creating appropriate communication opportunities in all contexts, especially those with less structure, will help ensure that communication does not become context-bound.</p>","PeriodicalId":49047,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"434-444"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2023.2220992","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Language learning, including on a speech-generating device (SGD), relies on having communication opportunities to use language. Yet, children who use SGDs do not consistently use their devices throughout the day. As a first step towards increasing device use, it is important to determine how the numerous contexts (e.g. recess, lunch, academic) that exist throughout the school day impact the frequency and type of communication opportunities that children have. Within this study, we used complex adaptive systems theory to investigate whether there were differences in how frequently nonspeaking autistic children classified as emerging communicators (i.e. children who do not consistently produce two-word utterances independently and do not communicate for a variety of communicative functions) used their SGDs to communicate and the type of communication they produced (i.e. spontaneous, prompted, or imitation) across different classroom contexts.Method: Fourteen autistic children who use an SGD as their primary mode of communication were videotaped up to nine times throughout different school days. The videos were coded for the type of device use (i.e. whether the child's use of the device was spontaneous, prompted, or imitation) and classroom context, which were categorised by the inherent level of support and directiveness.Result: There was a significant difference in SGD use across classroom contexts. Overall, the children communicated more and engaged in more spontaneous, prompted, and imitated communication in classroom contexts with high levels of structure (e.g. tabletop work) compared to contexts with low levels of structure and directiveness (e.g. free play).Conclusion: This study highlights the need to increase communication opportunities across all school contexts. Creating appropriate communication opportunities in all contexts, especially those with less structure, will help ensure that communication does not become context-bound.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
课堂情境对不会说话的学龄自闭症儿童使用 AAC 设备的影响。
目的:语言学习(包括使用语音生成设备(SGD))有赖于有使用语言的交流机会。然而,使用 SGD 的儿童并不是全天都在使用他们的设备。作为提高设备使用率的第一步,重要的是要确定学校一天中存在的多种情境(如课间休息、午餐、学习)如何影响儿童交流机会的频率和类型。在本研究中,我们运用复杂适应系统理论,调查在不同的课堂情境中,被归类为新兴交流者(即不能持续独立发出两个单词的话语,也不会为各种交流功能进行交流的儿童)的不说话自闭症儿童使用SGD进行交流的频率是否存在差异,以及他们进行交流的类型(即自发、提示或模仿)是否存在差异:我们对 14 名以使用 SGD 作为主要交流方式的自闭症儿童进行了录像,在不同的学习日最多录制 9 次。视频根据设备使用类型(即儿童使用设备是自发、提示还是模仿)和课堂情境进行编码,并根据固有的支持和指导水平进行分类:结果:在不同的课堂情境中,儿童使用通用句型工具的情况有明显差异。总体而言,与结构性和指导性较低的情境(如自由游戏)相比,在结构性较高的课堂情境(如桌面作业)中,儿童进行了更多的交流,并进行了更多的自发交流、提示交流和模仿交流:本研究强调了在所有学校情境中增加交流机会的必要性。在所有情境中创造适当的交流机会,尤其是那些结构化程度较低的情境,将有助于确保交流不会受到情境的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
73
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is an international journal which promotes discussion on a broad range of current clinical and theoretical issues. Submissions may include experimental, review and theoretical discussion papers, with studies from either quantitative and/or qualitative frameworks. Articles may relate to any area of child or adult communication or dysphagia, furthering knowledge on issues related to etiology, assessment, diagnosis, intervention, or theoretical frameworks. Articles can be accompanied by supplementary audio and video files that will be uploaded to the journal’s website. Special issues on contemporary topics are published at least once a year. A scientific forum is included in many issues, where a topic is debated by invited international experts.
期刊最新文献
Assessing vocabulary acquisition using a fast-mapping task in an Android application: A pilot study. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Aging Voice Index. Understanding user experience and normative data in pharyngeal residue rating scales used in flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES): A scoping review. Caregiver experiences of oral feeding in infants on long-term high flow nasal cannula support. Teacher implementation of an individualised vocabulary intervention programme for dual language learners in a preschool classroom.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1