Exploring Professional Anticipatory Socialization: Who Are the Messengers Influencing Future Physicians' Perceptions of Advanced Practice Providers?

Maura N Polansky, Debra Herrmann, Ulrich Koch
{"title":"Exploring Professional Anticipatory Socialization: Who Are the Messengers Influencing Future Physicians' Perceptions of Advanced Practice Providers?","authors":"Maura N Polansky,&nbsp;Debra Herrmann,&nbsp;Ulrich Koch","doi":"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Evidence exists that physicians in training and practice often do not understand advanced practice providers (APPs) and their roles in professional practice. This study asked the question: What are the messages and messengers during the anticipatory professional socialization period that potentially influence how residents perceive APPs?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured interviews were conducted with 15 residents in one academic setting. Transcripts were analyzed using an inductive approach to coding to identify the messages and sources of those messages (messengers) that had influenced how residents perceived APPs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported limited exposure to APPs before medical school, although most had heard of APPs from family, friends, or advisors or through their own experience in a clinical setting. The messages that participants received were related to how physicians and APPs compare in their training and clinical roles, and how APPs and physicians (and the people who pursue these professions) differ based on their presumed personal attributes. Some messages appeared to support biases against APPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While interprofessional education in medical school aims to prepare physicians to collaborate across professions, attention to anticipatory professional socialization occurring before medical school may also be important to mitigate professional biases that interfere with effective teamwork.</p>","PeriodicalId":39231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Evidence exists that physicians in training and practice often do not understand advanced practice providers (APPs) and their roles in professional practice. This study asked the question: What are the messages and messengers during the anticipatory professional socialization period that potentially influence how residents perceive APPs?

Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 15 residents in one academic setting. Transcripts were analyzed using an inductive approach to coding to identify the messages and sources of those messages (messengers) that had influenced how residents perceived APPs.

Results: Participants reported limited exposure to APPs before medical school, although most had heard of APPs from family, friends, or advisors or through their own experience in a clinical setting. The messages that participants received were related to how physicians and APPs compare in their training and clinical roles, and how APPs and physicians (and the people who pursue these professions) differ based on their presumed personal attributes. Some messages appeared to support biases against APPs.

Conclusion: While interprofessional education in medical school aims to prepare physicians to collaborate across professions, attention to anticipatory professional socialization occurring before medical school may also be important to mitigate professional biases that interfere with effective teamwork.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索职业预期社会化:谁是影响未来医生对高级实践提供者看法的信使?
目的:有证据表明,在培训和实践中的医生往往不了解高级执业医师(app)及其在专业实践中的作用。本研究提出了这样一个问题:在预期的专业社会化期间,哪些信息和信使可能影响居民对app的感知?方法:采用半结构式访谈法,在同一学术场所对15名住院医师进行访谈。使用编码的归纳方法分析转录本,以确定影响居民如何感知app的消息和这些消息(信使)的来源。结果:参与者报告在医学院之前对app的接触有限,尽管大多数人从家人、朋友或顾问那里听说过app,或者通过他们自己在临床环境中的经验。参与者收到的信息与医生和app在培训和临床角色方面的比较有关,以及app和医生(以及从事这些职业的人)如何根据他们假定的个人属性而有所不同。一些信息似乎支持对app的偏见。结论:虽然医学院的跨专业教育旨在培养医生跨专业合作能力,但关注医学院前出现的预期专业社会化也可能对减轻干扰有效团队合作的专业偏见很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
期刊最新文献
Using Four-Component Instructional Design to Create an Interactive Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum for Physician Associate Students. Strengthening the Multiple-Choice Assessment: Improving Item-Writing Skills of Physician Assistant Educators. Physician Assistant Training, Collaboration, and Practice Act Legislation: Perspectives From Practicing Physician Assistants. Compliance With Accreditation Standards on Diversity: Is Institutional Support the Missing Link? Viewing Medical Education Through the Lens of Second Language Acquisition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1