Axial length acquisition success rates and agreement of four optical biometers and one ultrasound biometer in eyes with dense cataracts.

IF 5.4 3区材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL ACS Applied Energy Materials Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1186/s40662-023-00352-3

Pedro Tañá-Rivero, Salvador Aguilar-Córcoles, Pedro Tañá-Sanz, Santiago Tañá-Sanz, Robert Montés-Micó

{"title":"Axial length acquisition success rates and agreement of four optical biometers and one ultrasound biometer in eyes with dense cataracts.","authors":"Pedro Tañá-Rivero, Salvador Aguilar-Córcoles, Pedro Tañá-Sanz, Santiago Tañá-Sanz, Robert Montés-Micó","doi":"10.1186/s40662-023-00352-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To evaluate the axial length acquisition success rates and agreement between various biometric parameters obtained with different biometers in dense cataracts.Methods: Fifty-one eyes were measured using Anterion®, Argos® and IOLMaster® 700 swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometers, a Pentacam® AXL partial coherence interferometry (PCI) biometer, and an OcuScan® RxP ultrasound biometer. We measured keratometry (K1, flattest keratometry and K2, steepest keratometry), white-to-white (WTW), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT) and axial length. Cataracts were classified according to the Lens Opacities Classification System III grading system, the dysfunctional lens index (DLI) and Pentacam® nucleus staging (PNS) metrics. Percentage of acquisition success rate and a Bland-Altman analysis for the agreement between biometers were calculated.Results: The mean LOCS III score was 3.63 ± 0.92, the mean DLI was 2.95 ± 1.30 and the mean PNS was 2.36 ± 1.20. The acquisition success rates for the Anterion®, Argos®, IOLMaster® 700, Pentacam® AXL and OcuScan® RxP biometers were 94.12%, 100%, 98.04%, 60.78% and 100%, respectively. There were significant differences in the success rates between biometers (P = 0.014). There were statistically significant differences between biometers for all parameters evaluated (P < 0.05). The range of the limit of agreement (LoA) for all comparisons of K1 and K2 were > 1.00 D. The LoA for WTW ranged from 0.095 to 1.050 mm. The LoA for ACD and LT ranged from 0.307 to 0.114 mm and from 0.378 to 0.108 mm, respectively. The LoA for axial length ranged from 0.129 to 2.378 mm.Conclusions: Among optical biometers, those based on SS-OCT technology are more successful at measuring axial length in eyes with dense cataracts.Trial registration: The study was registered with the National Institutes of Health (clinical trial identifier NCT05239715, http://www.Clinicaltrials: gov ).","PeriodicalId":4,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-023-00352-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the axial length acquisition success rates and agreement between various biometric parameters obtained with different biometers in dense cataracts.

Methods: Fifty-one eyes were measured using Anterion®, Argos® and IOLMaster® 700 swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometers, a Pentacam® AXL partial coherence interferometry (PCI) biometer, and an OcuScan® RxP ultrasound biometer. We measured keratometry (K1, flattest keratometry and K2, steepest keratometry), white-to-white (WTW), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT) and axial length. Cataracts were classified according to the Lens Opacities Classification System III grading system, the dysfunctional lens index (DLI) and Pentacam® nucleus staging (PNS) metrics. Percentage of acquisition success rate and a Bland-Altman analysis for the agreement between biometers were calculated.

Results: The mean LOCS III score was 3.63 ± 0.92, the mean DLI was 2.95 ± 1.30 and the mean PNS was 2.36 ± 1.20. The acquisition success rates for the Anterion®, Argos®, IOLMaster® 700, Pentacam® AXL and OcuScan® RxP biometers were 94.12%, 100%, 98.04%, 60.78% and 100%, respectively. There were significant differences in the success rates between biometers (P = 0.014). There were statistically significant differences between biometers for all parameters evaluated (P < 0.05). The range of the limit of agreement (LoA) for all comparisons of K1 and K2 were > 1.00 D. The LoA for WTW ranged from 0.095 to 1.050 mm. The LoA for ACD and LT ranged from 0.307 to 0.114 mm and from 0.378 to 0.108 mm, respectively. The LoA for axial length ranged from 0.129 to 2.378 mm.

Conclusions: Among optical biometers, those based on SS-OCT technology are more successful at measuring axial length in eyes with dense cataracts.

Trial registration: The study was registered with the National Institutes of Health (clinical trial identifier NCT05239715, http://www.

Clinicaltrials: gov ).

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

4种光学生物计和1种超声生物计在密闭性白内障眼的轴长采集成功率及一致性。

背景:评价密闭性白内障用不同生物计获得的眼轴长度获取成功率和不同生物特征参数之间的一致性。方法:使用Anterion®、Argos®和IOLMaster®700扫源光学相干断层扫描(SS-OCT)生物计、Pentacam®AXL部分相干干涉(PCI)生物计和OcuScan®RxP超声生物计测量51只眼睛。我们测量了角膜度数(K1，最平坦的角膜度数和K2，最陡峭的角膜度数)、白对白(WTW)、前房深度(ACD)、晶状体厚度(LT)和轴向长度。根据晶状体混浊分级系统III、功能不全晶状体指数(DLI)和Pentacam®核分期(PNS)指标对白内障进行分类。计算了获取成功率百分比和生物计之间一致性的Bland-Altman分析。结果:los III平均评分为3.63±0.92,DLI平均评分为2.95±1.30,PNS平均评分为2.36±1.20。Anterion®、Argos®、IOLMaster®700、Pentacam®AXL和OcuScan®RxP生物计的采集成功率分别为94.12%、100%、98.04%、60.78%和100%。两种生物计的成功率差异有统计学意义(P = 0.014)。各生物计间各参数差异有统计学意义(P = 1.00 d)， WTW的LoA范围为0.095 ~ 1.050 mm。ACD和LT的LoA分别为0.307 ~ 0.114 mm和0.378 ~ 0.108 mm。结论:在光学生物计中，基于SS-OCT技术的生物计能较好地测量致密性白内障的眼轴长。试验注册:该研究已在美国国立卫生研究院注册(临床试验标识符NCT05239715, http://www.Clinicaltrials: gov)。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

ACS Applied Energy Materials Materials Science-Materials Chemistry

CiteScore

10.30

自引率

6.20%

发文量

1368

期刊介绍： ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.