Describing the dynamic nature of transactions costs during political event risk episodes†

High Frequency Pub Date : 2018-04-02 DOI:10.1002/hf2.10018
Bluford Putnam, Graham McDannel, Mohandas Ayikara, Lakshmi Sameera Peyyalamitta
{"title":"Describing the dynamic nature of transactions costs during political event risk episodes†","authors":"Bluford Putnam,&nbsp;Graham McDannel,&nbsp;Mohandas Ayikara,&nbsp;Lakshmi Sameera Peyyalamitta","doi":"10.1002/hf2.10018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Transactions costs as measured by how wide the bid-ask spread expands to execute fully large trades is a dynamically evolving process, especially during political risk event episodes. Our research looks at four case studies of political event risk: The UK “Brexit” referendum of June 2016, the US elections of November 2016, the first round of the French Presidential election in April 2017, and the UK “snap” Parliamentary election in June 2017. Each of these political events represented cases where the date of the event was known while the pre-event expectations were dealing with highly polar possible outcomes. This created the possibility of pre-event bi-modal return expectation probability distributions, which would resolve into single-mode distributions as the outcome become known. We examine second-by-second order book data for the relevant futures products and describe how transactions costs dynamically evolved during the “outcome discovery” period and then the “post-outcome re-balancing” period.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100604,"journal":{"name":"High Frequency","volume":"1 1","pages":"6-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/hf2.10018","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"High Frequency","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hf2.10018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Transactions costs as measured by how wide the bid-ask spread expands to execute fully large trades is a dynamically evolving process, especially during political risk event episodes. Our research looks at four case studies of political event risk: The UK “Brexit” referendum of June 2016, the US elections of November 2016, the first round of the French Presidential election in April 2017, and the UK “snap” Parliamentary election in June 2017. Each of these political events represented cases where the date of the event was known while the pre-event expectations were dealing with highly polar possible outcomes. This created the possibility of pre-event bi-modal return expectation probability distributions, which would resolve into single-mode distributions as the outcome become known. We examine second-by-second order book data for the relevant futures products and describe how transactions costs dynamically evolved during the “outcome discovery” period and then the “post-outcome re-balancing” period.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
描述政治事件风险事件中交易成本的动态性质
交易成本是一个动态变化的过程,尤其是在政治风险事件发生期间,交易成本是通过买卖价差扩大到执行完全大宗交易的程度来衡量的。我们的研究着眼于四个政治事件风险的案例研究:2016年6月的英国“脱欧”公投、2016年11月的美国大选、2017年4月的法国总统选举第一轮以及2017年6月的英国“提前”议会选举。这些政治事件中的每一个都代表了事件日期已知的情况,而事件前的预期则是处理高度极化的可能结果。这创造了事件前双模态回报期望概率分布的可能性,随着结果的已知,它将分解为单模态分布。我们研究了相关期货产品的每一秒订单数据,并描述了交易成本在“结果发现”时期和“结果后再平衡”时期是如何动态演变的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The dixie cup problem and FKG inequality Market making under a weakly consistent limit order book model Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard model for hedging energy with quantity risk On multilateral incomplete information decision models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1