The screen for cognitive impairment in psychiatry in patients with borderline personality disorder.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Personality and Mental Health Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1002/pmh.1539
Federica Folesani, Martino Belvederi Murri, Bruno Biancosino, Silvia Costa, Luigi Zerbinati, Rosangela Caruso, Maria Giulia Nanni, Tommaso Toffanin, Maria Ferrara, Scot E Purdon, Luigi Grassi
{"title":"The screen for cognitive impairment in psychiatry in patients with borderline personality disorder.","authors":"Federica Folesani,&nbsp;Martino Belvederi Murri,&nbsp;Bruno Biancosino,&nbsp;Silvia Costa,&nbsp;Luigi Zerbinati,&nbsp;Rosangela Caruso,&nbsp;Maria Giulia Nanni,&nbsp;Tommaso Toffanin,&nbsp;Maria Ferrara,&nbsp;Scot E Purdon,&nbsp;Luigi Grassi","doi":"10.1002/pmh.1539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive deficits are common in borderline personality disorder (BPD) and appear to be associated with psychopathology, functioning and outcome. The availability of a cognitive screening instrument could be of use in clinical settings in order to assess neurocognition in BPD patients. The Screen for Cognitive Impairment for Psychiatry (SCIP) proved to be reliable in different psychiatric populations, but it has not yet been validated in personality disorders. The purpose of this study is therefore to evaluate its psychometric properties in a sample of 58 BPD patients. The SCIP was validated against the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) and the Trail Making Test A and B (TMT A and B). The receiver operator curve analysis displayed an acceptable convergent validity (total score AUC: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.70-0.86; Se: 75%, Sp: 72%). A cut-off total score of 80 identified 81% of patients as cognitively impaired. The exploratory factor analysis displayed a one-factor solution explaining 55.8% of the total variance. The SCIP displayed adequate psychometric properties in BPD and could be integrated in the routine clinical assessment to provide a preliminary evaluation of cognitive features for BPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":46871,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/26/13/PMH-16-.PMC9788074.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1539","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Cognitive deficits are common in borderline personality disorder (BPD) and appear to be associated with psychopathology, functioning and outcome. The availability of a cognitive screening instrument could be of use in clinical settings in order to assess neurocognition in BPD patients. The Screen for Cognitive Impairment for Psychiatry (SCIP) proved to be reliable in different psychiatric populations, but it has not yet been validated in personality disorders. The purpose of this study is therefore to evaluate its psychometric properties in a sample of 58 BPD patients. The SCIP was validated against the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) and the Trail Making Test A and B (TMT A and B). The receiver operator curve analysis displayed an acceptable convergent validity (total score AUC: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.70-0.86; Se: 75%, Sp: 72%). A cut-off total score of 80 identified 81% of patients as cognitively impaired. The exploratory factor analysis displayed a one-factor solution explaining 55.8% of the total variance. The SCIP displayed adequate psychometric properties in BPD and could be integrated in the routine clinical assessment to provide a preliminary evaluation of cognitive features for BPD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
边缘型人格障碍患者的精神病学认知障碍筛查。
认知缺陷在边缘型人格障碍(BPD)中很常见,并且似乎与精神病理、功能和结果有关。认知筛查仪器的可用性可用于临床设置,以评估BPD患者的神经认知。精神病学认知障碍筛查(SCIP)在不同的精神病学人群中被证明是可靠的,但它尚未在人格障碍中得到验证。因此,本研究的目的是在58例BPD患者样本中评估其心理测量特性。SCIP通过神经心理状态评估可重复测试(RBANS)和轨迹制作测试A和B (TMT A和B)进行验证。受试者操作曲线分析显示出可接受的收敛效度(总分AUC: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.70-0.86;Se: 75%, Sp: 72%)。截止总分为80分,表明81%的患者认知受损。探索性因子分析显示,单因素解决方案解释总方差的55.8%。SCIP在BPD中显示了足够的心理测量特性,可以整合到常规临床评估中,为BPD的认知特征提供初步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Personality and Mental Health: Multidisciplinary Studies from Personality Dysfunction to Criminal Behaviour aims to lead and shape the international field in this rapidly expanding area, uniting three distinct literatures: DSM-IV/ICD-10 defined personality disorders, psychopathy and offending behaviour. Through its multi-disciplinary and service orientated approach, Personality and Mental Health provides a peer-reviewed, authoritative resource for researchers, practitioners and policy makers working in the areas of personality and mental health.
期刊最新文献
Levels of grit in patients with borderline personality disorder: Description and prediction. Compatibility of Linehan's biosocial theory and the DSM‐5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders for borderline personality disorder Conceptualizing adult ADHD with the DSM alternative model of personality disorder. The structure of pathological personality traits and temperament in a Persian community sample. Response to "Antisocial personality traits relationship with behaviours and beliefs on COVID-19 containment measures: Investigation in a large Brazilian sample".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1