FDA Guidance on Shedding and Environmental Impact in Clinical Trials Involving Gene Therapy Products.

IF 0.5 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Applied Biosafety Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1089/apb.2022.0020
Daniel Eisenman, Scott Swindle
{"title":"FDA Guidance on Shedding and Environmental Impact in Clinical Trials Involving Gene Therapy Products.","authors":"Daniel Eisenman,&nbsp;Scott Swindle","doi":"10.1089/apb.2022.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The US regulatory environment is evolving to accommodate a boom in gene therapy research. The 2019 version of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Guidelines on Research Involving Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules (NIH Guidelines) lacks an appendix providing specific guidance for Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) review of clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>As the field matures, the burden of Federal oversight for clinical trials of investigational products containing recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecules is shifting toward the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This report summarizes recent FDA guidance documents on shedding and considerations for environmental impact assessments highlighting key points pertinent to IBC review.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This report helps biosafety professionals understand the evolving regulatory framework for gene therapy products. Knowledge of the guidance documents discussed in this report will assist biosafety professionals in addressing issues pertaining to shedding and environmental impact during IBC review of clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":7962,"journal":{"name":"Applied Biosafety","volume":"27 3","pages":"191-197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9908273/pdf/apb.2022.0020.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Biosafety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/apb.2022.0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The US regulatory environment is evolving to accommodate a boom in gene therapy research. The 2019 version of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Guidelines on Research Involving Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules (NIH Guidelines) lacks an appendix providing specific guidance for Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) review of clinical trials.

Discussion: As the field matures, the burden of Federal oversight for clinical trials of investigational products containing recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecules is shifting toward the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This report summarizes recent FDA guidance documents on shedding and considerations for environmental impact assessments highlighting key points pertinent to IBC review.

Conclusion: This report helps biosafety professionals understand the evolving regulatory framework for gene therapy products. Knowledge of the guidance documents discussed in this report will assist biosafety professionals in addressing issues pertaining to shedding and environmental impact during IBC review of clinical trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FDA关于基因治疗产品临床试验中脱落和环境影响的指南。
美国的监管环境正在演变,以适应基因治疗研究的繁荣。2019年版本的美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)关于涉及重组或合成核酸分子的研究指南(NIH指南)缺乏为机构生物安全委员会(IBC)审查临床试验提供具体指导的附录。讨论:随着该领域的成熟,联邦政府对含有重组或合成核酸分子的研究产品的临床试验监督的负担正在向食品和药物管理局(FDA)转移。本报告总结了最近FDA关于脱落和环境影响评估考虑的指导文件,突出了与IBC审查相关的关键点。结论:本报告有助于生物安全专业人士了解基因治疗产品不断发展的监管框架。本报告中讨论的指导文件的知识将有助于生物安全专业人员在IBC审查临床试验期间解决有关脱落和环境影响的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Biosafety
Applied Biosafety Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Applied Biosafety (APB), sponsored by ABSA International, is a peer-reviewed, scientific journal committed to promoting global biosafety awareness and best practices to prevent occupational exposures and adverse environmental impacts related to biohazardous releases. APB provides a forum for exchanging sound biosafety and biosecurity initiatives by publishing original articles, review articles, letters to the editors, commentaries, and brief reviews. APB informs scientists, safety professionals, policymakers, engineers, architects, and governmental organizations. The journal is committed to publishing on topics significant in well-resourced countries as well as information relevant to underserved regions, engaging and cultivating the development of biosafety professionals globally.
期刊最新文献
Decontamination Validation of the BSL-4 Chemical Disinfectant Deluge Shower System. Call for Volume 30 (2025) Special Issue Papers: Biosafety and Biosecurity for Potential Pandemic Pathogens and Dual-Use Research of Concern: Deadline for Manuscript Submission: October 31, 2024. Safeguarding Mail-Order DNA Synthesis in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Frequency of Leaks from Conical Centrifuge Tubes Boundary Integrity Testing of Containment Level 3 (Biological Safety Level 3) Laboratories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1