The Effectiveness of Three Regimens of Sedation for Children Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Clinical Study.

Anesthesia, Essays and Researches Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-09 DOI:10.4103/aer.aer_45_22
Shwethashri Kondavagilu Ramaprasannakumar, Varadarajan Bhadrinarayan, Sudhir Venkataramaiah
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Three Regimens of Sedation for Children Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Clinical Study.","authors":"Shwethashri Kondavagilu Ramaprasannakumar,&nbsp;Varadarajan Bhadrinarayan,&nbsp;Sudhir Venkataramaiah","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_45_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) under sedation requires faster recovery for early discharge and feeding resumption in children with neuropsychiatric disorders. The use of dexmedetomidine alone results in delayed recovery. Propofol, when used alone, can cause hypotension and respiratory depression. A new regimen for sedation was evaluated by exploiting the properties of these drugs, to allow faster recovery with minimal adverse events.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred and fifty children aged 2-12 years requiring MRI were randomly allocated to these three groups. Group P (<i>n</i> = 50) received propofol bolus at 2 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> over 10 min followed by infusion at 100 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup>.min<sup>-1</sup>. Group D (<i>n</i> = 50) received dexmedetomidine bolus of 2 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup> over 10 min followed by infusion at 1 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup>.h<sup>-1</sup>. Group PD (<i>n</i> = 50) received propofol bolus at 2 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> over 10 min followed by dexmedetomidine infusion at 1 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup>.h<sup>-1</sup>. Recovery characteristics were noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recovery following sedation in Group PD (15 ± 7.0 min) and Group P (17.35 ± 7.4 min) were comparable and significantly (<i>P</i> = 0.03) lesser than Group D (27.58 ± 8.09 min). Emergence delirium scores were significantly less in Group PD (5 ± 1.08) and Group D (5.6 ± 2.4), unlike scores in Group P (9 ± 2.43). About 79.5% (39/49) of children in Group P, 88.2% (45/51) of children in Group D, and 86% (43/50) of children in Group PD completed MRI without any movement. Seven (14.58%) in Group P, 2 (4%) in Group D, and 5 (10.20%) in Group PD required rescue sedation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The regimen with propofol bolus and dexmedetomidine infusion provided adequate sedation and better recovery characteristics in children aged 2-12 years without systemic complications, as compared to the use of either agent alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 3","pages":"345-352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813997/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_45_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) under sedation requires faster recovery for early discharge and feeding resumption in children with neuropsychiatric disorders. The use of dexmedetomidine alone results in delayed recovery. Propofol, when used alone, can cause hypotension and respiratory depression. A new regimen for sedation was evaluated by exploiting the properties of these drugs, to allow faster recovery with minimal adverse events.

Materials and methods: One hundred and fifty children aged 2-12 years requiring MRI were randomly allocated to these three groups. Group P (n = 50) received propofol bolus at 2 mg.kg-1 over 10 min followed by infusion at 100 μg.kg-1.min-1. Group D (n = 50) received dexmedetomidine bolus of 2 μg.kg-1 over 10 min followed by infusion at 1 μg.kg-1.h-1. Group PD (n = 50) received propofol bolus at 2 mg.kg-1 over 10 min followed by dexmedetomidine infusion at 1 μg.kg-1.h-1. Recovery characteristics were noted.

Results: Recovery following sedation in Group PD (15 ± 7.0 min) and Group P (17.35 ± 7.4 min) were comparable and significantly (P = 0.03) lesser than Group D (27.58 ± 8.09 min). Emergence delirium scores were significantly less in Group PD (5 ± 1.08) and Group D (5.6 ± 2.4), unlike scores in Group P (9 ± 2.43). About 79.5% (39/49) of children in Group P, 88.2% (45/51) of children in Group D, and 86% (43/50) of children in Group PD completed MRI without any movement. Seven (14.58%) in Group P, 2 (4%) in Group D, and 5 (10.20%) in Group PD required rescue sedation.

Conclusion: The regimen with propofol bolus and dexmedetomidine infusion provided adequate sedation and better recovery characteristics in children aged 2-12 years without systemic complications, as compared to the use of either agent alone.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种镇静方式对儿童磁共振成像效果的临床研究。
背景:镇静状态下的磁共振成像(MRI)需要更快的恢复,才能使患有神经精神障碍的儿童尽早出院和恢复进食。单独使用右美托咪定会导致恢复延迟。单独使用异丙酚会引起低血压和呼吸抑制。通过利用这些药物的特性,对一种新的镇静方案进行了评估,以使其能够在最小的不良事件下更快地恢复。材料和方法:150名2-12岁需要MRI检查的儿童被随机分为这三组。P组(n=50)以2mg.kg-1的丙泊酚推注10分钟,然后以100μg.kg-1输注。D组(n=50)接受右美托咪定2μg.kg-1推注10分钟,然后以1μg.kg-1.h-1输注。PD组(n=50)接受丙泊酚2mg.kg-1推注10分钟,然后输注右美托咪定1μg.kg-1。注意到回收特征。结果:PD组(15±7.0分钟)和P组(17.35±7.4分钟)镇静后的恢复情况相当,且显著(P=0.03)低于D组(27.58±8.09分钟)。与P组(9±2.43)的评分不同,PD组(5±1.08)和D组(5.6±2.4)的突发性谵妄评分显著降低。P组约79.5%(39/49)的儿童、D组约88.2%(45/51)的儿童和PD组约86%(43/50)的儿童在没有任何运动的情况下完成了MRI检查。P组7例(14.58%),D组2例(4%),PD组5例(10.20%)需要抢救性镇静。结论:与单独使用这两种药物相比,丙泊酚推注和右美托咪定输注方案为2-12岁的儿童提供了足够的镇静和更好的恢复特性,没有系统性并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparison of two prophylactic doses of ephedrine to attenuate the hemodynamic responses in adults receiving propofol in general anesthesia; a South Indian perspective Comparison of hemodynamic stability with continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring and intermittent oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Thoracic epidural analgesia vs. intravenous analgesia in blunt thoracic trauma patients, managed conservatively with noninvasive ventilation (NIV): A prospective observational study Comparison of postoperative analgesic effects of gelfoam soaked with ropivacaine 0.5% and gelfoam soaked with dexamethasone 8 mg with placebo in single-level lumbar laminectomy A Randomised Control Study Comparing C-MAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope (Hyper Angulated Blade) and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Insertion of a Double-Lumen Tube in Patients Undergoing Elective Thoracotomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1