Toward reliable machine learning with Congruity: a quality measure based on formal concept analysis.

IF 4.5 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Neural Computing & Applications Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s00521-022-07853-7
Carmen De Maio, Giuseppe Fenza, Mariacristina Gallo, Vincenzo Loia, Claudio Stanzione
{"title":"Toward reliable machine learning with <i>Congruity</i>: a quality measure based on formal concept analysis.","authors":"Carmen De Maio,&nbsp;Giuseppe Fenza,&nbsp;Mariacristina Gallo,&nbsp;Vincenzo Loia,&nbsp;Claudio Stanzione","doi":"10.1007/s00521-022-07853-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The spreading of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods in different and critical application domains, like medicine and healthcare, introduces many opportunities but raises risks and opens ethical issues, mainly attaining to the lack of transparency. This contribution deals with the lack of transparency of ML and DL models focusing on the lack of trust in predictions and decisions generated. In this sense, this paper establishes a measure, namely <i>Congruity</i>, to provide information about the reliability of ML/DL model results. <i>Congruity</i> is defined by the lattice extracted through the formal concept analysis built on the training data. It measures how much the incoming data items are close to the ones used at the training stage of the ML and DL models. The general idea is that the reliability of trained model results is highly correlated with the similarity of input data and the training set. The objective of the paper is to demonstrate the correlation between the <i>Congruity</i> and the well-known <i>Accuracy</i> of the whole ML/DL model. Experimental results reveal that the value of correlation between <i>Congruity</i> and <i>Accuracy</i> of ML model is greater than 80% by varying ML models.</p>","PeriodicalId":49766,"journal":{"name":"Neural Computing & Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540094/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Computing & Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07853-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The spreading of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods in different and critical application domains, like medicine and healthcare, introduces many opportunities but raises risks and opens ethical issues, mainly attaining to the lack of transparency. This contribution deals with the lack of transparency of ML and DL models focusing on the lack of trust in predictions and decisions generated. In this sense, this paper establishes a measure, namely Congruity, to provide information about the reliability of ML/DL model results. Congruity is defined by the lattice extracted through the formal concept analysis built on the training data. It measures how much the incoming data items are close to the ones used at the training stage of the ML and DL models. The general idea is that the reliability of trained model results is highly correlated with the similarity of input data and the training set. The objective of the paper is to demonstrate the correlation between the Congruity and the well-known Accuracy of the whole ML/DL model. Experimental results reveal that the value of correlation between Congruity and Accuracy of ML model is greater than 80% by varying ML models.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
迈向具有一致性的可靠机器学习:基于形式概念分析的质量度量。
机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)方法在不同和关键的应用领域(如医学和医疗保健)的传播,带来了许多机会,但也带来了风险,并引发了道德问题,主要是缺乏透明度。这一贡献解决了ML和DL模型缺乏透明度的问题,重点是对所生成的预测和决策缺乏信任。在这个意义上,本文建立了一个度量,即一致性,以提供关于ML/DL模型结果可靠性的信息。通过建立在训练数据上的形式化概念分析提取出的格来定义一致性。它测量输入的数据项与ML和DL模型训练阶段使用的数据项的接近程度。一般的想法是,训练模型结果的可靠性与输入数据和训练集的相似度高度相关。本文的目的是证明整个ML/DL模型的一致性和众所周知的准确性之间的相关性。实验结果表明,通过不同的机器学习模型,机器学习模型的一致性和准确率的相关值大于80%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neural Computing & Applications
Neural Computing & Applications 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
1280
审稿时长
6.9 months
期刊介绍: Neural Computing & Applications is an international journal which publishes original research and other information in the field of practical applications of neural computing and related techniques such as genetic algorithms, fuzzy logic and neuro-fuzzy systems. All items relevant to building practical systems are within its scope, including but not limited to: -adaptive computing- algorithms- applicable neural networks theory- applied statistics- architectures- artificial intelligence- benchmarks- case histories of innovative applications- fuzzy logic- genetic algorithms- hardware implementations- hybrid intelligent systems- intelligent agents- intelligent control systems- intelligent diagnostics- intelligent forecasting- machine learning- neural networks- neuro-fuzzy systems- pattern recognition- performance measures- self-learning systems- software simulations- supervised and unsupervised learning methods- system engineering and integration. Featured contributions fall into several categories: Original Articles, Review Articles, Book Reviews and Announcements.
期刊最新文献
Stress monitoring using wearable sensors: IoT techniques in medical field. A new hybrid model of convolutional neural networks and hidden Markov chains for image classification. Analysing sentiment change detection of Covid-19 tweets. Normal vibration distribution search-based differential evolution algorithm for multimodal biomedical image registration. Special issue on deep learning and big data analytics for medical e-diagnosis/AI-based e-diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1