Hand-held echocardiography during complex electrophysiologic procedures.

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.34172/jcvtr.2023.31621
Selda Murat, Taner Ulus, Ahmet Serdar Yılmaz, Halit Emre Yalvaç, Ezgi Çamlı, Muhammet Dural
{"title":"Hand-held echocardiography during complex electrophysiologic procedures.","authors":"Selda Murat,&nbsp;Taner Ulus,&nbsp;Ahmet Serdar Yılmaz,&nbsp;Halit Emre Yalvaç,&nbsp;Ezgi Çamlı,&nbsp;Muhammet Dural","doi":"10.34172/jcvtr.2023.31621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Complex electrophysiologic (EP) procedures are time consuming and open to complications. Accurate and rapid recognition of cardiac pathologies is essential before, during, and immediately after such procedures. In this study, we aimed to compare hand-held echocardiography (HHE) with standard echocardiography (SE) to determine whether HHE can be used as a practical and reliable diagnostic tool during such procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred consecutive patients undergoing complex EP procedures and catheter ablation were included in the study. All patients were evaluated with SE or HHE in terms of main cardiac pathologies at the beginning and immediately after the procedure. The diagnostic accuracy and evaluation time of both methods were compared at the beginning and after the procedure. The agreement between both methods was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the beginning and after the procedure, opening and evaluation times with HHE were significantly shorter than with SE (<i>P</i><0.001 for all). There was significant agreement between the two methods in the diagnosis of cardiac pathologies (Agreement was 95% for minimal mild aortic regurgitation (AR), 99% for moderate/ severe AR, 93% for minimal/ mild mitral regurgitation (MR), 95% for moderate/ severe MR, 100% for pericardial effusion, and 100% for left ventricular thrombus at the beginning of the procedure).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With the use of HHE during complex EP procedures, cardiac pathologies can be diagnosed with similar accuracy as SE. In addition, HHE has a significant advantage over SE in terms of time to diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15207,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10466465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jcvtr.2023.31621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Complex electrophysiologic (EP) procedures are time consuming and open to complications. Accurate and rapid recognition of cardiac pathologies is essential before, during, and immediately after such procedures. In this study, we aimed to compare hand-held echocardiography (HHE) with standard echocardiography (SE) to determine whether HHE can be used as a practical and reliable diagnostic tool during such procedures.

Methods: One hundred consecutive patients undergoing complex EP procedures and catheter ablation were included in the study. All patients were evaluated with SE or HHE in terms of main cardiac pathologies at the beginning and immediately after the procedure. The diagnostic accuracy and evaluation time of both methods were compared at the beginning and after the procedure. The agreement between both methods was calculated.

Results: At the beginning and after the procedure, opening and evaluation times with HHE were significantly shorter than with SE (P<0.001 for all). There was significant agreement between the two methods in the diagnosis of cardiac pathologies (Agreement was 95% for minimal mild aortic regurgitation (AR), 99% for moderate/ severe AR, 93% for minimal/ mild mitral regurgitation (MR), 95% for moderate/ severe MR, 100% for pericardial effusion, and 100% for left ventricular thrombus at the beginning of the procedure).

Conclusion: With the use of HHE during complex EP procedures, cardiac pathologies can be diagnosed with similar accuracy as SE. In addition, HHE has a significant advantage over SE in terms of time to diagnosis.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复杂电生理过程中的手持式超声心动图。
简介:复杂的电生理(EP)程序是耗时和开放的并发症。在此类手术之前、期间和之后,准确和快速地识别心脏病变是至关重要的。在本研究中,我们旨在比较手持超声心动图(HHE)与标准超声心动图(SE),以确定HHE是否可以作为此类手术中实用可靠的诊断工具。方法:连续100例接受复杂EP手术和导管消融的患者纳入研究。所有患者在手术开始时和手术后立即用SE或HHE评估主要心脏病理。比较两种方法术前和术后的诊断准确率和评估时间。计算了两种方法的一致性。结果:在手术开始和手术结束后,HHE的开启和评估时间明显短于SE (p)。结论:在复杂的EP手术中使用HHE可以诊断出与SE相似的心脏病变。此外,在诊断时间方面,HHE比SE具有显著优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research
Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Acellular carotid scaffold and evaluation the biological and biomechanical properties for tissue engineering Vietnamese version of the Hypertension Knowledge-Level Scale (HK-LS): Translation and validation Right pulmonary artery compression following acute type A aortic dissection resulting in acute right ventricular heart failure: A case report Low-dose, high-pitch, spiral (FLASH) mode versus conventional sequential method for coronary artery calcium scoring: A derivation-validation study Risk factors for re-expansion pulmonary edema following chest tube drainage in patients with spontaneous pneumothorax: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1