Maximum Voided Volume Is a Better Clinical Parameter for Bladder Capacity Than Maximum Cystometric Capacity in Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY International Neurourology Journal Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.5213/inj.2244158.079
Min Hyuk Kim, Jungyo Suh, Hyoun-Joong Kong, Seung-June Oh
{"title":"Maximum Voided Volume Is a Better Clinical Parameter for Bladder Capacity Than Maximum Cystometric Capacity in Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Min Hyuk Kim,&nbsp;Jungyo Suh,&nbsp;Hyoun-Joong Kong,&nbsp;Seung-June Oh","doi":"10.5213/inj.2244158.079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Bladder capacity is an important parameter in the diagnosis of lower urinary tract dysfunction. We aimed to determine whether the maximum bladder capacity (MCC) measured during a urodynamic study was affected by involuntary detrusor contraction (IDC) in patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS)/Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between March 2020 and April 2021, we obtained maximum voided volume (MVV) from a 3-day frequency-volume chart, MCC during filling cystometry, and maximum anesthetic bladder capacity (MABC) during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate under spinal or general anesthesia in 139 men with LUTS/BPH aged >50 years. Patients were divided according to the presence of IDC during filling cystometry. We assumed that the MABC is close to the true value of the MCC, as it is measured under the condition of minimizing neural influence over the bladder.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference in demographic and clinical characteristics between the non-IDC (n=20) and IDC groups (n=119) (mean age, 71.5±7.4) (P>0.05). The non-IDC group had greater bladder volume to feel the first sensation, first desire, and strong desire than the IDC group (P<0.001). In all patients, MABC and MVV were correlated (r=0.41, P<0.001); however, there was no correlation between MCC and MABC (r=0.19, P=0.02). There was no significant difference in MABC between the non-IDC and IDC groups (P=0.19), but MVV and MCC were significantly greater in the non-IDC group (P<0.001). There was no significant difference between MABC and MVV (MABC-MVV, P=0.54; MVV/MABC, P=0.07), but there was a significant difference between MABC and MCC between the non-IDC and IDC groups (MABC-MCC, P<0.001; MCC/MABC, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Maximum bladder capacity from a urodynamic study does not represent true bladder capacity because of involuntary contractions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14466,"journal":{"name":"International Neurourology Journal","volume":"26 4","pages":"317-324"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/06/79/inj-2244158-079.PMC9816439.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Neurourology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.2244158.079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Bladder capacity is an important parameter in the diagnosis of lower urinary tract dysfunction. We aimed to determine whether the maximum bladder capacity (MCC) measured during a urodynamic study was affected by involuntary detrusor contraction (IDC) in patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS)/Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).

Methods: Between March 2020 and April 2021, we obtained maximum voided volume (MVV) from a 3-day frequency-volume chart, MCC during filling cystometry, and maximum anesthetic bladder capacity (MABC) during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate under spinal or general anesthesia in 139 men with LUTS/BPH aged >50 years. Patients were divided according to the presence of IDC during filling cystometry. We assumed that the MABC is close to the true value of the MCC, as it is measured under the condition of minimizing neural influence over the bladder.

Results: There was no difference in demographic and clinical characteristics between the non-IDC (n=20) and IDC groups (n=119) (mean age, 71.5±7.4) (P>0.05). The non-IDC group had greater bladder volume to feel the first sensation, first desire, and strong desire than the IDC group (P<0.001). In all patients, MABC and MVV were correlated (r=0.41, P<0.001); however, there was no correlation between MCC and MABC (r=0.19, P=0.02). There was no significant difference in MABC between the non-IDC and IDC groups (P=0.19), but MVV and MCC were significantly greater in the non-IDC group (P<0.001). There was no significant difference between MABC and MVV (MABC-MVV, P=0.54; MVV/MABC, P=0.07), but there was a significant difference between MABC and MCC between the non-IDC and IDC groups (MABC-MCC, P<0.001; MCC/MABC, P<0.001).

Conclusion: Maximum bladder capacity from a urodynamic study does not represent true bladder capacity because of involuntary contractions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下尿路症状/良性前列腺增生患者的最大排尿容积比最大膀胱容量更能反映膀胱容量:一项前瞻性队列研究
目的:膀胱容量是诊断下尿路功能障碍的重要指标。我们的目的是确定在尿动力学研究中测量的最大膀胱容量(MCC)是否受到下尿路症状(LUTS)/良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者的不自主逼尿肌收缩(IDC)的影响。方法:在2020年3月至2021年4月期间,我们通过为期3天的频率-体积图获得了139名年龄>50岁的LUTS/BPH男性患者在脊髓或全身麻醉下进行钬激光前列腺摘除术时的最大空体积(MVV)、填充膀胱术时的MCC和最大麻醉膀胱容量(MABC)。根据充盈膀胱术中有无IDC进行分组。我们假设MABC接近MCC的真实值,因为它是在最小化神经对膀胱的影响的条件下测量的。结果:非IDC组(n=20)与IDC组(n=119)的人口学及临床特征(平均年龄71.5±7.4)无统计学差异(P>0.05)。非IDC组比IDC组有更大的膀胱容量来感受第一感觉、第一欲望和强烈的欲望(结论:尿动力学研究的最大膀胱容量不能代表真正的膀胱容量,因为不自主收缩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Neurourology Journal
International Neurourology Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
41
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Neurourology Journal (Int Neurourol J, INJ) is a quarterly international journal that publishes high-quality research papers that provide the most significant and promising achievements in the fields of clinical neurourology and fundamental science. Specifically, fundamental science includes the most influential research papers from all fields of science and technology, revolutionizing what physicians and researchers practicing the art of neurourology worldwide know. Thus, we welcome valuable basic research articles to introduce cutting-edge translational research of fundamental sciences to clinical neurourology. In the editorials, urologists will present their perspectives on these articles. The original mission statement of the INJ was published on October 12, 1997. INJ provides authors a fast review of their work and makes a decision in an average of three to four weeks of receiving submissions. If accepted, articles are posted online in fully citable form. Supplementary issues will be published interim to quarterlies, as necessary, to fully allow berth to accept and publish relevant articles.
期刊最新文献
Public Perceptions of Enuresis: Insights From Online Communities in South Korea and the United States. Serious Games as a Therapeutic Tool in Pediatric Urology: A Review of Current Applications and Future Directions. The Integral Theory, Pelvic Floor Biomechanics, and Binary Innervation. The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form as a Substitute for 1-Hour Pad Weight Testing in the Evaluation of Urinary Incontinence in Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Undergoing Surgery. Urodynamic and Frequency-Volume Chart Parameters Influencing Anticholinergic Resistance in Patients With Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1