Comparison of mortality and feeding behavior of the false cleanerfish Aspidontus taeniatus and the lance blenny A. dussumieri regarding the effects of mimicry.
{"title":"Comparison of mortality and feeding behavior of the false cleanerfish <i>Aspidontus taeniatus</i> and the lance blenny <i>A. dussumieri</i> regarding the effects of mimicry.","authors":"Tetsuo Kuwamura, Hajime Sato, Yoichi Sakai","doi":"10.1007/s10164-022-00769-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many examples of mimicry have been reported in coral reef fishes of which the most well known is the mimicry of the bluestreak cleaner wrasse, <i>Labroides dimidiatus</i> by the false cleanerfish, <i>Aspidontus taeniatus</i>. To examine the effect of protective and aggressive mimicry of <i>A. taeniatus</i>, mortality and feeding behavior were compared with those of the non-mimic lance blenny, <i>Aspidontus dussumieri</i>, by field observations on the coral reefs of Miyako Island, Okinawa, southern Japan. Survival rate of <i>A. taeniatus</i> was more than twice higher than that of <i>A. dussumieri</i>, but the detected differences were not significant, and the effect of protective mimicry could not be determined. The benthic foods common to both species (the tubeworm, <i>Spirobranchus giganteus,</i> and the boring clam, <i>Tridacna crocea</i>) were very scarce in the study sites, and the feeding behavior of the two species was clearly different: <i>A. dussumieri</i> pecked at the bottom substrate, whereas <i>A. taeniatus</i> fed on fish fins and eggs of damselfish, regardless of body size. Our findings are the first documented evidence of the effect of aggressive mimicry on biting fish fins in relation to the availability of other foods not only in small but also in large <i>A. taeniatus.</i></p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10164-022-00769-8.</p>","PeriodicalId":54837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethology","volume":"41 1","pages":"73-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666927/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-022-00769-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Many examples of mimicry have been reported in coral reef fishes of which the most well known is the mimicry of the bluestreak cleaner wrasse, Labroides dimidiatus by the false cleanerfish, Aspidontus taeniatus. To examine the effect of protective and aggressive mimicry of A. taeniatus, mortality and feeding behavior were compared with those of the non-mimic lance blenny, Aspidontus dussumieri, by field observations on the coral reefs of Miyako Island, Okinawa, southern Japan. Survival rate of A. taeniatus was more than twice higher than that of A. dussumieri, but the detected differences were not significant, and the effect of protective mimicry could not be determined. The benthic foods common to both species (the tubeworm, Spirobranchus giganteus, and the boring clam, Tridacna crocea) were very scarce in the study sites, and the feeding behavior of the two species was clearly different: A. dussumieri pecked at the bottom substrate, whereas A. taeniatus fed on fish fins and eggs of damselfish, regardless of body size. Our findings are the first documented evidence of the effect of aggressive mimicry on biting fish fins in relation to the availability of other foods not only in small but also in large A. taeniatus.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10164-022-00769-8.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Ethology features reviews and original papers relating to all aspects of animal behavior, including traditional ethology. Papers on field, laboratory, or theoretical studies are welcomed. In contrast to many other ethological journals that prefer studies testing explicit hypotheses, the Journal of Ethology is interested both in observational studies and in experimental studies. However, the authors of observational studies are always requested to provide background information about behaviors in their study and an appropriate context to establish the scientific importance of their observation, which in turn produces fascinating hypotheses to explain the behaviors.