Comparison of mortality and feeding behavior of the false cleanerfish Aspidontus taeniatus and the lance blenny A. dussumieri regarding the effects of mimicry.

IF 0.9 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Journal of Ethology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s10164-022-00769-8
Tetsuo Kuwamura, Hajime Sato, Yoichi Sakai
{"title":"Comparison of mortality and feeding behavior of the false cleanerfish <i>Aspidontus taeniatus</i> and the lance blenny <i>A. dussumieri</i> regarding the effects of mimicry.","authors":"Tetsuo Kuwamura,&nbsp;Hajime Sato,&nbsp;Yoichi Sakai","doi":"10.1007/s10164-022-00769-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many examples of mimicry have been reported in coral reef fishes of which the most well known is the mimicry of the bluestreak cleaner wrasse, <i>Labroides dimidiatus</i> by the false cleanerfish, <i>Aspidontus taeniatus</i>. To examine the effect of protective and aggressive mimicry of <i>A. taeniatus</i>, mortality and feeding behavior were compared with those of the non-mimic lance blenny, <i>Aspidontus dussumieri</i>, by field observations on the coral reefs of Miyako Island, Okinawa, southern Japan. Survival rate of <i>A. taeniatus</i> was more than twice higher than that of <i>A. dussumieri</i>, but the detected differences were not significant, and the effect of protective mimicry could not be determined. The benthic foods common to both species (the tubeworm, <i>Spirobranchus giganteus,</i> and the boring clam, <i>Tridacna crocea</i>) were very scarce in the study sites, and the feeding behavior of the two species was clearly different: <i>A. dussumieri</i> pecked at the bottom substrate, whereas <i>A. taeniatus</i> fed on fish fins and eggs of damselfish, regardless of body size. Our findings are the first documented evidence of the effect of aggressive mimicry on biting fish fins in relation to the availability of other foods not only in small but also in large <i>A. taeniatus.</i></p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10164-022-00769-8.</p>","PeriodicalId":54837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethology","volume":"41 1","pages":"73-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666927/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-022-00769-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Many examples of mimicry have been reported in coral reef fishes of which the most well known is the mimicry of the bluestreak cleaner wrasse, Labroides dimidiatus by the false cleanerfish, Aspidontus taeniatus. To examine the effect of protective and aggressive mimicry of A. taeniatus, mortality and feeding behavior were compared with those of the non-mimic lance blenny, Aspidontus dussumieri, by field observations on the coral reefs of Miyako Island, Okinawa, southern Japan. Survival rate of A. taeniatus was more than twice higher than that of A. dussumieri, but the detected differences were not significant, and the effect of protective mimicry could not be determined. The benthic foods common to both species (the tubeworm, Spirobranchus giganteus, and the boring clam, Tridacna crocea) were very scarce in the study sites, and the feeding behavior of the two species was clearly different: A. dussumieri pecked at the bottom substrate, whereas A. taeniatus fed on fish fins and eggs of damselfish, regardless of body size. Our findings are the first documented evidence of the effect of aggressive mimicry on biting fish fins in relation to the availability of other foods not only in small but also in large A. taeniatus.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10164-022-00769-8.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
假清洁鱼带纹蜘蛛和假清洁鱼在模仿效应下的死亡率和摄食行为比较。
据报道,在珊瑚礁鱼类中有许多模仿的例子,其中最著名的是模仿蓝纹清洁鱼Labroides dimidiatus被假清洁鱼Aspidontus taeniatus模仿。通过对日本南部冲绳岛宫古岛珊瑚礁的野外观察,比较了带绦虫的保护性和攻击性模仿行为与非模仿长条棘球绦虫的死亡率和摄食行为。带绦虫的存活率比杜氏蜱高2倍以上,但检测到的差异不显著,不能确定保护性模仿的作用。两种物种共同的底栖食物(管虫,Spirobranchus giganteus和无聊蛤,Tridacna crocea)在研究地点非常稀少,并且两种物种的摄食行为明显不同:dussumieri在底部基质上啄食,而A. taeniatus则以鱼鳍和雀鲷的卵为食,无论体型大小。我们的发现是第一个记录的证据,证明攻击性模仿对咬鱼鳍的影响与其他食物的可用性有关,不仅在小的,而且在大的带绦虫中。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,可在10.1007/s10164-022-00769-8获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ethology
Journal of Ethology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ethology features reviews and original papers relating to all aspects of animal behavior, including traditional ethology. Papers on field, laboratory, or theoretical studies are welcomed. In contrast to many other ethological journals that prefer studies testing explicit hypotheses, the Journal of Ethology is interested both in observational studies and in experimental studies. However, the authors of observational studies are always requested to provide background information about behaviors in their study and an appropriate context to establish the scientific importance of their observation, which in turn produces fascinating hypotheses to explain the behaviors.
期刊最新文献
A theory of spawning habitat selection in anurans Subterranean to submarine: stress-induced locomotor repertoire expansion and aquatic escape in the Anatolian mole rat (Nannospalax xanthodon) under risk of predation Risk-taking behavior in birds foraging along interurban roads Reduced fitness in losers of leg-biting male combat compared to uncontested males in Zophobas atratus Day-after impact of simulated rival encounter in the common cuckoo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1