Qualitative Study of Telehealth Delivery of Suicide-Specific Group Treatment "Project Life Force".

Sapana R Patel, Sarah R Sullivan, Emily L Mitchell, Shari Jager-Hyman, Barbara Stanley, Marianne Goodman
{"title":"Qualitative Study of Telehealth Delivery of Suicide-Specific Group Treatment \"Project Life Force\".","authors":"Sapana R Patel, Sarah R Sullivan, Emily L Mitchell, Shari Jager-Hyman, Barbara Stanley, Marianne Goodman","doi":"10.1007/s41347-022-00297-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Minimal evidence exists for suicide-specific group treatment for high-risk patients offered over telehealth. This qualitative study assessed the acceptability, feasibility, and impact of a telehealth suicide safety planning intervention (SPI) multi-session group. High-risk suicidal Veterans (<i>n</i> = 17) participating in \"Project Life Force-telehealth\" (PLF-T); a manualized, 10-session SPI video group completed semi-structured qualitative interviews including measures of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. We also interviewed the PLF-T coordinator and PLF-T group facilitators to identify adaptations to deliver PLF-T and learn about barriers and facilitators to implementation. A summary template and matrix analysis approach was used to analyze qualitative data. Veteran group participants were mostly male (88%), age 50 (SD = 15.6), ethnically diverse, and either divorced or separated (54%). Suicide symptoms upon study entry included past month ideation with methods (100%); and past year aborted, interrupted, or actual suicide attempt (59%). Participant interviews revealed an overall positive endorsement of PLF-telehealth with enhanced suicidal disclosure, and improved ability to manage urges and mitigate loneliness. On scales from 1 to 20, PLF-T was rated as highly acceptable (M = 17.50; SD = 2.92), appropriate (M = 17.25; SD = 3.59), and feasible (M = 18; SD = 2.45) by participants. Adaptations to deliver PLF-T included using a communications coordinator to conduct assertive outreach and engagement, adding a telehealth orientation session, restructuring sessions to review suicide severity, and screen-sharing safety plans to maximize learning. PLF-T enhanced convenience and access without compromising safety. Concerns included privacy and technological limitations including connectivity. Project Life Force-telehealth is acceptable and feasible to deliver via telehealth. This opens the possibility of delivery to hard-to-reach high-risk populations. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0365363.</p>","PeriodicalId":73962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of technology in behavioral science","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of technology in behavioral science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-022-00297-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Minimal evidence exists for suicide-specific group treatment for high-risk patients offered over telehealth. This qualitative study assessed the acceptability, feasibility, and impact of a telehealth suicide safety planning intervention (SPI) multi-session group. High-risk suicidal Veterans (n = 17) participating in "Project Life Force-telehealth" (PLF-T); a manualized, 10-session SPI video group completed semi-structured qualitative interviews including measures of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. We also interviewed the PLF-T coordinator and PLF-T group facilitators to identify adaptations to deliver PLF-T and learn about barriers and facilitators to implementation. A summary template and matrix analysis approach was used to analyze qualitative data. Veteran group participants were mostly male (88%), age 50 (SD = 15.6), ethnically diverse, and either divorced or separated (54%). Suicide symptoms upon study entry included past month ideation with methods (100%); and past year aborted, interrupted, or actual suicide attempt (59%). Participant interviews revealed an overall positive endorsement of PLF-telehealth with enhanced suicidal disclosure, and improved ability to manage urges and mitigate loneliness. On scales from 1 to 20, PLF-T was rated as highly acceptable (M = 17.50; SD = 2.92), appropriate (M = 17.25; SD = 3.59), and feasible (M = 18; SD = 2.45) by participants. Adaptations to deliver PLF-T included using a communications coordinator to conduct assertive outreach and engagement, adding a telehealth orientation session, restructuring sessions to review suicide severity, and screen-sharing safety plans to maximize learning. PLF-T enhanced convenience and access without compromising safety. Concerns included privacy and technological limitations including connectivity. Project Life Force-telehealth is acceptable and feasible to deliver via telehealth. This opens the possibility of delivery to hard-to-reach high-risk populations. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0365363.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对远程医疗提供自杀专项小组治疗 "生命力量项目 "的定性研究。
通过远程医疗为高危患者提供自杀专项小组治疗的证据极少。这项定性研究评估了远程医疗自杀安全计划干预(SPI)多疗程小组的可接受性、可行性和影响。参与 "远程健康生命力量项目"(PLF-T)的高危退伍军人(17 人)完成了半结构化定性访谈,包括对可接受性、适宜性和可行性的测量。我们还对 PLF-T 协调员和 PLF-T 小组主持人进行了访谈,以确定提供 PLF-T 的适应性,并了解实施的障碍和促进因素。我们采用了总结模板和矩阵分析方法来分析定性数据。退伍军人小组参与者大多为男性(88%),年龄为 50 岁(SD = 15.6),种族多样,不是离异就是分居(54%)。参加研究时出现的自杀症状包括:过去一个月内有自杀意念并采取了自杀方法(100%);过去一年内自杀未遂、自杀中断或实际自杀未遂(59%)。对参与者的访谈显示,他们对 PLF-telehealth的总体认可度较高,自杀倾向的披露程度有所提高,控制自杀冲动和缓解孤独感的能力也有所增强。根据 1 到 20 分的评分标准,参与者对 PLF-T 的评分为高度可接受(M = 17.50;SD = 2.92)、适当(M = 17.25;SD = 3.59)和可行(M = 18;SD = 2.45)。为提供 PLF-T 而进行的调整包括:使用一名沟通协调员来开展积极的外联和参与活动,增加远程医疗指导环节,调整环节以审查自杀严重程度,以及通过屏幕共享安全计划来最大限度地提高学习效果。PLF-T 在不影响安全性的前提下提高了便利性和可及性。人们关注的问题包括隐私和技术限制,包括连接性。生命力量项目-远程保健通过远程保健提供服务是可以接受的,也是可行的。这为向难以接触到的高风险人群提供服务提供了可能性。ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT0365363。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using Digital Technology to Increase Integration of Meditation into Daily Life: The Case for Meditation-Based Ecological Momentary Interventions. Investigating the Effectiveness of CBT-i Coach, a Free, Publicly Available mHealth App for Insomnia. Applying Behavioral Biometrics to Mobile Device Use Measurement in Children: Evaluating the Impact of Training Data Size, Proximity, and Type on Model Performance. Pilot Study of Factors Influencing Engagement with an mHealth Intervention Among Teens with Eating Disorder Symptoms. Differences in Self-Monitoring Technology Use and Perceptions Between National Weight Control Registry Participants Maintaining and Regaining Weight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1