First-pass Success Rate and Number of Attempts Required for Intubation in Anticipated Difficult Airway: Comparison between Macintosh and Channeled King Vision Video Laryngoscopes.

Anesthesia, Essays and Researches Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-31 DOI:10.4103/aer.aer_68_22
Rameez Raja, Sunana Gupta, Nandita Mehta, Prerna Attal
{"title":"First-pass Success Rate and Number of Attempts Required for Intubation in Anticipated Difficult Airway: Comparison between Macintosh and Channeled King Vision Video Laryngoscopes.","authors":"Rameez Raja,&nbsp;Sunana Gupta,&nbsp;Nandita Mehta,&nbsp;Prerna Attal","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_68_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Video laryngoscopy has been shown to improvise Cormack-Lehane grading and rate of successful tracheal intubation and is now incorporated in most of the difficult airway guidelines. Since there is scarce literature regarding the use of channeled blade of King Vision video laryngoscope (KVVL) in anticipated difficult intubation, we planned to undertake this randomized control trial to assess the performance of channeled blade of KVVL and Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with anticipated difficult intubation.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>This prospective randomized study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned equally to the KVVL group or Macintosh group. The primary outcome of the study was intubation success in the first attempt and number of attempts required for intubation, and the secondary outcomes were Cormack-Lehane grading and time required to intubate in both the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first-pass success of intubation was 88.6% in the KVVL group and 76.5% in the Macintosh group (<i>P</i> = 0.035). The second attempt of intubation was required in 11.4% and 20.6% of patients in the KVVL and Macintosh groups, respectively. Cormack Lehane Grade I was achieved in 100% of patients of the KVVL group as compared to 29.4% of patients in the Macintosh group. Moreover, the difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.035). The mean duration of intubation was prolonged in the KVVL group as compared to the Macintosh group, and the difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The channeled blade of KVVL had a higher first-pass success rate and required fewer attempts to intubate when used in patients with anticipated difficult intubation. Further, the KVVL was found to be significantly better than the Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of Cormack-Lehane grading, but the time taken to intubate the trachea was more in the KVVL group.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 3","pages":"340-344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813986/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_68_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Video laryngoscopy has been shown to improvise Cormack-Lehane grading and rate of successful tracheal intubation and is now incorporated in most of the difficult airway guidelines. Since there is scarce literature regarding the use of channeled blade of King Vision video laryngoscope (KVVL) in anticipated difficult intubation, we planned to undertake this randomized control trial to assess the performance of channeled blade of KVVL and Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with anticipated difficult intubation.

Design and setting: This prospective randomized study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital.

Materials and methods: Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned equally to the KVVL group or Macintosh group. The primary outcome of the study was intubation success in the first attempt and number of attempts required for intubation, and the secondary outcomes were Cormack-Lehane grading and time required to intubate in both the groups.

Results: The first-pass success of intubation was 88.6% in the KVVL group and 76.5% in the Macintosh group (P = 0.035). The second attempt of intubation was required in 11.4% and 20.6% of patients in the KVVL and Macintosh groups, respectively. Cormack Lehane Grade I was achieved in 100% of patients of the KVVL group as compared to 29.4% of patients in the Macintosh group. Moreover, the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.035). The mean duration of intubation was prolonged in the KVVL group as compared to the Macintosh group, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.04).

Conclusion: The channeled blade of KVVL had a higher first-pass success rate and required fewer attempts to intubate when used in patients with anticipated difficult intubation. Further, the KVVL was found to be significantly better than the Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of Cormack-Lehane grading, but the time taken to intubate the trachea was more in the KVVL group.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
首次通过成功率和预期困难气道插管所需的尝试次数:Macintosh和Channeled King Vision视频喉镜的比较。
背景和目的:视频喉镜已被证明可以提高Cormack-Lehane分级和气管插管成功率,目前已被纳入大多数困难气道指南。由于关于在预期困难插管中使用King Vision视频喉镜(KVVL)通道刀片的文献很少,我们计划进行这项随机对照试验,以评估KVVL和Macintosh喉镜通道刀片在预期困难气管插管患者中的性能。设计和设置:这项前瞻性随机研究在一家三级护理医院进行。材料和方法:符合入选标准的患者被随机分为KVVL组或Macintosh组。该研究的主要结果是第一次插管成功率和插管所需的次数,次要结果是两组的Cormack-Lehane分级和插管所需要的时间。结果:KVVL组第一次插管成功率为88.6%,Macintosh组为76.5%(P=0.035)。KVVL和Macintosh组分别有11.4%和20.6%的患者需要第二次插管。KVVL组100%的患者达到Cormack-Lehane I级,而Macintosh组的患者达到了29.4%。此外,差异具有统计学意义(P=0.035)。KVVL组的平均插管时间比Macintosh组延长,结论:KVVL的通道刀片在预期插管困难的患者中使用时,首次通过成功率较高,插管次数较少。此外,在Cormack-Lehane分级方面,KVVL明显优于Macintosh喉镜,但KVVL组气管插管所需时间更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparison of two prophylactic doses of ephedrine to attenuate the hemodynamic responses in adults receiving propofol in general anesthesia; a South Indian perspective Comparison of hemodynamic stability with continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring and intermittent oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Thoracic epidural analgesia vs. intravenous analgesia in blunt thoracic trauma patients, managed conservatively with noninvasive ventilation (NIV): A prospective observational study Comparison of postoperative analgesic effects of gelfoam soaked with ropivacaine 0.5% and gelfoam soaked with dexamethasone 8 mg with placebo in single-level lumbar laminectomy A Randomised Control Study Comparing C-MAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope (Hyper Angulated Blade) and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Insertion of a Double-Lumen Tube in Patients Undergoing Elective Thoracotomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1