Long-term effects of titanium-base abutments on peri-implant health: A 5-year randomised controlled trial.

Florian Rathe, Rüdiger Junker, Christian Heumann, Julia Blumenröhr, Thorsten Auschill, Nicole Arweiler, Markus Schlee
{"title":"Long-term effects of titanium-base abutments on peri-implant health: A 5-year randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Florian Rathe,&nbsp;Rüdiger Junker,&nbsp;Christian Heumann,&nbsp;Julia Blumenröhr,&nbsp;Thorsten Auschill,&nbsp;Nicole Arweiler,&nbsp;Markus Schlee","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Titanium bases are used frequently in daily practice for bonding to CAD/CAM abutments or crowns. Due to intimate contact between the adhesive gap of the titanium-base abutment and the peri-implant bone, the physical and chemical characteristics of the bonding material, or the gap itself, may affect peri-implant inflammatory reactions. The present study therefore aimed to examine the long-term effects of individualised abutments bonded to titanium bases on peri-implant health.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 24 patients, each with one test and one control abutment, participated in the present prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. The test abutments were CAD/CAM titanium abutments bonded to titanium bases. As the control abutments were individualised, one-piece CAD/CAM titanium abutments were used. Clinical and radiographic parameters were assessed at abutment insertion and then on a yearly basis over the following 5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in marginal bone level were observed between the titanium-base and one-piece abutments at any of the follow-up time points; however, when intragroup marginal bone levels were compared to the baseline values, significant differences were found at several follow-up time points. Intergroup differences were only found to be significant for pocket depth at the 4- (P = 0.006) and 5-year follow-ups (P = 0.024), favouring titanium-base abutments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limitations of the present study, it appears that the peri-implant tissues of this specific patient cohort responded to titanium-base abutments in a rather similar manner to one-piece abutments over a 5-year period; however, no definitive conclusions can be drawn due to the low power of the present study.</p>","PeriodicalId":73463,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Titanium bases are used frequently in daily practice for bonding to CAD/CAM abutments or crowns. Due to intimate contact between the adhesive gap of the titanium-base abutment and the peri-implant bone, the physical and chemical characteristics of the bonding material, or the gap itself, may affect peri-implant inflammatory reactions. The present study therefore aimed to examine the long-term effects of individualised abutments bonded to titanium bases on peri-implant health.

Materials and methods: A total of 24 patients, each with one test and one control abutment, participated in the present prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. The test abutments were CAD/CAM titanium abutments bonded to titanium bases. As the control abutments were individualised, one-piece CAD/CAM titanium abutments were used. Clinical and radiographic parameters were assessed at abutment insertion and then on a yearly basis over the following 5 years.

Results: No significant differences in marginal bone level were observed between the titanium-base and one-piece abutments at any of the follow-up time points; however, when intragroup marginal bone levels were compared to the baseline values, significant differences were found at several follow-up time points. Intergroup differences were only found to be significant for pocket depth at the 4- (P = 0.006) and 5-year follow-ups (P = 0.024), favouring titanium-base abutments.

Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present study, it appears that the peri-implant tissues of this specific patient cohort responded to titanium-base abutments in a rather similar manner to one-piece abutments over a 5-year period; however, no definitive conclusions can be drawn due to the low power of the present study.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钛基基牙对种植体周围健康的长期影响:一项5年随机对照试验
用途:钛基托在日常实践中经常用于连接CAD/CAM基台或冠。钛基基基牙的粘接剂间隙与种植周骨紧密接触,粘接剂材料的物理化学特性或间隙本身都可能影响种植周骨的炎症反应。因此,本研究旨在检查与钛基结合的个体化基台对种植体周围健康的长期影响。材料与方法:本研究为前瞻性、单盲、随机对照临床试验,共24例患者,每例患者设1个试验组和1个对照基台。试验基台采用CAD/CAM钛基台与钛基台结合。由于对照基台是个体化的,因此使用了一体式CAD/CAM钛基台。在基台插入时评估临床和影像学参数,然后在接下来的5年中每年评估一次。结果:随访各时间点钛基基与一体式基牙的边缘骨水平无明显差异;然而,当将组内边缘骨水平与基线值进行比较时,在几个随访时间点发现显著差异。组间差异仅在4- (P = 0.006)和5年随访时(P = 0.024)发现袋深有显著性,有利于钛基基牙。结论:在本研究的限制下,在5年的时间里,这一特定患者群体的种植体周围组织对钛基基牙的反应与一件式基牙相当相似;然而,由于本研究的有效性较低,无法得出明确的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A 360-degree extraction socket classification for immediate dentoalveolar restoration. A randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of guided bone regeneration with polytetrafluoroethylene titanium-reinforced membranes, CAD/CAM semi-occlusive titanium meshes and CAD/CAM occlusive titanium foils in partially atrophic arches. Bone augmentation using titanium mesh: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical and histological efficacy of a new implant surface in achieving early and stable osseointegration: An in vivo study. Crown-to-implant ratio: A misnomer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1