Estimation of a Machine Learning-Based Decision Rule to Reduce Hypoglycemia Among Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Post Hoc Analysis of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the WISDM Study.

IF 4.1 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-11 DOI:10.1177/19322968221149040
Anna R Kahkoska, Kushal S Shah, Michael R Kosorok, Kellee M Miller, Michael Rickels, Ruth S Weinstock, Laura A Young, Richard E Pratley
{"title":"Estimation of a Machine Learning-Based Decision Rule to Reduce Hypoglycemia Among Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Post Hoc Analysis of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the WISDM Study.","authors":"Anna R Kahkoska, Kushal S Shah, Michael R Kosorok, Kellee M Miller, Michael Rickels, Ruth S Weinstock, Laura A Young, Richard E Pratley","doi":"10.1177/19322968221149040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Wireless Innovation for Seniors with Diabetes Mellitus (WISDM) study demonstrated continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) reduced hypoglycemia over 6 months among older adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) compared with blood glucose monitoring (BGM). We explored heterogeneous treatment effects of CGM on hypoglycemia by formulating a data-driven decision rule that selects an intervention (ie, CGM vs BGM) to minimize percentage of time <70 mg/dL for each individual WISDM participant.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The precision medicine analyses used data from participants with complete data (n = 194 older adults, including those who received CGM [n = 100] and BGM [n = 94] in the trial). Policy tree and decision list algorithms were fit with 14 baseline demographic, clinical, and laboratory measures. The primary outcome was CGM-measured percentage of time spent in hypoglycemic range (<70 mg/dL), and the decision rule assigned participants to a subgroup reflecting the treatment estimated to minimize this outcome across all follow-up visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal decision rule was found to be a decision list with 3 steps. The first step moved WISDM participants with baseline time-below range >1.35% and no detectable C-peptide levels to the CGM subgroup (n = 139), and the second step moved WISDM participants with a baseline time-below range of >6.45% to the CGM subgroup (n = 18). The remaining participants (n = 37) were left in the BGM subgroup. Compared with the BGM subgroup (n = 37; 19%), the group for whom CGM minimized hypoglycemia (n = 157; 81%) had more baseline hypoglycemia, a lower proportion of detectable C-peptide, higher glycemic variability, longer disease duration, and higher proportion of insulin pump use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The decision rule underscores the benefits of CGM for older adults to reduce hypoglycemia. Diagnostic CGM and laboratory markers may inform decision-making surrounding therapeutic CGM and identify older adults for whom CGM may be a critical intervention to reduce hypoglycemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":15475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1079-1086"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418529/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968221149040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Wireless Innovation for Seniors with Diabetes Mellitus (WISDM) study demonstrated continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) reduced hypoglycemia over 6 months among older adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) compared with blood glucose monitoring (BGM). We explored heterogeneous treatment effects of CGM on hypoglycemia by formulating a data-driven decision rule that selects an intervention (ie, CGM vs BGM) to minimize percentage of time <70 mg/dL for each individual WISDM participant.

Method: The precision medicine analyses used data from participants with complete data (n = 194 older adults, including those who received CGM [n = 100] and BGM [n = 94] in the trial). Policy tree and decision list algorithms were fit with 14 baseline demographic, clinical, and laboratory measures. The primary outcome was CGM-measured percentage of time spent in hypoglycemic range (<70 mg/dL), and the decision rule assigned participants to a subgroup reflecting the treatment estimated to minimize this outcome across all follow-up visits.

Results: The optimal decision rule was found to be a decision list with 3 steps. The first step moved WISDM participants with baseline time-below range >1.35% and no detectable C-peptide levels to the CGM subgroup (n = 139), and the second step moved WISDM participants with a baseline time-below range of >6.45% to the CGM subgroup (n = 18). The remaining participants (n = 37) were left in the BGM subgroup. Compared with the BGM subgroup (n = 37; 19%), the group for whom CGM minimized hypoglycemia (n = 157; 81%) had more baseline hypoglycemia, a lower proportion of detectable C-peptide, higher glycemic variability, longer disease duration, and higher proportion of insulin pump use.

Conclusions: The decision rule underscores the benefits of CGM for older adults to reduce hypoglycemia. Diagnostic CGM and laboratory markers may inform decision-making surrounding therapeutic CGM and identify older adults for whom CGM may be a critical intervention to reduce hypoglycemia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估算基于机器学习的决策规则以减少 1 型糖尿病老年人的低血糖症:WISDM 研究中连续血糖监测的事后分析。
背景:老年糖尿病患者无线创新(WISDM)研究表明,与血糖监测(BGM)相比,连续血糖监测(CGM)可在 6 个月内减少 1 型糖尿病(T1D)老年人的低血糖症状。我们通过制定数据驱动的决策规则,选择干预措施(即 CGM 与 BGM),最大限度地减少方法的时间百分比,从而探索 CGM 对低血糖的异质性治疗效果:精准医学分析使用的数据来自数据完整的参与者(n = 194 名老年人,包括在试验中接受 CGM [n = 100] 和 BGM [n = 94] 的参与者)。策略树和决策列表算法与 14 项基线人口统计学、临床和实验室指标相匹配。主要结果是 CGM 测定的处于低血糖范围的时间百分比(结果:最佳决策规则是一个包含 3 个步骤的决策列表。第一步将基线低血糖时间范围>1.35%且未检测到 C 肽水平的 WISDM 参与者移至 CGM 亚组(n = 139),第二步将基线低血糖时间范围>6.45%的 WISDM 参与者移至 CGM 亚组(n = 18)。其余参与者(n = 37)留在 BGM 分组中。与 BGM 亚组(n = 37;19%)相比,CGM 将低血糖降至最低的一组(n = 157;81%)基线低血糖更多,可检测到的 C 肽比例更低,血糖变异性更高,病程更长,使用胰岛素泵的比例更高:该决策规则强调了 CGM 对老年人减少低血糖症的益处。诊断性 CGM 和实验室标记物可为治疗性 CGM 的决策提供信息,并确定 CGM 可作为减少低血糖的关键干预措施的老年人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (JDST) is a bi-monthly, peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Diabetes Technology Society. JDST covers scientific and clinical aspects of diabetes technology including glucose monitoring, insulin and metabolic peptide delivery, the artificial pancreas, digital health, precision medicine, social media, cybersecurity, software for modeling, physiologic monitoring, technology for managing obesity, and diagnostic tests of glycation. The journal also covers the development and use of mobile applications and wireless communication, as well as bioengineered tools such as MEMS, new biomaterials, and nanotechnology to develop new sensors. Articles in JDST cover both basic research and clinical applications of technologies being developed to help people with diabetes.
期刊最新文献
Glycemic and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Users of a New, Compact Automated Insulin Delivery System: A First Report. Artificial Intelligence to Diagnose Complications of Diabetes. Is Continuous Glucose Monitoring Feasible in Tribal India? Navigating the Benefits and Overcoming the Challenges. Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Derived Glycemic Phenotyping of Childhood Hypoglycemia due to Hyperinsulinism: A Year-long Prospective Nationwide Observational Study. Diabetes Technology Use in Special Populations: A Narrative Review of Psychosocial Factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1