10-year Historical Prospective Cohort Study of Calcium Phosphate-Blasted Acid-Etched Titanium Implants Placed in Different Ridges.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.11607/jomi.10055
Fausto Zamparini, Andrea Spinelli, Alessio Buonavoglia, Maria Giovanna Gandolfi, Carlo Prati
{"title":"10-year Historical Prospective Cohort Study of Calcium Phosphate-Blasted Acid-Etched Titanium Implants Placed in Different Ridges.","authors":"Fausto Zamparini,&nbsp;Andrea Spinelli,&nbsp;Alessio Buonavoglia,&nbsp;Maria Giovanna Gandolfi,&nbsp;Carlo Prati","doi":"10.11607/jomi.10055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To evaluate the survival rate and marginal bone level (MBL) of calcium phosphate-blasted acid-etched titanium implants placed in a cohort of patients with different ridges after a follow-up period of at least 10 years. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A total of 61 patients with a minimum implant follow-up of 10 years were selected for this historical prospective, best clinical practice cohort study. Between 2009 and 2012, 121 titanium implants were placed using a flap, flapless, or postextractive technique. The implant placement timing was performed according to pre-extractive diagnosis and divided into immediate (immediately after tooth extraction with an absence of infection), early (within 2 to 3 months with an acute periapical lesion), delayed (6 to 12 months from extraction with a large periapical infection), or late (> 12 months from extraction with healed edentulous ridges). All implants were loaded after 3 months with provisional and definitive cemented restorations. Periapical radiographs were taken before implant insertion and at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 96, and 120 months (T3, T6, T12, T24, T36, T48, T96, and T120, respectively). The MBL was calculated in single blind by an additional examiner. Linear logistic regression was performed to analyze statistically significant differences in relation to different operative variables at all evaluation times. Multilevel mixed logistic regression was made to evaluate the factors associated to MBL at 10 years (T120). <b>Results:</b> After 10 years, 47 patients and 92 implant restorations were analyzed, showing that 88 implants (95.6%) survived and 4 implants (4.4%) failed. The cumulative drop-out rate was 22.1%. Loosening and/or mobility was observed in a total of 9 abutments (9.7%) during the observational time. No other complications were reported. Implants placed with a flapless technique revealed a similar MBL to those placed with a flap technique. No significant differences were observed between the surgical techniques at T96 and T120. Immediate and early implants revealed a more stable MBL than both delayed and late implants up to T48. At longer evaluation times (T96 and T120), the MBL values were not statistically significant (<i>P</i> > .05). Narrower diameter implants (3.5 mm) revealed a higher bone loss when compared to the 4.1-mm- and 5.0-mm-diameters, especially in the first year from implant insertion (from T3 to T12) and at longer follow-up (T36 and T48). After that, the difference was reduced. Multilevel analysis showed that none of these variables appear to significantly influence MBL at 120 months. <b>Conclusions:</b> MBL was not influenced by surgical technique or implant placement timing after 10 years. Maintaining a strict occlusal and hygiene control created the conditions to preserve bone integrity and achieve a high implant survival rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":50298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the survival rate and marginal bone level (MBL) of calcium phosphate-blasted acid-etched titanium implants placed in a cohort of patients with different ridges after a follow-up period of at least 10 years. Materials and Methods: A total of 61 patients with a minimum implant follow-up of 10 years were selected for this historical prospective, best clinical practice cohort study. Between 2009 and 2012, 121 titanium implants were placed using a flap, flapless, or postextractive technique. The implant placement timing was performed according to pre-extractive diagnosis and divided into immediate (immediately after tooth extraction with an absence of infection), early (within 2 to 3 months with an acute periapical lesion), delayed (6 to 12 months from extraction with a large periapical infection), or late (> 12 months from extraction with healed edentulous ridges). All implants were loaded after 3 months with provisional and definitive cemented restorations. Periapical radiographs were taken before implant insertion and at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 96, and 120 months (T3, T6, T12, T24, T36, T48, T96, and T120, respectively). The MBL was calculated in single blind by an additional examiner. Linear logistic regression was performed to analyze statistically significant differences in relation to different operative variables at all evaluation times. Multilevel mixed logistic regression was made to evaluate the factors associated to MBL at 10 years (T120). Results: After 10 years, 47 patients and 92 implant restorations were analyzed, showing that 88 implants (95.6%) survived and 4 implants (4.4%) failed. The cumulative drop-out rate was 22.1%. Loosening and/or mobility was observed in a total of 9 abutments (9.7%) during the observational time. No other complications were reported. Implants placed with a flapless technique revealed a similar MBL to those placed with a flap technique. No significant differences were observed between the surgical techniques at T96 and T120. Immediate and early implants revealed a more stable MBL than both delayed and late implants up to T48. At longer evaluation times (T96 and T120), the MBL values were not statistically significant (P > .05). Narrower diameter implants (3.5 mm) revealed a higher bone loss when compared to the 4.1-mm- and 5.0-mm-diameters, especially in the first year from implant insertion (from T3 to T12) and at longer follow-up (T36 and T48). After that, the difference was reduced. Multilevel analysis showed that none of these variables appear to significantly influence MBL at 120 months. Conclusions: MBL was not influenced by surgical technique or implant placement timing after 10 years. Maintaining a strict occlusal and hygiene control created the conditions to preserve bone integrity and achieve a high implant survival rate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放置在不同山脊的磷酸钙冲击酸蚀钛植入物的10年历史前瞻性队列研究。
目的:评估在不同脊的患者队列中放置磷酸钙喷砂酸蚀钛植入物至少10年的随访期后的生存率和边缘骨水平(MBL)。材料和方法:共选择61名患者进行这项历史前瞻性、最佳临床实践队列研究,他们的植入随访时间至少为10年。2009年至2012年间,使用皮瓣、无瓣或后提取技术植入了121个钛植入物。植入物的放置时间根据拔出前的诊断进行,并分为立即(在没有感染的情况下拔出牙齿后立即)、早期(在急性根尖周病变的2至3个月内)、延迟(在巨大根尖周感染的拔出后6至12个月)或晚期(在无牙嵴愈合的情况下提取后>12个月)。所有植入物均在3个月后进行临时和最终的骨水泥修复。在植入物之前以及3、6、12、24、36、48、96和120个月时(分别为T3、T6、T12、T24、T36、T48、T96和T120)拍摄根尖周射线照片。MBL由一名额外的检查者在单盲中计算。采用线性逻辑回归分析在所有评估时间与不同手术变量之间的统计学显著差异。对10年(T120)MBL的相关因素进行多水平混合logistic回归分析。结果:10年后,对47例患者和92例种植体修复体进行了分析,结果显示88例(95.6%)种植体存活,4例(4.4%)种植体失败。累计脱落率为22.1%。在观察时间内,共有9个基牙(9.7%)出现松动和/或活动。没有其他并发症的报告。采用无瓣技术植入的植入物显示出与采用瓣技术植入者相似的MBL。T96和T120的手术技术之间没有观察到显著差异。在T48之前,即刻和早期植入显示出比延迟和晚期植入更稳定的MBL。在较长的评估时间(T96和T120),MBL值没有统计学意义(P>0.05)。与4.1和5.0毫米直径相比,直径较小的植入物(3.5毫米)显示出更高的骨损失,尤其是在植入物后的第一年(从T3到T12)和较长的随访(T36和T48)。之后,差异缩小了。多水平分析显示,在120个月时,这些变量似乎都没有显著影响MBL。结论:10年后MBL不受手术技术或植入时间的影响。保持严格的咬合和卫生控制为保持骨骼完整性和实现高植入物存活率创造了条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Edited by Steven E. Eckert, DDS, MS ISSN (Print): 0882-2786 ISSN (Online): 1942-4434 This highly regarded, often-cited journal integrates clinical and scientific data to improve methods and results of oral and maxillofacial implant therapy. It presents pioneering research, technology, clinical applications, reviews of the literature, seminal studies, emerging technology, position papers, and consensus studies, as well as the many clinical and therapeutic innovations that ensue as a result of these efforts. The editorial board is composed of recognized opinion leaders in their respective areas of expertise and reflects the international reach of the journal. Under their leadership, JOMI maintains its strong scientific integrity while expanding its influence within the field of implant dentistry. JOMI’s popular regular feature "Thematic Abstract Review" presents a review of abstracts of recently published articles on a specific topical area of interest each issue.
期刊最新文献
Peri-implant Parameters of Dental Implants Inserted in Prefabricated Microvascular Fibular Flaps: A Retrospective Study. Different Surgical Techniques in the All-on-4 Treatment Concept: Evaluation of the Stress Distribution Created in Implant and Peripheral Bone with Finite Element Analysis. Augmentation of Peri-implant Keratinized Mucosa Using a Combination of Free Gingival Graft Strip with Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix or Free Gingival Graft Alone: A Randomized Controlled Study. Efficacy of Labial Split-Thickness Eversion Periosteoplasty for Soft Tissue Management in Posterior Mandibular Horizontal Ridge Augmentation Procedures: A Prospective Clinical Study. Porcine Resorbable Collagen Matrix Shows Good Incorporation of Liquid Platelet-Rich Fibrin In Vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1