Lower corticospinal excitability and greater fatigue among people with multiple sclerosis experiencing pain.

Hannah M Murphy, Christopher M Fetter, Nicholas J Snow, Arthur R Chaves, Matthew B Downer, Michelle Ploughman
{"title":"Lower corticospinal excitability and greater fatigue among people with multiple sclerosis experiencing pain.","authors":"Hannah M Murphy,&nbsp;Christopher M Fetter,&nbsp;Nicholas J Snow,&nbsp;Arthur R Chaves,&nbsp;Matthew B Downer,&nbsp;Michelle Ploughman","doi":"10.1177/20552173221143398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) frequently report pain that negatively affects their quality of life. Evidence linking pain and corticospinal excitability in MS is sparse. We aimed to (1) examine differences in corticospinal excitability in MS participants with and without pain and (2) explore predictors of pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-four participants rated their pain severity on a visual analog scale (VAS). Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and validated clinical instruments characterized corticospinal excitability and subjective disease features like mood and fatigue. We retrieved information on participants' prescriptions and disability status from their clinical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five percent of participants reported pain that affected their daily functioning. Persons with pain had significantly greater fatigue and lower area under the excitatory motor evoked potential (MEP) recruitment curve (eREC AUC), a measure of total corticospinal excitability. After controlling for age, disability status, and pain medications, increased fatigue and decreased eREC AUC together explained 40% of the variance in pain.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Pain in MS is multifactorial and relates to both greater fatigue and lesser corticospinal excitability. Future work should better characterize relationships between these outcomes to develop targeted pain interventions such as neuromodulation.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>We examined pain in MS. Individuals with pain had higher fatigue and lower corticospinal excitability than those without pain. These outcomes significantly predicted self-reported pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":18961,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical","volume":"9 1","pages":"20552173221143398"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9830099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552173221143398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) frequently report pain that negatively affects their quality of life. Evidence linking pain and corticospinal excitability in MS is sparse. We aimed to (1) examine differences in corticospinal excitability in MS participants with and without pain and (2) explore predictors of pain.

Methods: Sixty-four participants rated their pain severity on a visual analog scale (VAS). Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and validated clinical instruments characterized corticospinal excitability and subjective disease features like mood and fatigue. We retrieved information on participants' prescriptions and disability status from their clinical records.

Results: Fifty-five percent of participants reported pain that affected their daily functioning. Persons with pain had significantly greater fatigue and lower area under the excitatory motor evoked potential (MEP) recruitment curve (eREC AUC), a measure of total corticospinal excitability. After controlling for age, disability status, and pain medications, increased fatigue and decreased eREC AUC together explained 40% of the variance in pain.

Discussion: Pain in MS is multifactorial and relates to both greater fatigue and lesser corticospinal excitability. Future work should better characterize relationships between these outcomes to develop targeted pain interventions such as neuromodulation.

Summary: We examined pain in MS. Individuals with pain had higher fatigue and lower corticospinal excitability than those without pain. These outcomes significantly predicted self-reported pain.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经历疼痛的多发性硬化症患者的低皮质脊髓兴奋性和更大的疲劳。
简介:患有多发性硬化症(MS)的人经常报告疼痛对他们的生活质量产生负面影响。MS患者疼痛与皮质脊髓兴奋性相关的证据很少。我们的目的是(1)检查有疼痛和没有疼痛的MS参与者皮质脊髓兴奋性的差异,(2)探索疼痛的预测因素。方法:64名受试者用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评定疼痛严重程度。经颅磁刺激(TMS)和经过验证的临床仪器表征了皮质脊髓兴奋性和主观疾病特征,如情绪和疲劳。我们从参与者的临床记录中检索他们的处方和残疾状况信息。结果:55%的参与者报告疼痛影响了他们的日常活动。疼痛患者明显有更大的疲劳感和更低的兴奋性运动诱发电位(MEP)募集曲线下的面积(eREC AUC),这是皮质脊髓总兴奋性的测量。在控制了年龄、残疾状况和止痛药后,疲劳增加和eREC AUC下降共同解释了40%的疼痛差异。讨论:多发性硬化症的疼痛是多因素的,与更大的疲劳和更少的皮质脊髓兴奋性有关。未来的工作应该更好地描述这些结果之间的关系,以开发有针对性的疼痛干预措施,如神经调节。总结:我们研究了多发性硬化症患者的疼痛,与无疼痛的患者相比,有疼痛的患者有更高的疲劳度和更低的皮质脊髓兴奋性。这些结果显著地预测了自我报告的疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cannabinoids for spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Treatment effect modifiers of immunotherapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cesarian sections in women with multiple sclerosis: A Canadian prospective pregnancy study. Exploring the relationship between neurologists and older persons with multiple sclerosis through the lens of social support theory. Illness representation in patients with multiple sclerosis: A preliminary narrative medicine study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1