Reference intervals for thyroid disorders calculated by indirect method and comparison with reference change values.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Biochemia Medica Pub Date : 2023-02-15 DOI:10.11613/BM.2023.010704
Zeynep Yildiz, Lale Köroğlu Dağdelen
{"title":"Reference intervals for thyroid disorders calculated by indirect method and comparison with reference change values.","authors":"Zeynep Yildiz,&nbsp;Lale Köroğlu Dağdelen","doi":"10.11613/BM.2023.010704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the study was to calculate reference intervals (RIs) for thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (fT4) and free triiodothyronine (fT3) and evaluate the clinical significance of these intervals by use of reference change values (RCV) of the analytes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Laboratory patient data between August and December 2021 were evaluated for the study. A total of 188,912 patients with TSH, fT4, fT3, anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies (Anti-TPO) and anti-thyroglobulin antibodies (Anti-Tg) results were evaluated. All measurements were performed on Cobas c801 (Roche Diagnostics, Penzberg, Germany) using electrochemiluminescence immunoassay technology. Estimated RIs were compared with manufacturer's by means of RCVs of analytes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thyroid stimulating hormone values didn't differ significantly by gender and age. The combined RIs for whole group (N = 28,437) was found as 0.41-4.37 mIU/mL. Free T4 values (11.6-20.1 pmol/L, N = 13,479 in male; 10.5-19.5 pmol/L, N = 17,634 female) and fT3 values (3.38-6.35 pmol/L, N = 2,516 in male; 3.39-5.99 pmol/L, N = 3,348 pmol/L in female) significantly differed by gender (P < 0.050). Both fT4 and fT3 values also showed significant differences in age subgroups comparisons. So, male and female RIs were represented separately for age subgroups. When compared with manufacturer's RIs, TSH whole group and fT4 subgroups RIs didn't exceed the analytes' RCVs, but this difference was greater for fT3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reference interval estimation by use of indirect method out of laboratory data may be more accurate than manufacturer provided RIs. This population based RIs evaluated using RCV of analytes may provide useful information in clinical interpretation of laboratory results.</p>","PeriodicalId":9021,"journal":{"name":"Biochemia Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9807239/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2023.010704","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the study was to calculate reference intervals (RIs) for thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (fT4) and free triiodothyronine (fT3) and evaluate the clinical significance of these intervals by use of reference change values (RCV) of the analytes.

Materials and methods: Laboratory patient data between August and December 2021 were evaluated for the study. A total of 188,912 patients with TSH, fT4, fT3, anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies (Anti-TPO) and anti-thyroglobulin antibodies (Anti-Tg) results were evaluated. All measurements were performed on Cobas c801 (Roche Diagnostics, Penzberg, Germany) using electrochemiluminescence immunoassay technology. Estimated RIs were compared with manufacturer's by means of RCVs of analytes.

Results: Thyroid stimulating hormone values didn't differ significantly by gender and age. The combined RIs for whole group (N = 28,437) was found as 0.41-4.37 mIU/mL. Free T4 values (11.6-20.1 pmol/L, N = 13,479 in male; 10.5-19.5 pmol/L, N = 17,634 female) and fT3 values (3.38-6.35 pmol/L, N = 2,516 in male; 3.39-5.99 pmol/L, N = 3,348 pmol/L in female) significantly differed by gender (P < 0.050). Both fT4 and fT3 values also showed significant differences in age subgroups comparisons. So, male and female RIs were represented separately for age subgroups. When compared with manufacturer's RIs, TSH whole group and fT4 subgroups RIs didn't exceed the analytes' RCVs, but this difference was greater for fT3.

Conclusions: Reference interval estimation by use of indirect method out of laboratory data may be more accurate than manufacturer provided RIs. This population based RIs evaluated using RCV of analytes may provide useful information in clinical interpretation of laboratory results.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用间接法计算甲状腺疾病的参考区间,并与参考变化值进行比较。
本研究的目的是计算促甲状腺激素(TSH)、游离甲状腺素(fT4)和游离三碘甲状腺原氨酸(fT3)的参考区间(RIs),并利用分析物的参考变化值(RCV)评价这些区间的临床意义。材料和方法:对2021年8月至12月的实验室患者数据进行评估。共评价188,912例患者TSH、fT4、fT3、抗甲状腺过氧化物酶抗体(Anti-TPO)和抗甲状腺球蛋白抗体(Anti-Tg)结果。所有测量均采用电化学发光免疫分析技术在Cobas c801 (Roche Diagnostics, Penzberg, Germany)上进行。通过分析物的rcv将估计的RIs与制造商的RIs进行比较。结果:促甲状腺激素值在性别、年龄上无显著差异。全组(N = 28,437)的综合RIs为0.41 ~ 4.37 mIU/mL。游离T4值(11.6 ~ 20.1 pmol/L, N = 13,479);10.5 ~ 19.5 pmol/L,女性N = 17,634)和fT3值(3.38 ~ 6.35 pmol/L,男性N = 2,516;3.39 ~ 5.99 pmol/L,女性N = 3348 pmol/L),性别差异显著(P < 0.050)。fT4和fT3值在年龄亚组比较中也显示出显著差异。因此,男性和女性RIs分别代表年龄亚组。与制造商的RIs相比,TSH全组和fT4亚组的RIs没有超过分析者的rcv,但fT3的差异更大。结论:利用实验室数据外的间接方法估计参考区间可能比制造商提供的RIs更准确。使用分析物的RCV评估基于人群的RIs可能为实验室结果的临床解释提供有用的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biochemia Medica
Biochemia Medica 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biochemia Medica is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Journal provides a wide coverage of research in all aspects of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. Following categories fit into the scope of the Journal: general clinical chemistry, haematology and haemostasis, molecular diagnostics and endocrinology. Development, validation and verification of analytical techniques and methods applicable to clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine are welcome as well as studies dealing with laboratory organization, automation and quality control. Journal publishes on a regular basis educative preanalytical case reports (Preanalytical mysteries), articles dealing with applied biostatistics (Lessons in biostatistics) and research integrity (Research integrity corner).
期刊最新文献
Quality assurance of add-on testing in plasma samples: stability limit for 29 biochemical analytes Two cases with discrepancy in the quantitative cytological assessment of cerebrospinal fluid in neonatal samples using light microscopy in comparison with Sysmex XN-1000 Common P-glycoprotein () polymorphisms do not seem to be associated with the risk of rivaroxaban-related bleeding events: Preliminary data CLSI-based verification and establishment of reference intervals for common biochemical assays in Croatian newborns Prediction interval: A powerful statistical tool for monitoring patients and analytical systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1