Efficacy of Massage on Pain Intensity in Post-Cesarean Women: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hammad A Fadlalmola, Abdelhadi A Mohammed, Huda H Abedelwahed, Amani A Mohammed, Amani A E Taha, Rasha A Ali, Amani M M Abdelrahman, Zahra H Hazazi, Asia S Mohamed, Manal H Fatahalrahman, Anwar B Eltom, Amel E Banaga, Salwa A M Mohmed, Alawia A Elshaikh, Amna M Ali, Ashraf A Elbashir, Randa A Basheer, Wargaa H Taha, Eman M Ebrahim, Elturabi E Ebrahim
{"title":"Efficacy of Massage on Pain Intensity in Post-Cesarean Women: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Hammad A Fadlalmola,&nbsp;Abdelhadi A Mohammed,&nbsp;Huda H Abedelwahed,&nbsp;Amani A Mohammed,&nbsp;Amani A E Taha,&nbsp;Rasha A Ali,&nbsp;Amani M M Abdelrahman,&nbsp;Zahra H Hazazi,&nbsp;Asia S Mohamed,&nbsp;Manal H Fatahalrahman,&nbsp;Anwar B Eltom,&nbsp;Amel E Banaga,&nbsp;Salwa A M Mohmed,&nbsp;Alawia A Elshaikh,&nbsp;Amna M Ali,&nbsp;Ashraf A Elbashir,&nbsp;Randa A Basheer,&nbsp;Wargaa H Taha,&nbsp;Eman M Ebrahim,&nbsp;Elturabi E Ebrahim","doi":"10.3822/ijtmb.v16i3.861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cesarean section is a common surgical procedure that may be considered a safe alternative to natural birth and helps to resolve numerous obstetric conditions. Still, the Cesarean section is painful; relieving pain after a Cesarean section is crucial, therefore analgesia is necessary for the postoperative period. However, analgesia is not free of complications and contraindications, so massage may be a cost-effective method for decreasing pain post-Cesarean. Our study aims to determine the massage role in pain intensity after Cesarean sections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched five electronic databases for relevant studies. Data were extracted from the included studies after screening procedures. We calculated the pooled mean difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD) for our continuous outcomes, using random or fixed-effect meta-analysis according to heterogenicity status. Interventional studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool, while observational studies were assessed using the National Institutes of Health's tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 10 RCTs and five observational studies conducted with over 1,595 post-Cesarean women. The pooled MDs for pain intensity considering baseline values either immediately or post 60-90 minutes were favoring the massagegroup over the control group as follows:(stand. MD = -2.64, 95% CI [-3.80, -1.48], <i>p</i> >.00001; MD = -2.64, 95% CI [-3.80, -1.48], <i>p</i> >.00001, respectively). While pooled MDsregarding post-intervention only eitherimmediately or post 60-90 minutes were:(stand. MD = -2.04, 95% CI [-3.26, -0.82], <i>p</i> =.001; stand. MD = -2.62, 95% CI [-3.52, -1.72],<i>p</i> > .00001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found that using massage was superior to the control groups in decreasing pain intensity either when the pain was assessed immediately after or 60-90 minutes post-massage application.</p>","PeriodicalId":39090,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork: Research, Education, and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/de/8c/ijtmb-16-44.PMC10442221.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork: Research, Education, and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3822/ijtmb.v16i3.861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cesarean section is a common surgical procedure that may be considered a safe alternative to natural birth and helps to resolve numerous obstetric conditions. Still, the Cesarean section is painful; relieving pain after a Cesarean section is crucial, therefore analgesia is necessary for the postoperative period. However, analgesia is not free of complications and contraindications, so massage may be a cost-effective method for decreasing pain post-Cesarean. Our study aims to determine the massage role in pain intensity after Cesarean sections.

Methods: We searched five electronic databases for relevant studies. Data were extracted from the included studies after screening procedures. We calculated the pooled mean difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD) for our continuous outcomes, using random or fixed-effect meta-analysis according to heterogenicity status. Interventional studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool, while observational studies were assessed using the National Institutes of Health's tools.

Results: Our study included 10 RCTs and five observational studies conducted with over 1,595 post-Cesarean women. The pooled MDs for pain intensity considering baseline values either immediately or post 60-90 minutes were favoring the massagegroup over the control group as follows:(stand. MD = -2.64, 95% CI [-3.80, -1.48], p >.00001; MD = -2.64, 95% CI [-3.80, -1.48], p >.00001, respectively). While pooled MDsregarding post-intervention only eitherimmediately or post 60-90 minutes were:(stand. MD = -2.04, 95% CI [-3.26, -0.82], p =.001; stand. MD = -2.62, 95% CI [-3.52, -1.72],p > .00001, respectively).

Conclusion: Our study found that using massage was superior to the control groups in decreasing pain intensity either when the pain was assessed immediately after or 60-90 minutes post-massage application.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
按摩对剖宫产后疼痛强度的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:剖宫产是一种常见的外科手术,可以被认为是自然分娩的安全选择,并有助于解决许多产科疾病。不过,剖宫产还是很痛苦的;剖宫产术后疼痛的缓解是至关重要的,因此术后镇痛是必要的。然而,镇痛并非没有并发症和禁忌症,因此按摩可能是减少剖宫产后疼痛的一种经济有效的方法。我们的研究旨在确定按摩在剖宫产术后疼痛强度中的作用。方法:检索5个电子数据库进行相关研究。筛选程序后从纳入的研究中提取数据。我们根据异质性状况使用随机或固定效应荟萃分析,计算了连续结果的汇总平均差(MD)和标准化平均差(SMD)。使用Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具评估干预性研究的方法学质量,而使用美国国立卫生研究院的工具评估观察性研究。结果:我们的研究包括10项随机对照试验和5项观察性研究,共对1595名剖宫产后妇女进行了研究。考虑到立即或60-90分钟后的基线值,按摩组的疼痛强度累积MDs优于对照组,如下所示:MD = -2.64, 95% CI [-3.80, -1.48], p >.00001;MD = -2.64, 95% CI [-3.80, -1.48], p >。00001年,分别)。而仅在干预后立即或60-90分钟后汇总的mds为:MD = -2.04, 95% CI [-3.26, -0.82], p =.001;的立场。MD = -2.62, 95% CI [-3.52, -1.72], p > .00001,分别)。结论:我们的研究发现,按摩在减轻疼痛强度方面优于对照组,无论是在按摩后立即评估疼痛还是在按摩后60-90分钟评估疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The IJTMB is a peer-reviewed journal focusing on the research (methodological, physiological, and clinical) and professional development of therapeutic massage and bodywork and its providers, encompassing all allied health providers whose services include manually applied therapeutic massage and bodywork. The Journal provides a professional forum for editorial input; scientifically-based articles of a research, educational, and practice-oriented nature; readers’ commentaries on journal content and related professional matters; and pertinent news and announcements.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Lavender Oil Leg Massage on Physical, Cognitive, and Psychological Variables of Patients with Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Effectiveness of Medical Massage in Reducing Neck Pain Among Multiple Occupational Groups: A Longitudinal Study. Ergonomic Considerations for Practicing Massage Therapists. Exploring the Efficacy of Plantar Reflexology as a Complementary Approach for Headache Management: A Comprehensive Review. The Pillars of the IJTMB-Exploring TMB Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1