Adding Insult to Injury: Everyday Discrimination Moderates Stressor-Related Negative Affect.

IF 2 4区医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-14 DOI:10.1080/08964289.2022.2092441

Amandeep Kaur, Susan T Charles, Kristine M Molina, David M Almeida

{"title":"Adding Insult to Injury: Everyday Discrimination Moderates Stressor-Related Negative Affect.","authors":"Amandeep Kaur, Susan T Charles, Kristine M Molina, David M Almeida","doi":"10.1080/08964289.2022.2092441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies examining the effects of discrimination on emotional well-being have often overlooked (a) differential effects of both everyday and lifetime discrimination and (b) how both types of discrimination may exacerbate stressor-related affect-even when daily stressors are unrelated to discrimination. The current study examined the effects of daily stressors not attributed to discrimination (i.e., nondiscrimination-related daily stressors) on daily negative and positive affect in the presence of either form of discrimination (everyday and lifetime). Participants who completed the second wave of the Survey of Midlife Development in the US (MIDUS-II) and the National Study of Daily Experiences (NSDE-II) answered questionnaires about everyday and lifetime discrimination. Later, they completed daily phone interviews across 8 consecutive days, asking about the nondiscrimination-related daily stressors and the positive and negative affect they had experienced that day. Multilevel model analyses revealed that everyday discrimination was associated with decreased daily positive affect and lifetime discrimination was associated with increased daily negative affect. Moreover, higher frequency of everyday discrimination exacerbated the within-person effects of nondiscriminatory daily stressors on negative affect. Results underscore the importance of considering both independent and synergistic effects of discrimination on daily emotional well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":55395,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9839892/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2022.2092441","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies examining the effects of discrimination on emotional well-being have often overlooked (a) differential effects of both everyday and lifetime discrimination and (b) how both types of discrimination may exacerbate stressor-related affect-even when daily stressors are unrelated to discrimination. The current study examined the effects of daily stressors not attributed to discrimination (i.e., nondiscrimination-related daily stressors) on daily negative and positive affect in the presence of either form of discrimination (everyday and lifetime). Participants who completed the second wave of the Survey of Midlife Development in the US (MIDUS-II) and the National Study of Daily Experiences (NSDE-II) answered questionnaires about everyday and lifetime discrimination. Later, they completed daily phone interviews across 8 consecutive days, asking about the nondiscrimination-related daily stressors and the positive and negative affect they had experienced that day. Multilevel model analyses revealed that everyday discrimination was associated with decreased daily positive affect and lifetime discrimination was associated with increased daily negative affect. Moreover, higher frequency of everyday discrimination exacerbated the within-person effects of nondiscriminatory daily stressors on negative affect. Results underscore the importance of considering both independent and synergistic effects of discrimination on daily emotional well-being.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

雪上加霜：日常歧视调节与压力相关的负性情绪。

有关歧视对情绪健康影响的研究往往忽视了（a）日常歧视和终生歧视的不同影响，以及（b）这两种类型的歧视会如何加剧与压力相关的情绪--即使日常压力与歧视无关。本研究考察了在存在任何一种形式的歧视（日常歧视和终生歧视）的情况下，与歧视无关的日常压力源（即与歧视无关的日常压力源）对日常消极和积极情绪的影响。完成美国中年发展调查（MIDUS-II）第二波和全国日常经历研究（NSDE-II）的参与者回答了有关日常和终生歧视的问卷。之后，他们在连续 8 天内完成了每日电话访谈，询问与歧视无关的日常压力以及当天经历的积极和消极情绪。多层次模型分析表明，日常歧视与每日积极情绪的减少有关，而终生歧视与每日消极情绪的增加有关。此外，日常歧视的频率越高，非歧视性的日常压力因素对消极情绪的人际影响就越大。研究结果强调了考虑歧视对日常情绪健康的独立和协同效应的重要性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Behavioral Medicine 医学-行为科学

CiteScore

5.30

自引率

4.30%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal, which fosters and promotes the exchange of knowledge and the advancement of theory in the field of behavioral medicine, including but not limited to understandings of disease prevention, health promotion, health disparities, identification of health risk factors, and interventions designed to reduce health risks, ameliorate health disparities, enhancing all aspects of health. The journal seeks to advance knowledge and theory in these domains in all segments of the population and across the lifespan, in local, national, and global contexts, and with an emphasis on the synergies that exist between biological, psychological, psychosocial, and structural factors as they related to these areas of study and across health states. Behavioral Medicine publishes original empirical studies (experimental and observational research studies, quantitative and qualitative studies, evaluation studies) as well as clinical/case studies. The journal also publishes review articles, which provide systematic evaluations of the literature and propose alternative and innovative theoretical paradigms, as well as brief reports and responses to articles previously published in Behavioral Medicine.