Standardized Nursing Examination Remediation: A Program Evaluation.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Nursing Education Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.3928/01484834-20230712-09
Jeanette M Olsen, Dalete Mota, Catherine Wildenberg, Rita J Donahue, Regan Thomas, Nicole Willmus
{"title":"Standardized Nursing Examination Remediation: A Program Evaluation.","authors":"Jeanette M Olsen,&nbsp;Dalete Mota,&nbsp;Catherine Wildenberg,&nbsp;Rita J Donahue,&nbsp;Regan Thomas,&nbsp;Nicole Willmus","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20230712-09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nurse educators at a public university expanded their standardized examination program in Spring 2020 to include more specialty examinations, required remediation, and retesting for students who did not attain benchmark scores. This study conducted a remediation-focused program evaluation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A mixed-methods design was used. Aggregated deidentified Health Education Systems, Inc. (HESI) specialty examination scores (<i>n</i> = 907) were analyzed. Feedback from nursing students and recent alumni (<i>n</i> = 70) was collected using a Qualtrics survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For students scoring under benchmark, higher remediation time requirements led to greater increases in second-attempt specialty examination scores. More alumni than current students reported remediation was helpful (<i>p</i> = .029). Participants' perspectives regarding remediation barriers, helpful strategies, and motivating policies were identified. Five themes emerged from open-ended survey comments, adding depth to the quantitative findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recommendations for standardized examination remediation strategies and policies are offered. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2023;62(9):519-522.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":54781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Education","volume":"62 9","pages":"519-522"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20230712-09","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nurse educators at a public university expanded their standardized examination program in Spring 2020 to include more specialty examinations, required remediation, and retesting for students who did not attain benchmark scores. This study conducted a remediation-focused program evaluation.

Method: A mixed-methods design was used. Aggregated deidentified Health Education Systems, Inc. (HESI) specialty examination scores (n = 907) were analyzed. Feedback from nursing students and recent alumni (n = 70) was collected using a Qualtrics survey.

Results: For students scoring under benchmark, higher remediation time requirements led to greater increases in second-attempt specialty examination scores. More alumni than current students reported remediation was helpful (p = .029). Participants' perspectives regarding remediation barriers, helpful strategies, and motivating policies were identified. Five themes emerged from open-ended survey comments, adding depth to the quantitative findings.

Conclusion: Recommendations for standardized examination remediation strategies and policies are offered. [J Nurs Educ. 2023;62(9):519-522.].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
标准化护理考试补救:一个项目评估。
背景:2020年春季,一所公立大学的护士教育工作者扩大了他们的标准化考试计划,包括更多的专业考试,要求补考,并为未达到基准分数的学生重新测试。本研究进行了以补救为重点的项目评估。方法:采用混合方法设计。汇总鉴定健康教育系统公司(HESI)专业考试成绩(n = 907)进行分析。从护理专业学生和最近的校友(n = 70)收集反馈使用质量调查。结果:成绩低于基准的学生,补习时间要求越高,专业复试成绩提高幅度越大。与在校生相比,更多的校友认为补习有帮助(p = 0.029)。确定了参与者关于补救障碍、有用策略和激励政策的观点。从开放式调查评论中出现了五个主题,增加了定量调查结果的深度。结论:对标准化考试的补救策略和政策提出了建议。[J].中国生物医学工程学报,2009;22(6):519-522。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Education is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles and new ideas for nurse educators in various types and levels of nursing programs for over 50 years. The Journal enhances the teaching-learning process, promotes curriculum development, and stimulates creative innovation and research in nursing education.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the Power of NursingTM on Classroom Connectedness. Unveiling the SChematic Organization of Pharmacological Information for Nurses: A New Approach to Pharmacology Education for Nurses. Simulation Experiences Focusing on Addressing Culturally Based Hidden Bias and RacisM (A-CHARM). Simulation Expert Modeling to Teach Sensitive Screening in Nursing Education. Incorporating Social Needs Screening in Simulation for Family Nurse Practitioner Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1