Behavioral contrast: An exploratory survey of practitioner experiences

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of applied behavior analysis Pub Date : 2023-09-07 DOI:10.1002/jaba.1022
Megan A. Boyle, Ximena Uribe-Zarain, Ann M. Powell
{"title":"Behavioral contrast: An exploratory survey of practitioner experiences","authors":"Megan A. Boyle,&nbsp;Ximena Uribe-Zarain,&nbsp;Ann M. Powell","doi":"10.1002/jaba.1022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Behavioral contrast</i> is defined as a change in reinforcement conditions in one context that causes a change in behavior in the opposite direction in another, unchanged context. Although behavioral contrast has implications for applied behavior analysts, researchers have not examined ramifications or identified common methods of mitigating contrast in applied settings. Therefore, we surveyed Board Certified Behavior Analysts in an exploratory investigation to determine practitioner experiences with behavioral contrast. Participants' responses reflected a variety of themes: contrast resulted in conversations with stakeholders; supporting stakeholders and mitigating factors are important; contrast is due to inconsistencies across settings; and contrast affects stakeholder buy-in, hurts rapport or relationships, and produces negative emotions. Our results suggest that contrast is not an innocuous occurrence in applied settings. We recommend a variety of areas for future research to further predict and control contrast and to identify the extent to which it affects clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","volume":"56 4","pages":"842-852"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaba.1022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Behavioral contrast is defined as a change in reinforcement conditions in one context that causes a change in behavior in the opposite direction in another, unchanged context. Although behavioral contrast has implications for applied behavior analysts, researchers have not examined ramifications or identified common methods of mitigating contrast in applied settings. Therefore, we surveyed Board Certified Behavior Analysts in an exploratory investigation to determine practitioner experiences with behavioral contrast. Participants' responses reflected a variety of themes: contrast resulted in conversations with stakeholders; supporting stakeholders and mitigating factors are important; contrast is due to inconsistencies across settings; and contrast affects stakeholder buy-in, hurts rapport or relationships, and produces negative emotions. Our results suggest that contrast is not an innocuous occurrence in applied settings. We recommend a variety of areas for future research to further predict and control contrast and to identify the extent to which it affects clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行为对比:对从业者经历的探索性调查。
行为对比被定义为在一个上下文中强化条件的变化,导致在另一个未改变的上下文中行为朝相反方向变化。尽管行为对比对应用行为分析师有影响,但研究人员尚未研究在应用环境中减轻对比的后果或确定常见方法。因此,我们在一项探索性调查中调查了委员会认证的行为分析师,以确定具有行为对比的从业者体验。与会者的答复反映了各种主题:对比导致了与利益攸关方的对话;支持利益相关者和缓解因素很重要;对比度是由于设置之间的不一致;对比会影响利益相关者的认同,损害融洽关系,并产生负面情绪。我们的研究结果表明,对比在应用环境中并非无害。我们建议未来研究的各个领域,以进一步预测和控制对比度,并确定其对临床实践的影响程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of applied behavior analysis
Journal of applied behavior analysis PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.70%
发文量
61
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the social acceptability of the Re-Connect concept: A smartphone-based, nonfinancial, contingency management intervention. Contingency management for monosubstance use disorders: Systematic review and assessment of predicted versus obtained effects. Choice versus no choice: Practical considerations for increasing choices. Functional analysis and treatment of problem behavior by domesticated canines. Effects of social interaction on leisure item preference and reinforcer efficacy for children with autism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1