Improved Medication Adherence with the Use of Extended-Release Tacrolimus in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.2 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Transplantation Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/7915781
Manisha Verma, Radi Zaki, Johnathan Sadeh, John P Knorr, Mark Gallagher, Afshin Parsikia, Victor Navarro
{"title":"Improved Medication Adherence with the Use of Extended-Release Tacrolimus in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Manisha Verma,&nbsp;Radi Zaki,&nbsp;Johnathan Sadeh,&nbsp;John P Knorr,&nbsp;Mark Gallagher,&nbsp;Afshin Parsikia,&nbsp;Victor Navarro","doi":"10.1155/2023/7915781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonadherence to immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients (LTRs) leads to deterioration in health outcomes. Once-dailyextended-release tacrolimus (TAC-ER) may improve adherence when compared to twice-dailyimmediate-release tacrolimus (TAC-IR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized controlled study to evaluate medication adherence, clinical efficacy, and safety of TAC-ER in stable LTR. All patients >18 years who underwent liver transplantation before 6 months were eligible. Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to continued TAC-IR or conversion to TAC-ER. The primary outcome was change in medication adherence from baseline to 9 months, assessed using BAASIS. Secondary outcomes were tacrolimus trough levels, safety, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one patients were consented and randomized to either of the two groups: conversion to TAC-ER (<i>n</i> = 15) or continued TAC-IR (<i>n</i> = 16). Six patients in the TAC-ER group withdrew after randomization due to apprehension about switching medication (<i>n</i> = 2), unwillingness to travel (<i>n</i> = 2), and increased liver tests after conversion (<i>n</i> = 2, both were acute rejections despite therapeutic tacrolimus levels and were considered unrelated to TAC-ER). We compared the results of nine patients in the TAC-ER group that completed the study with those of sixteen in the TAC-IR group. At baseline, there was no difference in tacrolimus trough levels between groups. Improved adherence was observed in the TAC-ER group as 100% of patients reported at least one period of full adherence during the study period (100% vs. 62.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.035). Tacrolimus trough levels and liver tests were comparable between groups throughout the study. There were no differences in eGFR, HbA1c, or QoL between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TAC-ER improved medication adherence while maintaining comparable trough levels, liver function, and QoL as TAC-IR in LTR.</p>","PeriodicalId":45795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transplantation","volume":"2023 ","pages":"7915781"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9833930/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7915781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Nonadherence to immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients (LTRs) leads to deterioration in health outcomes. Once-dailyextended-release tacrolimus (TAC-ER) may improve adherence when compared to twice-dailyimmediate-release tacrolimus (TAC-IR).

Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled study to evaluate medication adherence, clinical efficacy, and safety of TAC-ER in stable LTR. All patients >18 years who underwent liver transplantation before 6 months were eligible. Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to continued TAC-IR or conversion to TAC-ER. The primary outcome was change in medication adherence from baseline to 9 months, assessed using BAASIS. Secondary outcomes were tacrolimus trough levels, safety, and quality of life.

Results: Thirty-one patients were consented and randomized to either of the two groups: conversion to TAC-ER (n = 15) or continued TAC-IR (n = 16). Six patients in the TAC-ER group withdrew after randomization due to apprehension about switching medication (n = 2), unwillingness to travel (n = 2), and increased liver tests after conversion (n = 2, both were acute rejections despite therapeutic tacrolimus levels and were considered unrelated to TAC-ER). We compared the results of nine patients in the TAC-ER group that completed the study with those of sixteen in the TAC-IR group. At baseline, there was no difference in tacrolimus trough levels between groups. Improved adherence was observed in the TAC-ER group as 100% of patients reported at least one period of full adherence during the study period (100% vs. 62.6%, p = 0.035). Tacrolimus trough levels and liver tests were comparable between groups throughout the study. There were no differences in eGFR, HbA1c, or QoL between the groups.

Conclusion: TAC-ER improved medication adherence while maintaining comparable trough levels, liver function, and QoL as TAC-IR in LTR.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝移植受者使用缓释他克莫司改善药物依从性:一项随机对照试验。
背景:肝移植受者(LTRs)不坚持免疫抑制导致健康结果恶化。与每日两次速释他克莫司(TAC-IR)相比,每日一次缓释他克莫司(TAC-ER)可改善依从性。方法:采用随机对照研究,评价TAC-ER在稳定型LTR中的用药依从性、临床疗效和安全性,纳入年龄>18岁且6个月前行肝移植的患者。患者以1:1的比例随机分配到持续的TAC-IR或转换到TAC-ER。主要结局是用药依从性从基线到9个月的变化,使用basis进行评估。次要结局是他克莫司的低谷水平、安全性和生活质量。结果:31名患者被同意并随机分为两组:转入TAC-ER (n = 15)或继续TAC-IR (n = 16)。TAC-ER组中6例患者在随机分组后退出,原因是担心转换药物(n = 2),不愿意旅行(n = 2),转换后肝脏检查增加(n = 2,尽管治疗性他克莫司水平,但均为急性排斥反应,被认为与TAC-ER无关)。我们比较了完成研究的9名TAC-ER组患者和16名TAC-IR组患者的结果。基线时,两组间他克莫司谷底水平无差异。TAC-ER组的依从性得到改善,100%的患者报告在研究期间至少有一段时间完全依从(100% vs. 62.6%, p = 0.035)。在整个研究过程中,两组之间的他克莫司谷水平和肝脏测试具有可比性。两组间eGFR、HbA1c和生活质量均无差异。结论:与TAC-IR相比,TAC-ER改善了药物依从性,同时维持了相当的低谷水平、肝功能和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
4.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Evolving Kidney Donor Pool Shaping Outcomes in Graft Survival. Mapping International Collaboration and Research Trends in Artificial Intelligence Applications for Liver and Kidney Transplantation. Impact of Diverse Clinical Characteristics on Survival Benefit of Liver Transplantation. Predictive Models for Kidney Offer Acceptance: Challenges and Strategies. Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD): 24 Years of Experience at a Referral Center in São Paulo, Brazil. Can Differences in Prevalence and Subtype of EBV Infection in the Population Influence the Results? A Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1