“Student-led workshop strengthens perceived discussion skills and community in an interdisciplinary graduate program”

IF 2.5 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY FASEB bioAdvances Pub Date : 2022-10-17 DOI:10.1096/fba.2021-00165
Catharine Shipps, Kyra L. Thrush, Clorice R. Reinhardt, Sara A. Siwiecki, Jennifer L. Claydon, Dorottya B. Noble, Corey S. O'Hern
{"title":"“Student-led workshop strengthens perceived discussion skills and community in an interdisciplinary graduate program”","authors":"Catharine Shipps,&nbsp;Kyra L. Thrush,&nbsp;Clorice R. Reinhardt,&nbsp;Sara A. Siwiecki,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Claydon,&nbsp;Dorottya B. Noble,&nbsp;Corey S. O'Hern","doi":"10.1096/fba.2021-00165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Integrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology (IGPPEB) at Yale University brings together Ph.D. students from the physical, engineering, and biological sciences. The main goals of this program are for students to become comfortable working in an interdisciplinary and collaborative research environment and adept at communicating with scientists and nonscientists. To fill a student-identified learning gap in engaging in inclusive discussions, IGPPEB students developed a communication workshop to improve skills in visual engagement, citing specific content, constructive conversation entrances, and encouragement of peers. Based on short- and long-term assessment of the workshop, 100% of students reported that it should be offered to future cohorts and 63% of students perceived it to be personally helpful. Additionally, 92% of participants reported using one or more of the core skills beyond the course, with skills in “Encouraging peers” and “Constructive conversation entrances” rated the highest in perceived improvement. Based on the highest average rating of 76 ± 24 (on a scale of 0–100), students agreed that the workshop made them feel more welcome in the IGPPEB community. With a rating of 68 ± 13, they also agreed that the workshop had a positive impact on their graduate school experience. Participants provided suggestions for future improvements, such as increasing student involvement in leading discussions of course material. This study demonstrates that a student-led workshop can improve perceived discussion skills and build community across an interdisciplinary program in the sciences.</p>","PeriodicalId":12093,"journal":{"name":"FASEB bioAdvances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://faseb.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1096/fba.2021-00165","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FASEB bioAdvances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1096/fba.2021-00165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Integrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology (IGPPEB) at Yale University brings together Ph.D. students from the physical, engineering, and biological sciences. The main goals of this program are for students to become comfortable working in an interdisciplinary and collaborative research environment and adept at communicating with scientists and nonscientists. To fill a student-identified learning gap in engaging in inclusive discussions, IGPPEB students developed a communication workshop to improve skills in visual engagement, citing specific content, constructive conversation entrances, and encouragement of peers. Based on short- and long-term assessment of the workshop, 100% of students reported that it should be offered to future cohorts and 63% of students perceived it to be personally helpful. Additionally, 92% of participants reported using one or more of the core skills beyond the course, with skills in “Encouraging peers” and “Constructive conversation entrances” rated the highest in perceived improvement. Based on the highest average rating of 76 ± 24 (on a scale of 0–100), students agreed that the workshop made them feel more welcome in the IGPPEB community. With a rating of 68 ± 13, they also agreed that the workshop had a positive impact on their graduate school experience. Participants provided suggestions for future improvements, such as increasing student involvement in leading discussions of course material. This study demonstrates that a student-led workshop can improve perceived discussion skills and build community across an interdisciplinary program in the sciences.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“学生主导的研讨会在跨学科研究生课程中加强了感知的讨论技巧和社区”
耶鲁大学物理与工程生物学综合研究生课程(IGPPEB)汇集了来自物理、工程和生物科学领域的博士生。该计划的主要目标是让学生在跨学科和合作研究环境中变得舒适,并善于与科学家和非科学家沟通。为了填补学生在参与包容性讨论方面的学习差距,IGPPEB学生开发了一个交流研讨会,以提高视觉参与的技能,引用特定的内容,建设性的对话入口,并鼓励同龄人。根据对研讨会的短期和长期评估,100%的学生报告说它应该提供给未来的同龄人,63%的学生认为它对个人有帮助。此外,92%的参与者报告说,在课程之外使用了一项或多项核心技能,其中“鼓励同伴”和“建设性对话入门”的技能在感知改善方面排名最高。根据最高平均评分(76±24分,满分为0-100分),学生们一致认为,研讨会让他们觉得自己在IGPPEB社区中更受欢迎。在68±13的评分中,他们也同意工作坊对他们的研究生院经历有积极的影响。与会者对未来的改进提出了建议,例如增加学生对课程材料的主导讨论的参与。本研究表明,学生主导的研讨会可以提高感知的讨论技巧,并在跨学科的科学项目中建立社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
FASEB bioAdvances
FASEB bioAdvances Multiple-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
56
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information In vivo optical assessment of cerebral and skeletal muscle microvascular response to phenylephrine Human inborn errors of long-chain fatty acid oxidation show impaired inflammatory responses to TLR4-ligand LPS Activation of nociception-sensitive ionotropic glutamate receptor-expressing rostroventrolateral medulla neurons by stimulation of cardiac afferents in rats Osteocalcin binds to a GPRC6A Venus fly trap allosteric site to positively modulate GPRC6A signaling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1