Clinical Research Updates

IF 6.8 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Child and Adolescent Mental Health Pub Date : 2023-01-15 DOI:10.1111/camh.12623
Marinos Kyriakopoulos, Evi Drosopoulou, Sofia Kleisari, Mara Ktena, Eleftheria Vanioti
{"title":"Clinical Research Updates","authors":"Marinos Kyriakopoulos,&nbsp;Evi Drosopoulou,&nbsp;Sofia Kleisari,&nbsp;Mara Ktena,&nbsp;Eleftheria Vanioti","doi":"10.1111/camh.12623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Evi Drosopoulou</p><p>National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece</p><p>Psychiatric disorders, and psychotic disorders in particular, are associated with NEET (“not in education, employment or training”), which means that the person is not studying, working, or participating in a job search program for some time in their life. Despite the severe effects of withdrawal from education and work experienced by many people diagnosed with psychotic disorders, the evaluation of risk factors affecting it, and potential rehabilitation targets remain understudied.</p><p>Ringbom et al. (2022) aimed to examine whether individuals diagnosed with psychotic disorders in adolescence had been out of work or education for more than 5 years (long-term NEET) compared with the general population. They also aimed to investigate risk markers for the development of long-term NEET and whether there is a correlation between socioeconomic and educational factors and inequalities in the use of rehabilitation services. They used data from the 1987 Finnish Birth Cohort study, which included 59,476 individuals born in Finland between January 1 and December 31, 1987, and from several Finish administrative registers. The study lasted until 2015 and therefore enabled the researchers to follow individuals up until the age of 28. In total, 55,171 individuals were eventually included in the analysis. Exclusion criteria were a diagnosis of intellectual disability, being diagnosed with a psychotic disorder between 1998–2003, not surviving until 31 December 2015, and having emigrated. The study found that 0.5% of the cohort (288 people) were diagnosed with a psychotic disorder (F20–F29) between the ages of 16 and 20 years. More than a third (35.8%) of them met criteria for long-term NEET, and in those diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, this figure was 57% as opposed to 2.2% in young people without psychosis. In relation to sociodemographic characteristics, it was observed that 58.3% of individuals with psychotic disorders had a parent receiving welfare benefits and that 78.6% of individuals had no upper secondary education diploma by the end of 2008. At the same time, in terms of comorbidity, the researchers found that more than half of people with psychosis had also been diagnosed with a depressive disorder. Younger age of psychosis onset within the 16–20 years bracket was not associated with long-term NEET. The study also found that the most common form of rehabilitation was specialized vocational rehabilitation (24.4% of cases) and much less so psychotherapy; this form of rehabilitation was given especially to people who were long-term NEET which may indicate that rehabilitation was given late when the person had already been away from school or work for years.</p><p>These findings suggest that long-term NEET is a significant concern for young people with psychotic disorders. Intensive rehabilitation as early as possible in the course of the illness may be associated with improved long-term outcomes. The study had several strengths, including sample size, study duration, and the fact that it linked many registers to a birth cohort. The authors highlighted a few limitations including the need for longitudinal studies in other countries with less homogeneous populations to further explore the association between psychosis and long-term NEET, including information on race and ethnicity.</p><p>Ringbom, I., Suvisaari, J., Kääriälä, A., Sourander, A., Gissler, M., Kelleher, I., &amp; Gyllenberg, D. (2022). Psychotic disorders in adolescence and later long-term exclusion from education and employment. <i>Schizophrenia Bulletin</i>, sbac151. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac151</p><p>Sofia Kleisari</p><p>National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece</p><p>Adverse childhood experiences, such as childhood maltreatment, undermine the normal development of emotional skills and have been linked to the development of alexithymia. Alexithymia is a phenomenon characterized by difficulties in recognizing, describing, distinguishing, and expressing one's own emotions and is associated with difficulties in one's ability to form healthy interpersonal relationships. Alexithymia may act as a mediator between childhood maltreatment and adult psychopathology and might also serve as a potential coping mechanism when exposed to adverse emotional expression as well as punishment for expressing specific types of emotions. Literature shows that certain types of childhood maltreatment, such as emotional and physical neglect, may be associated with alexithymia, while findings on physical and sexual abuse are not consistent.</p><p>Khan and Jafee (2022) in this systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the degree to which maltreatment in childhood and adolescence was associated with alexithymia, as measured in adulthood. A total of 88 studies with 43,076 individuals were included. Most of the studies (<i>N</i> = 68) used The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire to measure childhood maltreatment while the rest used standardized measures, self-reports, and clinical interviews. Self-report measures were used for alexithymia. The meta-analysis estimated the association of alexithymia with all types of childhood maltreatment combined as well as separately for each subtype (physical abuse, emotional abuse, sexual abuse, physical neglect, and emotional neglect). Meta-regressions were applied for examining the role of moderators, such as gender, race, sample type, age, continent, maltreatment measurement, and quality of the study. The authors identified a small, statistically significant effect size for the association between alexithymia and overall maltreatment (<i>r</i> = .22). All subtypes of maltreatment were significantly linked to alexithymia; stronger associations were found between alexithymia and emotional neglect (<i>r</i> = .24), physical neglect (<i>r</i> = .23), and emotional abuse (<i>r</i> = .21). Only gender seemed to act as a moderator, with the association between alexithymia and maltreatment being greater in females than males.</p><p>This meta-analysis demonstrated that childhood emotional and physical neglect are the subtypes of maltreatment most strongly associated with alexithymia. Limitations of the analyzed studies include the use of retrospective self-report measures which are subject to recall bias and have poor reliability, and suboptimal reporting of sample demographics which affects conclusions on the generalizability of findings. Further studies could investigate the effects of chronicity and cooccurrence of maltreatment subtypes in the development of alexithymia. Targeting alexithymia in treatment may promote emotional development and mental health.</p><p>Khan, A.N., &amp; Jaffee, S.R. (2022). Alexithymia in individuals maltreated as children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. <i>Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry</i>. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13616</p><p>Mara Ktena</p><p>National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece</p><p>Depression may present early in life, even during the preschool period. Preschool depressive disorders are frequently accompanied by other mental disorders, are related to functional impairment in multiple domains, and carry an increased risk for subsequent depressive episodes in middle childhood and adolescence. These early depressive episodes may also constitute predictive indicators of sequential comorbidity (i.e., subsequent anxiety, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and disruptive behavior disorders). However, the clinical and prognostic significance of early childhood depression requires further elucidation.</p><p>Silver et al. (2022) conducted a follow-up study to investigate first, whether 3- and 6-year-old depressed children were at a higher risk to exhibit episodes of depression and other psychiatric disorders in the future, and, second, whether they present with subsequent functional impairment. The participants (<i>N</i> = 516) were initially assessed for psychopathology during the age of 3 and 6 using the Preschool-Age Psychiatric Assessment (PAPA) and later at ages 9, 12, and 15 years using the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia. The former was administered solely to parents, whereas the latter was both to a parent and to the child. In addition, the Children's Global Assessment Scale was used for the measurement of global functioning at each age. The findings indicated that participants who met the criteria for depressive disorders at age 3/6 were at a greater risk of developing a subsequent episode of depressive disorder (32.6%) and were more likely to present later with anxiety disorders (30.6%), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (18.6%), and suicidality (15.7%) compared with children without depressive disorders at that age. Moreover, a strong link was found between mothers reporting depressive symptoms and early childhood depression. Finally, the study suggests that children who experienced depression at a very early age had lower levels of global and interpersonal functioning and higher rates of treatment at age 15 years in comparison with those who did not.</p><p>The present study highlights the clinical significance and the prognostic value of early childhood depression and has several advantages including multiple follow-up waves and parent-rated and children-based measures of psychopathology and functional impairment. It has also some limitations related to the generalizability of its findings since the sample was not randomly selected and predominantly consisted of white and middle-class families. Another limitation is related to the low prevalence of depressive disorders in this community sample and the heterogeneity of the depressed group that included participants with major depression, dysthymia, and depression NOS.</p><p>Silver, J., Olino, T.M., Carlson, G.A., Dougherty, L.R., Bufferd, S.J., &amp; Klein, D.N. (2022). Depression in 3/6-year-old children: clinical and psychosocial outcomes in later childhood and adolescence. <i>Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry</i>, 63, 984–991.</p><p>Eleftheria Vanioti</p><p>National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece</p><p>Adolescents need adequate sleep for optimal development and health. However, several lines of research have shown that the majority of adolescents do not have a consistent sleep schedule. Reduced sleep at that age has been associated with poorer general and mental health, academic underachievement, and increased risk-taking behaviors.</p><p>Maskevich et al. (2022) studied adolescents' daily sleep self-regulation by investigating the planning and execution of their plans as well as sleep opportunities. This study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to collect daily adolescents' bedtime and rise time plans. For 28 days, including school and vacation weeks, 205 adolescents (54.1% female, 64.4% non-White) from years 10 to 12 reported their sleep plans and wore an Actiwatch to measure actual daily sleep. The results showed that one in five adolescents never planned bedtime (school days 19.5%, nonschool days 53.2%). Furthermore, less than a third of those who planned it did so consistently only on school nights. On average, actual bedtime was delayed by about an hour (71 min delay on nonschool nights, 46 min on school nights), and only a third of adolescents went to bed as planned. More adolescents executed their sleep plans (within 15 min) consistently at school than on nonschool days and nights. In addition, with increasing age, consistent sleep planning decreased in females but increased or remained stable in males. As far as sleep opportunity is concerned, when bedtime was planned and executed by plans then time in bed was more. Therefore, planning and plan execution were protective factors of sleep opportunities. In addition, a large number of adolescents (~40%) reported parental influence on sleep planning, and most adolescents planned more time in bed than they perceived they needed. However, about half of adolescents considered that they needed less than 8 hr of sleep on both school and nonschool days.</p><p>These findings demonstrate that adolescents need support for sleep self-regulation. Planning and execution of plans about bedtime are protective factors for sleep opportunities on school nights. Likewise, adolescents' perception of sleep needed is an important therapeutic intervention target.</p><p>Maskevich, S., Shen, L., Drummond, S.P.A., Bei B. (2022). What time do you plan to sleep tonight? An intense longitudinal study of adolescent daily sleep self-regulation via planning and its associations with sleep opportunity. <i>Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry</i>. 63, 900–911.</p><p>No ethical approval was required for these updates.</p>","PeriodicalId":49291,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":"28 1","pages":"180-182"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/camh.12623","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/camh.12623","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evi Drosopoulou

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Psychiatric disorders, and psychotic disorders in particular, are associated with NEET (“not in education, employment or training”), which means that the person is not studying, working, or participating in a job search program for some time in their life. Despite the severe effects of withdrawal from education and work experienced by many people diagnosed with psychotic disorders, the evaluation of risk factors affecting it, and potential rehabilitation targets remain understudied.

Ringbom et al. (2022) aimed to examine whether individuals diagnosed with psychotic disorders in adolescence had been out of work or education for more than 5 years (long-term NEET) compared with the general population. They also aimed to investigate risk markers for the development of long-term NEET and whether there is a correlation between socioeconomic and educational factors and inequalities in the use of rehabilitation services. They used data from the 1987 Finnish Birth Cohort study, which included 59,476 individuals born in Finland between January 1 and December 31, 1987, and from several Finish administrative registers. The study lasted until 2015 and therefore enabled the researchers to follow individuals up until the age of 28. In total, 55,171 individuals were eventually included in the analysis. Exclusion criteria were a diagnosis of intellectual disability, being diagnosed with a psychotic disorder between 1998–2003, not surviving until 31 December 2015, and having emigrated. The study found that 0.5% of the cohort (288 people) were diagnosed with a psychotic disorder (F20–F29) between the ages of 16 and 20 years. More than a third (35.8%) of them met criteria for long-term NEET, and in those diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, this figure was 57% as opposed to 2.2% in young people without psychosis. In relation to sociodemographic characteristics, it was observed that 58.3% of individuals with psychotic disorders had a parent receiving welfare benefits and that 78.6% of individuals had no upper secondary education diploma by the end of 2008. At the same time, in terms of comorbidity, the researchers found that more than half of people with psychosis had also been diagnosed with a depressive disorder. Younger age of psychosis onset within the 16–20 years bracket was not associated with long-term NEET. The study also found that the most common form of rehabilitation was specialized vocational rehabilitation (24.4% of cases) and much less so psychotherapy; this form of rehabilitation was given especially to people who were long-term NEET which may indicate that rehabilitation was given late when the person had already been away from school or work for years.

These findings suggest that long-term NEET is a significant concern for young people with psychotic disorders. Intensive rehabilitation as early as possible in the course of the illness may be associated with improved long-term outcomes. The study had several strengths, including sample size, study duration, and the fact that it linked many registers to a birth cohort. The authors highlighted a few limitations including the need for longitudinal studies in other countries with less homogeneous populations to further explore the association between psychosis and long-term NEET, including information on race and ethnicity.

Ringbom, I., Suvisaari, J., Kääriälä, A., Sourander, A., Gissler, M., Kelleher, I., & Gyllenberg, D. (2022). Psychotic disorders in adolescence and later long-term exclusion from education and employment. Schizophrenia Bulletin, sbac151. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac151

Sofia Kleisari

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Adverse childhood experiences, such as childhood maltreatment, undermine the normal development of emotional skills and have been linked to the development of alexithymia. Alexithymia is a phenomenon characterized by difficulties in recognizing, describing, distinguishing, and expressing one's own emotions and is associated with difficulties in one's ability to form healthy interpersonal relationships. Alexithymia may act as a mediator between childhood maltreatment and adult psychopathology and might also serve as a potential coping mechanism when exposed to adverse emotional expression as well as punishment for expressing specific types of emotions. Literature shows that certain types of childhood maltreatment, such as emotional and physical neglect, may be associated with alexithymia, while findings on physical and sexual abuse are not consistent.

Khan and Jafee (2022) in this systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the degree to which maltreatment in childhood and adolescence was associated with alexithymia, as measured in adulthood. A total of 88 studies with 43,076 individuals were included. Most of the studies (N = 68) used The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire to measure childhood maltreatment while the rest used standardized measures, self-reports, and clinical interviews. Self-report measures were used for alexithymia. The meta-analysis estimated the association of alexithymia with all types of childhood maltreatment combined as well as separately for each subtype (physical abuse, emotional abuse, sexual abuse, physical neglect, and emotional neglect). Meta-regressions were applied for examining the role of moderators, such as gender, race, sample type, age, continent, maltreatment measurement, and quality of the study. The authors identified a small, statistically significant effect size for the association between alexithymia and overall maltreatment (r = .22). All subtypes of maltreatment were significantly linked to alexithymia; stronger associations were found between alexithymia and emotional neglect (r = .24), physical neglect (r = .23), and emotional abuse (r = .21). Only gender seemed to act as a moderator, with the association between alexithymia and maltreatment being greater in females than males.

This meta-analysis demonstrated that childhood emotional and physical neglect are the subtypes of maltreatment most strongly associated with alexithymia. Limitations of the analyzed studies include the use of retrospective self-report measures which are subject to recall bias and have poor reliability, and suboptimal reporting of sample demographics which affects conclusions on the generalizability of findings. Further studies could investigate the effects of chronicity and cooccurrence of maltreatment subtypes in the development of alexithymia. Targeting alexithymia in treatment may promote emotional development and mental health.

Khan, A.N., & Jaffee, S.R. (2022). Alexithymia in individuals maltreated as children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13616

Mara Ktena

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Depression may present early in life, even during the preschool period. Preschool depressive disorders are frequently accompanied by other mental disorders, are related to functional impairment in multiple domains, and carry an increased risk for subsequent depressive episodes in middle childhood and adolescence. These early depressive episodes may also constitute predictive indicators of sequential comorbidity (i.e., subsequent anxiety, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and disruptive behavior disorders). However, the clinical and prognostic significance of early childhood depression requires further elucidation.

Silver et al. (2022) conducted a follow-up study to investigate first, whether 3- and 6-year-old depressed children were at a higher risk to exhibit episodes of depression and other psychiatric disorders in the future, and, second, whether they present with subsequent functional impairment. The participants (N = 516) were initially assessed for psychopathology during the age of 3 and 6 using the Preschool-Age Psychiatric Assessment (PAPA) and later at ages 9, 12, and 15 years using the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia. The former was administered solely to parents, whereas the latter was both to a parent and to the child. In addition, the Children's Global Assessment Scale was used for the measurement of global functioning at each age. The findings indicated that participants who met the criteria for depressive disorders at age 3/6 were at a greater risk of developing a subsequent episode of depressive disorder (32.6%) and were more likely to present later with anxiety disorders (30.6%), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (18.6%), and suicidality (15.7%) compared with children without depressive disorders at that age. Moreover, a strong link was found between mothers reporting depressive symptoms and early childhood depression. Finally, the study suggests that children who experienced depression at a very early age had lower levels of global and interpersonal functioning and higher rates of treatment at age 15 years in comparison with those who did not.

The present study highlights the clinical significance and the prognostic value of early childhood depression and has several advantages including multiple follow-up waves and parent-rated and children-based measures of psychopathology and functional impairment. It has also some limitations related to the generalizability of its findings since the sample was not randomly selected and predominantly consisted of white and middle-class families. Another limitation is related to the low prevalence of depressive disorders in this community sample and the heterogeneity of the depressed group that included participants with major depression, dysthymia, and depression NOS.

Silver, J., Olino, T.M., Carlson, G.A., Dougherty, L.R., Bufferd, S.J., & Klein, D.N. (2022). Depression in 3/6-year-old children: clinical and psychosocial outcomes in later childhood and adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63, 984–991.

Eleftheria Vanioti

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Adolescents need adequate sleep for optimal development and health. However, several lines of research have shown that the majority of adolescents do not have a consistent sleep schedule. Reduced sleep at that age has been associated with poorer general and mental health, academic underachievement, and increased risk-taking behaviors.

Maskevich et al. (2022) studied adolescents' daily sleep self-regulation by investigating the planning and execution of their plans as well as sleep opportunities. This study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to collect daily adolescents' bedtime and rise time plans. For 28 days, including school and vacation weeks, 205 adolescents (54.1% female, 64.4% non-White) from years 10 to 12 reported their sleep plans and wore an Actiwatch to measure actual daily sleep. The results showed that one in five adolescents never planned bedtime (school days 19.5%, nonschool days 53.2%). Furthermore, less than a third of those who planned it did so consistently only on school nights. On average, actual bedtime was delayed by about an hour (71 min delay on nonschool nights, 46 min on school nights), and only a third of adolescents went to bed as planned. More adolescents executed their sleep plans (within 15 min) consistently at school than on nonschool days and nights. In addition, with increasing age, consistent sleep planning decreased in females but increased or remained stable in males. As far as sleep opportunity is concerned, when bedtime was planned and executed by plans then time in bed was more. Therefore, planning and plan execution were protective factors of sleep opportunities. In addition, a large number of adolescents (~40%) reported parental influence on sleep planning, and most adolescents planned more time in bed than they perceived they needed. However, about half of adolescents considered that they needed less than 8 hr of sleep on both school and nonschool days.

These findings demonstrate that adolescents need support for sleep self-regulation. Planning and execution of plans about bedtime are protective factors for sleep opportunities on school nights. Likewise, adolescents' perception of sleep needed is an important therapeutic intervention target.

Maskevich, S., Shen, L., Drummond, S.P.A., Bei B. (2022). What time do you plan to sleep tonight? An intense longitudinal study of adolescent daily sleep self-regulation via planning and its associations with sleep opportunity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 63, 900–911.

No ethical approval was required for these updates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床研究进展
希腊雅典国立大学(University of Athens)精神障碍,尤其是精神障碍,与NEET(未接受教育、就业或培训)有关,这意味着这个人在一生中有一段时间没有学习、工作或参加求职计划。尽管许多被诊断患有精神障碍的人经历了退出教育和工作的严重影响,但影响它的风险因素的评估和潜在的康复目标仍未得到充分研究。Ringbom等人(2022)旨在研究与一般人群相比,被诊断为青春期精神障碍的个体是否已经失业或未受教育超过5年(长期NEET)。他们还旨在调查长期NEET发展的风险标志,以及社会经济和教育因素与使用康复服务中的不平等之间是否存在相关性。他们使用了1987年芬兰出生队列研究的数据,其中包括1987年1月1日至12月31日在芬兰出生的59,476人,以及几个芬兰行政登记处的数据。这项研究一直持续到2015年,因此研究人员可以跟踪研究对象直到28岁。最终共有55171人被纳入分析。排除标准是被诊断为智力残疾,在1998-2003年期间被诊断为精神障碍,直到2015年12月31日才存活,并且已经移民。研究发现,在16岁至20岁的人群中,有0.5%(288人)被诊断患有精神障碍(F20-F29)。超过三分之一(35.8%)的人符合长期NEET的标准,在那些被诊断患有精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍的人中,这一数字为57%,而在没有精神疾病的年轻人中,这一数字为2.2%。在社会人口学特征方面,观察到58.3%的精神障碍患者的父母一方领取福利,78.6%的人到2008年底没有高中教育文凭。与此同时,在共病方面,研究人员发现,超过一半的精神病患者同时被诊断患有抑郁症。在16-20岁年龄组中,较年轻的精神病发病年龄与长期啃老族无关。研究还发现,最常见的康复形式是专门的职业康复(占24.4%),心理治疗要少得多;这种形式的康复治疗尤其适用于长期啃老族,这可能表明康复治疗是在患者离开学校或工作多年后才进行的。这些发现表明,长期啃老是患有精神障碍的年轻人的一个重要问题。在病程中尽早进行强化康复可能与改善长期预后有关。这项研究有几个优势,包括样本量、研究持续时间,以及它将许多登记册与出生队列联系起来。作者强调了一些局限性,包括需要在其他人口不太均匀的国家进行纵向研究,以进一步探索精神病与长期NEET之间的关系,包括种族和民族的信息。林邦,我,Suvisaari, J, Kääriälä, A,苏兰德,A,吉斯勒,M,凯莱赫,I, &;吉伦伯格,D.(2022)。青少年时期的精神障碍以及后来长期被排除在教育和就业之外。精神分裂症公报,sbac151。sofia kleisaran雅典大学,雅典,希腊不良的童年经历,如童年虐待,会破坏情感技能的正常发展,并与述情障碍的发展有关。述情障碍是一种现象,其特征是难以识别、描述、区分和表达自己的情绪,并与一个人形成健康人际关系的能力困难有关。述情障碍可能是儿童虐待与成人精神病理之间的中介,也可能是暴露于不良情绪表达和表达特定类型情绪的惩罚时的潜在应对机制。文献显示,某些类型的儿童虐待,如情感和身体上的忽视,可能与述情障碍有关,而关于身体和性虐待的研究结果并不一致。Khan和Jafee(2022)在这项系统回顾和荟萃分析中调查了童年和青春期虐待与述情障碍的关联程度,并在成年期进行了测量。共纳入88项研究,涉及43076人。 大多数研究(N = 68)使用儿童创伤问卷来测量儿童虐待,其余研究使用标准化测量、自我报告和临床访谈。述情障碍采用自我报告方法。荟萃分析估计述情障碍与所有类型的儿童虐待(身体虐待、情感虐待、性虐待、身体忽视和情感忽视)的关联。应用元回归来检验调节因子的作用,如性别、种族、样本类型、年龄、大洲、虐待测量和研究质量。作者发现述情障碍与整体虐待之间存在一个小的、统计学上显著的效应大小(r = 0.22)。所有亚型的虐待都与述情障碍显著相关;述情障碍与情感忽视(r = 0.24)、身体忽视(r = 0.23)和情感虐待(r = 0.21)之间存在更强的关联。只有性别似乎起着调节作用,述情障碍和虐待之间的关联在女性中比在男性中更大。这项荟萃分析表明,儿童时期的情感和身体忽视是与述情障碍最密切相关的虐待亚型。所分析的研究的局限性包括使用回顾性自我报告测量,这受到回忆偏差和可靠性差的影响,以及样本人口统计数据的次优报告,这影响了研究结果的可推广性结论。进一步的研究可以探讨慢性和同时发生的虐待亚型对述情障碍发展的影响。针对述情障碍的治疗可能促进情感发展和心理健康。a.n.可汗,&;Jaffee, S.R.(2022)。儿童和青少年受虐待个体述情障碍:一项荟萃分析。儿童心理学与精神病学杂志。https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13616Mara希腊雅典KtenaNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens抑郁可能出现在生命的早期,甚至在学龄前时期。学龄前抑郁症经常伴有其他精神障碍,与多个领域的功能障碍有关,并且在儿童中期和青春期随后出现抑郁发作的风险增加。这些早期抑郁发作也可能构成后续共病的预测指标(即随后的焦虑、注意缺陷多动障碍和破坏性行为障碍)。然而,早期儿童抑郁症的临床和预后意义需要进一步阐明。Silver等人(2022)进行了一项随访研究,首先调查3岁和6岁的抑郁症儿童未来是否有更高的抑郁发作和其他精神疾病的风险,其次调查他们是否会出现随后的功能障碍。参与者(N = 516)最初在3岁和6岁时使用学龄前精神病学评估(PAPA)进行精神病理学评估,随后在9岁、12岁和15岁时使用儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症时间表进行评估。前者只适用于父母,而后者同时适用于父母和孩子。此外,儿童全球评估量表用于测量每个年龄段的全球功能。研究结果表明,在3/6岁时符合抑郁症标准的参与者与该年龄没有抑郁症的儿童相比,患抑郁症后续发作的风险更大(32.6%),后来更有可能出现焦虑症(30.6%),注意缺陷多动障碍(18.6%)和自杀(15.7%)。此外,报告抑郁症状的母亲与儿童早期抑郁之间存在密切联系。最后,研究表明,与那些没有抑郁症的孩子相比,在很小的时候就经历过抑郁症的孩子在15岁时的全球和人际功能水平较低,治疗率较高。本研究强调了儿童早期抑郁症的临床意义和预后价值,并具有多重随访波、家长评定和儿童为基础的精神病理和功能障碍测量等优势。由于样本不是随机选择的,而且主要由白人和中产阶级家庭组成,因此研究结果的普遍性也存在一些局限性。另一个限制与该社区样本中抑郁障碍的低患病率和抑郁组的异质性有关,抑郁组包括重度抑郁症、心境恶劣和抑郁症的参与者。克莱因,D.N.(2022)。 3/6岁儿童的抑郁症:儿童期后期和青春期的临床和社会心理结果儿童心理与精神病学杂志,63,984-991。青少年需要充足的睡眠,以达到最佳的发育和健康。然而,几项研究表明,大多数青少年没有一致的睡眠时间表。在这个年龄睡眠减少与一般和心理健康状况较差、学习成绩不佳以及冒险行为增加有关。Maskevich et al.(2022)通过调查青少年的睡眠计划和执行情况以及睡眠机会来研究青少年的日常睡眠自我调节。本研究采用生态瞬时评估(EMA)收集青少年每日就寝时间和起床时间计划。在28天的时间里,包括学校和假期,205名10岁至12岁的青少年(54.1%为女性,64.4%为非白人)报告了他们的睡眠计划,并佩戴了Actiwatch来测量每天的实际睡眠时间。结果显示,五分之一的青少年从未计划过就寝时间(上学日19.5%,非上学日53.2%)。此外,只有不到三分之一的人只在上学的晚上这么做。平均而言,实际就寝时间延迟了大约一个小时(非学校晚上延迟71分钟,学校晚上延迟46分钟),只有三分之一的青少年按计划上床睡觉。更多的青少年在学校坚持执行他们的睡眠计划(在15分钟内),而不是在非学校的白天和晚上。此外,随着年龄的增长,女性持续的睡眠计划减少,而男性增加或保持稳定。就睡眠机会而言,当就寝时间被计划好并按计划执行时,在床上的时间就会更多。因此,计划和计划执行是睡眠机会的保护因素。此外,大量青少年(约40%)报告了父母对睡眠计划的影响,大多数青少年计划在床上的时间超过了他们认为需要的时间。然而,大约一半的青少年认为他们在上学和不上学的日子里都需要少于8小时的睡眠。这些发现表明青少年在睡眠自我调节方面需要支持。睡前计划的规划和执行是学校晚上睡眠机会的保护因素。同样,青少年对睡眠需求的感知也是一个重要的治疗干预目标。Maskevich, S., Shen, L., Drummond, S.P.A, Bei B.(2022)。你今晚打算几点睡觉?通过计划对青少年日常睡眠自我调节及其与睡眠机会的关联进行了深入的纵向研究。儿童心理与精神病学杂志。63,900 - 911。这些更新不需要伦理批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Child and Adolescent Mental Health PEDIATRICS-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
77
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Child and Adolescent Mental Health (CAMH) publishes high quality, peer-reviewed child and adolescent mental health services research of relevance to academics, clinicians and commissioners internationally. The journal''s principal aim is to foster evidence-based clinical practice and clinically orientated research among clinicians and health services researchers working with children and adolescents, parents and their families in relation to or with a particular interest in mental health. CAMH publishes reviews, original articles, and pilot reports of innovative approaches, interventions, clinical methods and service developments. The journal has regular sections on Measurement Issues, Innovations in Practice, Global Child Mental Health and Humanities. All published papers should be of direct relevance to mental health practitioners and clearly draw out clinical implications for the field.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Editorial: Advancing equity, diversity and inclusion through culturally sensitive collaboration and training Clinical research updates Debate: Bridging the gap – role of nonspecialists in child and adolescent mental health care Debate: How much should nonspecialists be involved in mental health care for children and young people when resources are limited? Working with police forces to improve mental health crisis care for young people
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1