Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Search for New Information Through Routine Laboratory Tests: Systematic Review.

Glauco Cardozo, Salvador Francisco Tirloni, Antônio Renato Pereira Moro, Jefferson Luiz Brum Marques
{"title":"Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Search for New Information Through Routine Laboratory Tests: Systematic Review.","authors":"Glauco Cardozo,&nbsp;Salvador Francisco Tirloni,&nbsp;Antônio Renato Pereira Moro,&nbsp;Jefferson Luiz Brum Marques","doi":"10.2196/40473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent decades, the use of artificial intelligence has been widely explored in health care. Similarly, the amount of data generated in the most varied medical processes has practically doubled every year, requiring new methods of analysis and treatment of these data. Mainly aimed at aiding in the diagnosis and prevention of diseases, this precision medicine has shown great potential in different medical disciplines. Laboratory tests, for example, almost always present their results separately as individual values. However, physicians need to analyze a set of results to propose a supposed diagnosis, which leads us to think that sets of laboratory tests may contain more information than those presented separately for each result. In this way, the processes of medical laboratories can be strongly affected by these techniques.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this sense, we sought to identify scientific research that used laboratory tests and machine learning techniques to predict hidden information and diagnose diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The methodology adopted used the population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes principle, searching the main engineering and health sciences databases. The search terms were defined based on the list of terms used in the Medical Subject Heading database. Data from this study were presented descriptively and followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; 2020) statement flow diagram and the National Institutes of Health tool for quality assessment of articles. During the analysis, the inclusion and exclusion criteria were independently applied by 2 authors, with a third author being consulted in cases of disagreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the defined requirements, 40 studies presenting good quality in the analysis process were selected and evaluated. We found that, in recent years, there has been a significant increase in the number of works that have used this methodology, mainly because of COVID-19. In general, the studies used machine learning classification models to predict new information, and the most used parameters were data from routine laboratory tests such as the complete blood count.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Finally, we conclude that laboratory tests, together with machine learning techniques, can predict new tests, thus helping the search for new diagnoses. This process has proved to be advantageous and innovative for medical laboratories. It is making it possible to discover hidden information and propose additional tests, reducing the number of false negatives and helping in the early discovery of unknown diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":73552,"journal":{"name":"JMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9828303/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/40473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: In recent decades, the use of artificial intelligence has been widely explored in health care. Similarly, the amount of data generated in the most varied medical processes has practically doubled every year, requiring new methods of analysis and treatment of these data. Mainly aimed at aiding in the diagnosis and prevention of diseases, this precision medicine has shown great potential in different medical disciplines. Laboratory tests, for example, almost always present their results separately as individual values. However, physicians need to analyze a set of results to propose a supposed diagnosis, which leads us to think that sets of laboratory tests may contain more information than those presented separately for each result. In this way, the processes of medical laboratories can be strongly affected by these techniques.

Objective: In this sense, we sought to identify scientific research that used laboratory tests and machine learning techniques to predict hidden information and diagnose diseases.

Methods: The methodology adopted used the population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes principle, searching the main engineering and health sciences databases. The search terms were defined based on the list of terms used in the Medical Subject Heading database. Data from this study were presented descriptively and followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; 2020) statement flow diagram and the National Institutes of Health tool for quality assessment of articles. During the analysis, the inclusion and exclusion criteria were independently applied by 2 authors, with a third author being consulted in cases of disagreement.

Results: Following the defined requirements, 40 studies presenting good quality in the analysis process were selected and evaluated. We found that, in recent years, there has been a significant increase in the number of works that have used this methodology, mainly because of COVID-19. In general, the studies used machine learning classification models to predict new information, and the most used parameters were data from routine laboratory tests such as the complete blood count.

Conclusions: Finally, we conclude that laboratory tests, together with machine learning techniques, can predict new tests, thus helping the search for new diagnoses. This process has proved to be advantageous and innovative for medical laboratories. It is making it possible to discover hidden information and propose additional tests, reducing the number of false negatives and helping in the early discovery of unknown diseases.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能在通过常规实验室测试搜索新信息中的应用:系统综述。
背景:近几十年来,人工智能在医疗保健领域的应用得到了广泛的探索。同样,在最不同的医疗过程中产生的数据量几乎每年翻一番,需要新的分析和处理这些数据的方法。这种以帮助诊断和预防疾病为主要目的的精准医学在不同的医学学科中显示出巨大的潜力。例如,实验室测试几乎总是将其结果作为单独的值单独呈现。然而,医生需要分析一组结果来提出假定的诊断,这使我们认为,一组实验室测试可能包含比每个结果单独提供的信息更多的信息。这样,医学实验室的流程就会受到这些技术的强烈影响。目的:从这个意义上说,我们试图确定使用实验室测试和机器学习技术来预测隐藏信息和诊断疾病的科学研究。方法:采用人口、干预、比较和结果原则,检索主要的工程和健康科学数据库。搜索术语是根据医学主题标题数据库中使用的术语列表定义的。本研究的数据以描述性方式呈现,并遵循PRISMA(用于系统评价和meta分析的首选报告项目;2020)声明流程图和美国国立卫生研究院文章质量评估工具。在分析过程中,纳入和排除标准由2位作者独立应用,如有不同意见,请咨询第三位作者。结果:根据定义的要求,在分析过程中选择并评估了40项质量较好的研究。我们发现,近年来,主要由于COVID-19,使用这种方法的作品数量显著增加。总的来说,这些研究使用机器学习分类模型来预测新的信息,最常用的参数是来自常规实验室测试的数据,如全血细胞计数。结论:最后,我们得出结论,实验室测试与机器学习技术一起可以预测新的测试,从而有助于寻找新的诊断。这一过程已被证明是有利的和创新的医学实验室。它使人们能够发现隐藏的信息并提出额外的检测方法,减少假阴性的数量,并有助于及早发现未知疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ethical Considerations in Human-Centered AI: Advancing Oncology Chatbots Through Large Language Models. Enhancing Suicide Risk Prediction With Polygenic Scores in Psychiatric Emergency Settings: Prospective Study. Internet-Based Abnormal Chromosomal Diagnosis During Pregnancy Using a Noninvasive Innovative Approach to Detecting Chromosomal Abnormalities in the Fetus: Scoping Review. Comparison of the Neutralization Power of Sotrovimab Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants: Development of a Rapid Computational Method. Correction: Mutations of SARS-CoV-2 Structural Proteins in the Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta Variants: Bioinformatics Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1