Quantification of High-dimensional Non-Gaussianities and Its Implication to Fisher Analysis in Cosmology.

IF 4.8 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Astrophysical Journal Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.3847/1538-4357/acbe3b
Core Francisco Park, Erwan Allys, Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro, Douglas Finkbeiner
{"title":"Quantification of High-dimensional Non-Gaussianities and Its Implication to Fisher Analysis in Cosmology.","authors":"Core Francisco Park,&nbsp;Erwan Allys,&nbsp;Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro,&nbsp;Douglas Finkbeiner","doi":"10.3847/1538-4357/acbe3b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is well known that the power spectrum is not able to fully characterize the statistical properties of non-Gaussian density fields. Recently, many different statistics have been proposed to extract information from non-Gaussian cosmological fields that perform better than the power spectrum. The Fisher matrix formalism is commonly used to quantify the accuracy with which a given statistic can constrain the value of the cosmological parameters. However, these calculations typically rely on the assumption that the sampling distribution of the considered statistic follows a multivariate Gaussian distribution. In this work, we follow Sellentin & Heavens and use two different statistical tests to identify non-Gaussianities in different statistics such as the power spectrum, bispectrum, marked power spectrum, and wavelet scattering transform (WST). We remove the non-Gaussian components of the different statistics and perform Fisher matrix calculations with the <i>Gaussianized</i> statistics using Quijote simulations. We show that constraints on the parameters can change by a factor of ∼2 in some cases. We show with simple examples how statistics that do not follow a multivariate Gaussian distribution can achieve artificially tight bounds on the cosmological parameters when using the Fisher matrix formalism. We think that the non-Gaussian tests used in this work represent a powerful tool to quantify the robustness of Fisher matrix calculations and their underlying assumptions. We release the code used to compute the power spectra, bispectra, and WST that can be run on both CPUs and GPUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50735,"journal":{"name":"Astrophysical Journal","volume":"946 2","pages":"107"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10482003/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astrophysical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acbe3b","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

It is well known that the power spectrum is not able to fully characterize the statistical properties of non-Gaussian density fields. Recently, many different statistics have been proposed to extract information from non-Gaussian cosmological fields that perform better than the power spectrum. The Fisher matrix formalism is commonly used to quantify the accuracy with which a given statistic can constrain the value of the cosmological parameters. However, these calculations typically rely on the assumption that the sampling distribution of the considered statistic follows a multivariate Gaussian distribution. In this work, we follow Sellentin & Heavens and use two different statistical tests to identify non-Gaussianities in different statistics such as the power spectrum, bispectrum, marked power spectrum, and wavelet scattering transform (WST). We remove the non-Gaussian components of the different statistics and perform Fisher matrix calculations with the Gaussianized statistics using Quijote simulations. We show that constraints on the parameters can change by a factor of ∼2 in some cases. We show with simple examples how statistics that do not follow a multivariate Gaussian distribution can achieve artificially tight bounds on the cosmological parameters when using the Fisher matrix formalism. We think that the non-Gaussian tests used in this work represent a powerful tool to quantify the robustness of Fisher matrix calculations and their underlying assumptions. We release the code used to compute the power spectra, bispectra, and WST that can be run on both CPUs and GPUs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高维非高斯量的量化及其对宇宙学费雪分析的启示。
众所周知,功率谱不能完全表征非高斯密度场的统计性质。最近,人们提出了许多不同的统计方法来从非高斯宇宙学场中提取信息,这些统计方法的性能优于功率谱。费雪矩阵形式通常用于量化给定统计量约束宇宙学参数值的准确性。然而,这些计算通常依赖于所考虑的统计量的抽样分布遵循多元高斯分布的假设。在这项工作中,我们遵循Sellentin和Heavens,并使用两种不同的统计检验来识别功率谱、双谱、标记功率谱和小波散射变换(WST)等不同统计中的非高斯性。我们去除不同统计数据的非高斯分量,并使用Quijote模拟对高斯化统计数据进行Fisher矩阵计算。我们表明,在某些情况下,参数的约束可以改变约2倍。我们用简单的例子来说明,当使用Fisher矩阵形式时,不遵循多元高斯分布的统计数据如何在宇宙学参数上实现人为的严格界限。我们认为,在这项工作中使用的非高斯检验是一种强大的工具,可以量化费雪矩阵计算及其潜在假设的稳健性。我们发布了用于计算功率谱、双谱和WST的代码,这些代码可以在cpu和gpu上运行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Astrophysical Journal
Astrophysical Journal 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
30.60%
发文量
2854
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Astrophysical Journal is the foremost research journal in the world devoted to recent developments, discoveries, and theories in astronomy and astrophysics.
期刊最新文献
Deflection of Coronal Mass Ejections in Unipolar Ambient Magnetic Fields Hunting Gamma-Ray-emitting FR0 Radio Galaxies in Wide-field Sky Surveys GTC Follow-up Observations of Very Metal-poor Star Candidates from DESI Mapping Dust Attenuation and the 2175 Å Bump at Kiloparsec Scales in Nearby Galaxies Identification of 1RXS J165424.6-433758 as a Polar Cataclysmic Variable
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1