Different Dosage Regimens of Tanezumab for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neuropharmacology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1097/WNF.0000000000000530
Jinrong Lian, Jiahe Wang, Xiang Li, Siyuan Yang, Hang Li, Yi Zhong, Heng Gao, Gang Chen
{"title":"Different Dosage Regimens of Tanezumab for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Jinrong Lian,&nbsp;Jiahe Wang,&nbsp;Xiang Li,&nbsp;Siyuan Yang,&nbsp;Hang Li,&nbsp;Yi Zhong,&nbsp;Heng Gao,&nbsp;Gang Chen","doi":"10.1097/WNF.0000000000000530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of different dosage regimens of tanezumab among individuals living with chronic low back pain (CLBP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other databases were searched from inception until August 2021. Randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy and safety of tanezumab in individuals with CLBP were included. Data were extracted independently by 2 investigators and assessed the study quality by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The measurements include low back pain intensity and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. The incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events was set to assess the safety of tanezumab for CLBP.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>Three high-quality randomized controlled trials with 3414 patients were finally included in our analysis. Tanezumab, respectively, led to a notable decrease compared with placebo in low back pain intensity (mean difference, -0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.77 to -0.46; P < 0.01) and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (mean difference, -0.64; 95% CI, -0.80 to -0.47; P = 0.01). In addition, no significant difference existed between tanezumab and placebo groups (risk ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.81-1.49; P = 0.55) in the adverse events and (risk ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.34-3.27; P = 0.93) serious adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intravenous and subcutaneous tanezumab injections as treatment for improving CLBP have promising clinical application as its great improvement on all efficacy and its controllable safety issues. Furthermore, intravenous and subcutaneous tanezumab injections were proved to achieve excellent and long-term curative effect on CLBP through our subgroup analysis and comparison.</p>","PeriodicalId":10449,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropharmacology","volume":"46 1","pages":"6-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNF.0000000000000530","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of different dosage regimens of tanezumab among individuals living with chronic low back pain (CLBP).

Methods: PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other databases were searched from inception until August 2021. Randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy and safety of tanezumab in individuals with CLBP were included. Data were extracted independently by 2 investigators and assessed the study quality by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The measurements include low back pain intensity and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. The incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events was set to assess the safety of tanezumab for CLBP.

Results and discussion: Three high-quality randomized controlled trials with 3414 patients were finally included in our analysis. Tanezumab, respectively, led to a notable decrease compared with placebo in low back pain intensity (mean difference, -0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.77 to -0.46; P < 0.01) and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (mean difference, -0.64; 95% CI, -0.80 to -0.47; P = 0.01). In addition, no significant difference existed between tanezumab and placebo groups (risk ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.81-1.49; P = 0.55) in the adverse events and (risk ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.34-3.27; P = 0.93) serious adverse events.

Conclusions: Intravenous and subcutaneous tanezumab injections as treatment for improving CLBP have promising clinical application as its great improvement on all efficacy and its controllable safety issues. Furthermore, intravenous and subcutaneous tanezumab injections were proved to achieve excellent and long-term curative effect on CLBP through our subgroup analysis and comparison.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
坦珠单抗治疗慢性腰痛的不同剂量方案:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
目的:本研究的目的是评估不同剂量方案的tanezumab对慢性腰痛(CLBP)患者的疗效。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library等数据库,检索时间从建库到2021年8月。随机对照试验调查了tanezumab对CLBP患者的疗效和安全性。数据由2名研究者独立提取,并通过Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。测量方法包括腰痛强度和Roland-Morris残疾问卷。不良事件和严重不良事件的发生率被设定为评估tanezumab治疗CLBP的安全性。结果与讨论:我们最终纳入了3项高质量的随机对照试验,共3414例患者。与安慰剂相比,Tanezumab分别导致腰痛强度显著降低(平均差值为-0.62;95%置信区间[CI], -0.77 ~ -0.46;P < 0.01)和Roland-Morris残疾问卷(平均差异为-0.64;95% CI, -0.80 ~ -0.47;P = 0.01)。此外,坦珠单抗组与安慰剂组之间无显著差异(风险比,1.10;95% ci, 0.81-1.49;P = 0.55)和(风险比1.06;95% ci, 0.34-3.27;P = 0.93)严重不良事件。结论:静脉注射和皮下注射tanezumab改善CLBP,在所有疗效和可控制的安全性问题上均有较大改善,具有良好的临床应用前景。此外,通过我们的亚组分析和比较,证明静脉注射和皮下注射tanezumab对CLBP有良好的长期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropharmacology
Clinical Neuropharmacology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuropharmacology is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the pharmacology of the nervous system in its broadest sense. Coverage ranges from such basic aspects as mechanisms of action, structure-activity relationships, and drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, to practical clinical problems such as drug interactions, drug toxicity, and therapy for specific syndromes and symptoms. The journal publishes original articles and brief reports, invited and submitted reviews, and letters to the editor. A regular feature is the Patient Management Series: in-depth case presentations with clinical questions and answers.
期刊最新文献
Translational Neuroscience Contributes to Understanding Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Dostoyevsky's "Brothers Karamazov" With Treatment Implications. Pharmacological Management of Acute and Chronic Insomnia: A Cross-Sectional Study. A Retrospective Study on Botulinum Toxin Injection in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis Related Tremor: A Treatment Option Worth Trying. Molecular Docking Analysis Reveals the Promising Role of Apigenin as a Potential Treatment for Neurological Disorders. A Real-World Experience of Rituximab: A Panacea in Therapy of Multiple Sclerosis in Low- and Middle-Income Setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1