Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery in Large Ovarian Masses.

IF 1.4 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.4103/gmit.gmit_122_21
Tugba Kinay, Yasemin Kizilkaya, Sadiman Kiykac Altinbas, Omer Lutfi Tapisiz, Yaprak Engin Ustun
{"title":"Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery in Large Ovarian Masses.","authors":"Tugba Kinay,&nbsp;Yasemin Kizilkaya,&nbsp;Sadiman Kiykac Altinbas,&nbsp;Omer Lutfi Tapisiz,&nbsp;Yaprak Engin Ustun","doi":"10.4103/gmit.gmit_122_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic surgery for large ovarian masses with benign features.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Women who underwent laparoscopic surgery for an ovarian mass with benign features between 2017 and 2019 at a tertiary referral center were included in the retrospective study. Based on the size of the ovarian mass, the women were divided into the case and control groups of ≥10 cm and <10 cm, respectively. Clinical characteristics, operative findings, histopathological results, and complication rates of the groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 260 women, 64 women with large masses and 196 with small masses were included in the study. The operation time, intraoperative cyst rupture rate, complication rate, and hospital stay were similar in the case and control groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The cyst aspiration rate (29.7% vs. 5.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and the unexpected malignancy rate (7.8% vs. 0.0% <i>P</i> = 0.001) were significantly higher in the case group than in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic surgery was found feasible for the treatment of women with large ovarian masses. However, a higher unexpected malignancy rate requires the careful patient selection and appropriate counseling preoperatively in these cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":45272,"journal":{"name":"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT","volume":"11 4","pages":"215-220"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3f/a1/GMIT-11-215.PMC9844044.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/gmit.gmit_122_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic surgery for large ovarian masses with benign features.

Materials and methods: Women who underwent laparoscopic surgery for an ovarian mass with benign features between 2017 and 2019 at a tertiary referral center were included in the retrospective study. Based on the size of the ovarian mass, the women were divided into the case and control groups of ≥10 cm and <10 cm, respectively. Clinical characteristics, operative findings, histopathological results, and complication rates of the groups were compared.

Results: A total of 260 women, 64 women with large masses and 196 with small masses were included in the study. The operation time, intraoperative cyst rupture rate, complication rate, and hospital stay were similar in the case and control groups (P > 0.05). The cyst aspiration rate (29.7% vs. 5.1%, P < 0.001) and the unexpected malignancy rate (7.8% vs. 0.0% P = 0.001) were significantly higher in the case group than in the control group.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery was found feasible for the treatment of women with large ovarian masses. However, a higher unexpected malignancy rate requires the careful patient selection and appropriate counseling preoperatively in these cases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜手术治疗卵巢大肿块的可行性及安全性。
目的:探讨腹腔镜手术治疗卵巢良性肿物的可行性和安全性。材料和方法:回顾性研究纳入了2017年至2019年在三级转诊中心接受卵巢良性肿块腹腔镜手术的女性。根据卵巢肿块大小分为≥10 cm的病例组和对照组。结果:共纳入260例,其中大肿块64例,小肿块196例。两组手术时间、术中囊肿破裂率、并发症发生率、住院时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。病例组的囊肿抽吸率(29.7% vs. 5.1%, P < 0.001)和意外恶性肿瘤发生率(7.8% vs. 0.0% P = 0.001)显著高于对照组。结论:腹腔镜手术治疗卵巢肿大是可行的。然而,在这些病例中,较高的意外恶性肿瘤发生率需要仔细的患者选择和术前适当的咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
98
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Novel Technique of Laparoscopic Transabdominal Cerclage after a Mersilene Tape Erosion in a Prior Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy and Transvaginal Cerclage Patient. Comment on "Evaluation of the success of hysteroscopic uterine septum resection". Hysteroscopic Uterine Septum Resection: Is it a Successful Treatment for Infertile Patients? Laparoscopic Excision of Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: An Optimum Management Option. Laparoscopic Posterior Pelvic Exenteration with Radical Vulvectomy for Intestinal-type Vulvar Adenocarcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1