Linkage of Young Mania Rating Scale to Clinical Global Impression Scale to Enhance Utility in Clinical Practice and Research Trials.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacopsychiatry Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-1841-6672
Myrto T Samara, Stephen Z Levine, Stefan Leucht
{"title":"Linkage of Young Mania Rating Scale to Clinical Global Impression Scale to Enhance Utility in Clinical Practice and Research Trials.","authors":"Myrto T Samara,&nbsp;Stephen Z Levine,&nbsp;Stefan Leucht","doi":"10.1055/a-1841-6672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) is the gold standard to assess manic symptoms of bipolar disorder, yet the clinical meaning of scores is unknown. To clinically understand and interpret YMRS scores, we examined linkages between the total and change scores of YMRS with the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) ratings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individual participant data (N=2,988) from eight randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were included. Data were collected at baseline and subsequent visits. Spearman's correlation coefficients ρ were computed, and equipercentile linking was implemented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A YMRS score of 6 points corresponded approximately to 'borderline mentally ill,' 12 points to 'mildly ill,' 20 points to 'moderately ill,' 30 points to 'markedly ill,' 40 points to 'severely ill,' and 52 points to 'among the most extremely ill' patients on the CGI-S. A reduction of CGI-S by one point as well as 'minimally improved' on the CGI-I corresponded approximately to an absolute decrease of 4 to 8 YMRS points or a 21% to 29% reduction of YMRS baseline score whereas a reduction of CGI-S by two points and 'much improved' on the CGI-I corresponded to an absolute decrease of 10 to 15 points or a 42% to 53% reduction of YMRS baseline score.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The current study findings offer clinicians meaningful cutoff values to interpret YMRS scores. Moreover, these values contribute to the definition of treatment targets, response, remission, and entry criteria in mania trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":19783,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacopsychiatry","volume":"56 1","pages":"18-24"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacopsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1841-6672","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: The Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) is the gold standard to assess manic symptoms of bipolar disorder, yet the clinical meaning of scores is unknown. To clinically understand and interpret YMRS scores, we examined linkages between the total and change scores of YMRS with the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) ratings.

Methods: Individual participant data (N=2,988) from eight randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were included. Data were collected at baseline and subsequent visits. Spearman's correlation coefficients ρ were computed, and equipercentile linking was implemented.

Results: A YMRS score of 6 points corresponded approximately to 'borderline mentally ill,' 12 points to 'mildly ill,' 20 points to 'moderately ill,' 30 points to 'markedly ill,' 40 points to 'severely ill,' and 52 points to 'among the most extremely ill' patients on the CGI-S. A reduction of CGI-S by one point as well as 'minimally improved' on the CGI-I corresponded approximately to an absolute decrease of 4 to 8 YMRS points or a 21% to 29% reduction of YMRS baseline score whereas a reduction of CGI-S by two points and 'much improved' on the CGI-I corresponded to an absolute decrease of 10 to 15 points or a 42% to 53% reduction of YMRS baseline score.

Discussion: The current study findings offer clinicians meaningful cutoff values to interpret YMRS scores. Moreover, these values contribute to the definition of treatment targets, response, remission, and entry criteria in mania trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青年躁狂症评定量表与临床总体印象量表的联动以提高临床实践和研究试验的效用。
简介:青年躁狂症评定量表(YMRS)是评估双相情感障碍躁狂症状的金标准,但其临床意义尚不清楚。为了临床理解和解释YMRS评分,我们研究了YMRS总评分和变化评分与临床总体印象(CGI)评分之间的联系。方法:纳入8项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的个体参与者资料(N= 2988)。在基线和随后的访问中收集数据。计算Spearman相关系数ρ,并实现等百分位连接。结果:在gis - s上,YMRS得分为6分大致相当于“边缘性精神疾病”,12分相当于“轻度疾病”,20分相当于“中度疾病”,30分相当于“明显疾病”,40分相当于“严重疾病”,52分相当于“最严重疾病”。CGI-S减少1分并在CGI-I上“最低限度改善”大约对应于4至8个YMRS分的绝对下降或YMRS基线评分的21%至29%的降低,而CGI-S减少2分并在CGI-I上“大大改善”对应于10至15分的绝对下降或YMRS基线评分的42%至53%的降低。讨论:目前的研究结果为临床医生解释YMRS评分提供了有意义的截止值。此外,这些值有助于定义治疗目标、反应、缓解和躁狂试验的进入标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacopsychiatry
Pharmacopsychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering advances in the fi eld of psychotropic drugs, Pharmaco psychiatry provides psychiatrists, neuroscientists and clinicians with key clinical insights and describes new avenues of research and treatment. The pharmacological and neurobiological bases of psychiatric disorders are discussed by presenting clinical and experimental research.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Parkinson Medication on Neuropsychiatric and Neurocognitive Symptoms in Patients with Advanced Parkinson Disease Prior to Deep Brain Stimulation. Impact of Antipsychotic Medications on Weight Gain and Eating Disorder-Related Psychopathology in Adult Inpatients with Anorexia Nervosa. Activation of Hippocampal Neuronal NADPH Oxidase NOX2 Promotes Depressive-Like Behaviour and Cognition Deficits in Chronic Restraint Stress Mouse Model. Early Treatment-Resistance in First Episode Psychosis. ABC Family Gene Polymorphisms and Cognitive Functions Interact to Influence Antidepressant Efficacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1