Mapping Impossible Utilities: The ICER Report on Tezepelumab for Severe Asthma.

Paul C Langley
{"title":"Mapping Impossible Utilities: The ICER Report on Tezepelumab for Severe Asthma.","authors":"Paul C Langley","doi":"10.24926/iip.v13i2.4455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The focus of this commentary is on the attempt to create EQ-5D-3L ordinal preferences from a disease specific asthma questionnaire, the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ). The question is whether it is possible from the perspective of fundamental measurement to create a simple linear algorithm to map AQLQ scores to EQ-5D-3L preferences. It is proposed that this is mathematically impossible as the aggregate AQLQ score is ordinal, apart from the fact that the AQLQ is a multiattribute score that lacks construct validity and any pretense to having interval properties. Disallowing the mapped utilities means that the modelling cannot be sustained. It is proposed that the focus should be on single attribute measures of the latent construct \"need fulfillment quality of life\". These measures would meet the required standards of Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT) applying simultaneous conjoint standards of measurement theory, as well as capturing the patient voice.</p>","PeriodicalId":13646,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in Pharmacy","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/8e/21550417-13-02-4455.PMC9836758.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v13i2.4455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The focus of this commentary is on the attempt to create EQ-5D-3L ordinal preferences from a disease specific asthma questionnaire, the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ). The question is whether it is possible from the perspective of fundamental measurement to create a simple linear algorithm to map AQLQ scores to EQ-5D-3L preferences. It is proposed that this is mathematically impossible as the aggregate AQLQ score is ordinal, apart from the fact that the AQLQ is a multiattribute score that lacks construct validity and any pretense to having interval properties. Disallowing the mapped utilities means that the modelling cannot be sustained. It is proposed that the focus should be on single attribute measures of the latent construct "need fulfillment quality of life". These measures would meet the required standards of Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT) applying simultaneous conjoint standards of measurement theory, as well as capturing the patient voice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制不可能的效用:ICER关于Tezepelumab治疗严重哮喘的报告。
本评论的重点是尝试从特定疾病的哮喘问卷,哮喘生活质量问卷(AQLQ)中创建EQ-5D-3L顺序偏好。问题是,是否有可能从基础测量的角度创建一个简单的线性算法,将AQLQ分数映射到EQ-5D-3L偏好。提出这在数学上是不可能的,因为总体AQLQ分数是有序的,而且AQLQ是一个多属性分数,缺乏构造有效性和任何具有区间属性的伪装。不允许映射的实用程序意味着不能维持建模。建议重点研究“需要满足生活质量”潜在构式的单一属性测量。这些措施将满足Rasch测量理论(RMT)的要求标准,同时应用测量理论的联合标准,并捕获患者的声音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Pharmacy Entrustable Professional Activities Strategies Proposed by Students and Pharmacists for Virtual Experiential Patient Care Practicums In-class Exercises Regarding the Roles of Excipients in a Pharmaceutics Course The Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship in Treating Patients with Escherichia coli Bacteremia in a Small Single Center Community Hospital Development and Pilot Testing of the OTC Coach Software to Support Student Pharmacist Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1