Chloroquine Supplementation for the Treatment of Glioblastoma: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neuropharmacology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1097/WNF.0000000000000533
Qiang Deng, Sihong Tao, Hui Huang, Qikun Lv, Wei Wang
{"title":"Chloroquine Supplementation for the Treatment of Glioblastoma: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.","authors":"Qiang Deng,&nbsp;Sihong Tao,&nbsp;Hui Huang,&nbsp;Qikun Lv,&nbsp;Wei Wang","doi":"10.1097/WNF.0000000000000533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chloroquine supplementation may show some potential in improving the efficacy for glioblastoma, and this meta-analysis aimed to identify the efficacy of chloroquine supplementation for patients with glioblastoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Several databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library databases have been systematically searched through August 2022, and we included randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of chloroquine supplementation for glioblastoma. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model or fixed-effect model based on the heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four randomized controlled trials were finally included in this meta-analysis. In comparison with control group for glioblastoma, chloroquine supplementation was associated with substantially decreased mortality (odd ratio [OR], 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.53; P = 0.002), improved survival time (mean difference, 15.63; 95% CI, 2.27-28.99; P = 0.02), and remission (OR, 15.63; 95% CI, 2.27-28.99; P = 0.02), but unraveled no obvious impact on the incidence of adverse events (OR, 3.27; 95% CI, 0.29-36.44; P = 0.34) or seizure (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 0.05-127.68; P = 0.64).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chloroquine supplementation may be effective to improve the treatment efficacy for glioblastoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":10449,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropharmacology","volume":"46 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNF.0000000000000533","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chloroquine supplementation may show some potential in improving the efficacy for glioblastoma, and this meta-analysis aimed to identify the efficacy of chloroquine supplementation for patients with glioblastoma.

Methods: Several databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library databases have been systematically searched through August 2022, and we included randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of chloroquine supplementation for glioblastoma. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model or fixed-effect model based on the heterogeneity.

Results: Four randomized controlled trials were finally included in this meta-analysis. In comparison with control group for glioblastoma, chloroquine supplementation was associated with substantially decreased mortality (odd ratio [OR], 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.53; P = 0.002), improved survival time (mean difference, 15.63; 95% CI, 2.27-28.99; P = 0.02), and remission (OR, 15.63; 95% CI, 2.27-28.99; P = 0.02), but unraveled no obvious impact on the incidence of adverse events (OR, 3.27; 95% CI, 0.29-36.44; P = 0.34) or seizure (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 0.05-127.68; P = 0.64).

Conclusions: Chloroquine supplementation may be effective to improve the treatment efficacy for glioblastoma.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
补充氯喹治疗胶质母细胞瘤:随机对照研究的荟萃分析。
简介:补充氯喹可能具有提高胶质母细胞瘤疗效的潜力,本荟萃分析旨在确定补充氯喹对胶质母细胞瘤患者的疗效。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、EBSCO和Cochrane图书馆数据库等多个数据库,并纳入评估补充氯喹治疗胶质母细胞瘤疗效的随机对照试验。基于异质性,采用随机效应模型或固定效应模型进行meta分析。结果:四项随机对照试验最终纳入本荟萃分析。与胶质母细胞瘤对照组相比,补充氯喹可显著降低死亡率(奇比[OR], 0.17;95%置信区间[CI], 0.06-0.53;P = 0.002),延长生存时间(平均差异15.63;95% ci, 2.27-28.99;P = 0.02),缓解(OR, 15.63;95% ci, 2.27-28.99;P = 0.02),但对不良事件发生率无明显影响(OR, 3.27;95% ci, 0.29-36.44;P = 0.34)或癫痫发作(or, 2.57;95% ci, 0.05-127.68;P = 0.64)。结论:补充氯喹可有效提高胶质母细胞瘤的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropharmacology
Clinical Neuropharmacology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuropharmacology is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the pharmacology of the nervous system in its broadest sense. Coverage ranges from such basic aspects as mechanisms of action, structure-activity relationships, and drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, to practical clinical problems such as drug interactions, drug toxicity, and therapy for specific syndromes and symptoms. The journal publishes original articles and brief reports, invited and submitted reviews, and letters to the editor. A regular feature is the Patient Management Series: in-depth case presentations with clinical questions and answers.
期刊最新文献
Translational Neuroscience Contributes to Understanding Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Dostoyevsky's "Brothers Karamazov" With Treatment Implications. Pharmacological Management of Acute and Chronic Insomnia: A Cross-Sectional Study. A Retrospective Study on Botulinum Toxin Injection in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis Related Tremor: A Treatment Option Worth Trying. Molecular Docking Analysis Reveals the Promising Role of Apigenin as a Potential Treatment for Neurological Disorders. A Real-World Experience of Rituximab: A Panacea in Therapy of Multiple Sclerosis in Low- and Middle-Income Setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1