{"title":"Interview and interior: Procedures of narrative surveys around 1900.","authors":"Anke Te Heesen","doi":"10.1017/S0269889723000054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the spring of 1893, the Austrian writer and critic Hermann Bahr began interviewing various people on antisemitism, a subject of heated discussion in the European feuilleton around 1900. \"Once again, I am travelling the world sounding out people's opinions and listening to what they have to say,\" he wrote in his introduction to a series of articles on that issue that appeared in the feuilleton of the Deutsche Zeitung between March and September 1893. A year later, the Berlin publishing house S. Fischer turned Bahr's articles into a book. Bahr conducted a total of thirty-eight interviews with prominent personages, such as August Bebel, Theodor Mommsen, Ernst Haeckel, Henrik Ibsen and Jules Simon. Bahr did not focus on the arguments in favour or against antisemitism. Instead, he set out explicitly to investigate the sentiments, perceptions and opinions on this topic within the cultured classes. Yet, as I will show in this article, Bahr tried to capture not only the \"sentiments\" [Empfindungen] aired by his interviewees, but also the settings and interiors in which the interviews took place. I argue that these descriptions of physical space served Bahr as authentication, as a three-dimensional certificate for the \"facts of opinion\" [Meinungstatsachen] he recorded.</p>","PeriodicalId":49562,"journal":{"name":"Science in Context","volume":"34 4","pages":"423-438"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science in Context","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889723000054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the spring of 1893, the Austrian writer and critic Hermann Bahr began interviewing various people on antisemitism, a subject of heated discussion in the European feuilleton around 1900. "Once again, I am travelling the world sounding out people's opinions and listening to what they have to say," he wrote in his introduction to a series of articles on that issue that appeared in the feuilleton of the Deutsche Zeitung between March and September 1893. A year later, the Berlin publishing house S. Fischer turned Bahr's articles into a book. Bahr conducted a total of thirty-eight interviews with prominent personages, such as August Bebel, Theodor Mommsen, Ernst Haeckel, Henrik Ibsen and Jules Simon. Bahr did not focus on the arguments in favour or against antisemitism. Instead, he set out explicitly to investigate the sentiments, perceptions and opinions on this topic within the cultured classes. Yet, as I will show in this article, Bahr tried to capture not only the "sentiments" [Empfindungen] aired by his interviewees, but also the settings and interiors in which the interviews took place. I argue that these descriptions of physical space served Bahr as authentication, as a three-dimensional certificate for the "facts of opinion" [Meinungstatsachen] he recorded.
1893年春天,奥地利作家和评论家赫尔曼·巴尔(Hermann Bahr)开始就反犹主义采访不同的人,这是1900年左右欧洲封建社会热烈讨论的话题。1893年3月至9月间,他在《德意志日报》(Deutsche Zeitung)的副刊上发表了一系列关于这个问题的文章,他在前言中写道:“我再一次周游世界,倾听人们的意见,倾听他们的看法。”一年后,柏林的S. Fischer出版社将巴尔的文章写成了一本书。Bahr总共采访了38位著名人士,如August Bebel, Theodor Mommsen, Ernst Haeckel, Henrik Ibsen和Jules Simon。巴尔并没有把重点放在支持或反对反犹主义的争论上。相反,他明确地着手调查文化阶层对这个话题的情绪、看法和意见。然而,正如我将在本文中展示的那样,Bahr不仅试图捕捉他的受访者所传达的“情感”,而且还试图捕捉采访发生的环境和内部。我认为,这些对物理空间的描述为巴尔提供了一种认证,作为他所记录的“观点事实”的三维证明。
期刊介绍:
Science in Context is an international journal edited at The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas, Tel Aviv University, with the support of the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute. It is devoted to the study of the sciences from the points of view of comparative epistemology and historical sociology of scientific knowledge. The journal is committed to an interdisciplinary approach to the study of science and its cultural development - it does not segregate considerations drawn from history, philosophy and sociology. Controversies within scientific knowledge and debates about methodology are presented in their contexts.