To Compare the Effectiveness of Granisetron Versus Ondansetron to Control Nausea and Vomiting During Lower Segment Cesarean Section Under Subarachnoid Block.

Anesthesia, Essays and Researches Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-09 DOI:10.4103/aer.aer_86_22
Milan Vijaykant Mehta, Palak Anilkumar Chudasama, Tushar Baria
{"title":"To Compare the Effectiveness of Granisetron Versus Ondansetron to Control Nausea and Vomiting During Lower Segment Cesarean Section Under Subarachnoid Block.","authors":"Milan Vijaykant Mehta,&nbsp;Palak Anilkumar Chudasama,&nbsp;Tushar Baria","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_86_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nausea and vomiting (NV) seen during and after lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) are due to increased intragastric pressure, hypotension, stretching the peritoneum (exteriorization of the uterus), excessive surgical manipulation and visceral stimulation, using opioids, using uterotonic agents, and the patient's mental status. Ondansetron and granisetron intravenous (i.v.) are useful for avoiding bradycardia and hypotension.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to study the effectiveness of granisetron versus ondansetron to control NV during LSCS under subarachnoid block.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty patients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia by intrathecal bupivacaine were randomly divided into two groups (40 pregnant females of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Classes I and II in each Group). Group 1 received granisetron 40 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> i.v. stat after clamping the cord and Group 2 given i.v. ondansetron 8 mg stat after clamping the cord. NV were observed at the \"early postoperative period (0-3 h)\" and \"late postoperative period (4-24 h).\"</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Student's <i>t</i>-test and Chi-square test were used to find out the statistical significance, <i>P</i> < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 29.3 years with 4.15 standard deviation (SD) and 28.3 years with 4.41 SD in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The mean duration of surgery was 53.1 min with 6.67 min SD and 57.7 min with 10.26 SD in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. In the \"early postoperative period,\" NV observed in 7.5% and 10.0% participants in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (<i>P</i> > 0.05), and in \"late postoperative period,\" NV observed in 0.0% and 22.5% participants in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Granisetron reduces the severity of spinal-induced hypotension, need for rescue vasopressor, and incidence of nausea.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 3","pages":"378-380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813993/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_86_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Nausea and vomiting (NV) seen during and after lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) are due to increased intragastric pressure, hypotension, stretching the peritoneum (exteriorization of the uterus), excessive surgical manipulation and visceral stimulation, using opioids, using uterotonic agents, and the patient's mental status. Ondansetron and granisetron intravenous (i.v.) are useful for avoiding bradycardia and hypotension.

Objectives: The objective of this study is to study the effectiveness of granisetron versus ondansetron to control NV during LSCS under subarachnoid block.

Materials and methods: Eighty patients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia by intrathecal bupivacaine were randomly divided into two groups (40 pregnant females of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Classes I and II in each Group). Group 1 received granisetron 40 mg.kg-1 i.v. stat after clamping the cord and Group 2 given i.v. ondansetron 8 mg stat after clamping the cord. NV were observed at the "early postoperative period (0-3 h)" and "late postoperative period (4-24 h)."

Statistical analysis used: Student's t-test and Chi-square test were used to find out the statistical significance, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The mean age was 29.3 years with 4.15 standard deviation (SD) and 28.3 years with 4.41 SD in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The mean duration of surgery was 53.1 min with 6.67 min SD and 57.7 min with 10.26 SD in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. In the "early postoperative period," NV observed in 7.5% and 10.0% participants in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P > 0.05), and in "late postoperative period," NV observed in 0.0% and 22.5% participants in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Granisetron reduces the severity of spinal-induced hypotension, need for rescue vasopressor, and incidence of nausea.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较蛛网膜下腔阻滞下段剖宫产时格拉司琼与昂丹司琼控制恶心呕吐的效果。
背景:下段剖宫产术(LSCS)期间和之后出现的恶心和呕吐(NV)是由于胃内压力增加、低血压、腹膜拉伸(子宫外化)、过度的手术操作和内脏刺激、使用阿片类药物、使用子宫强化剂以及患者的精神状态。昂丹司琼和格拉司琼静脉注射(i.v.)有助于避免心动过缓和低血压。目的:本研究的目的是研究格拉司琼与昂丹司琼在蛛网膜下腔阻滞下LSCS期间控制NV的有效性。材料和方法:80例在鞘内布比卡因脊麻下进行选择性剖宫产的患者被随机分为两组(每组40名美国麻醉师协会的孕妇,身体状况I级和II级)。第1组在夹紧脐带后静脉注射格拉司琼40mg.kg-1,第2组在夹紧脊髓后静脉注射昂丹司琼8mg。NV在“术后早期(0-3小时)”和“术后晚期(4-24小时)”观察到。采用统计学分析:采用Student t检验和卡方检验找出统计学意义,P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:第1组和第2组的平均年龄分别为29.3岁和28.3岁,标准差分别为4.15和4.41。第1组和第2组的平均手术持续时间分别为53.1分钟(6.67分钟SD)和57.7分钟(10.26 SD)。在“术后早期”,第1组和第2组分别有7.5%和10.0%的受试者观察到NV(P>0.05),而在“术后期”,第一组和第二组分别有0.0%和22.5%的受测者观察到了NV(P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparison of two prophylactic doses of ephedrine to attenuate the hemodynamic responses in adults receiving propofol in general anesthesia; a South Indian perspective Comparison of hemodynamic stability with continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring and intermittent oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Thoracic epidural analgesia vs. intravenous analgesia in blunt thoracic trauma patients, managed conservatively with noninvasive ventilation (NIV): A prospective observational study Comparison of postoperative analgesic effects of gelfoam soaked with ropivacaine 0.5% and gelfoam soaked with dexamethasone 8 mg with placebo in single-level lumbar laminectomy A Randomised Control Study Comparing C-MAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope (Hyper Angulated Blade) and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Insertion of a Double-Lumen Tube in Patients Undergoing Elective Thoracotomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1