Preliminary validation of the self-report measure assessing experiences of negative independent and dependent event frequency in Japanese university students.

Pub Date : 2022-07-30 DOI:10.1007/s10942-022-00469-9
Akira Hasegawa, Shin-Ichi Oura, Tetsuya Yamamoto, Yoshihiko Kunisato, Yoshikazu Fukui
{"title":"Preliminary validation of the self-report measure assessing experiences of negative independent and dependent event frequency in Japanese university students.","authors":"Akira Hasegawa, Shin-Ichi Oura, Tetsuya Yamamoto, Yoshihiko Kunisato, Yoshikazu Fukui","doi":"10.1007/s10942-022-00469-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the past, different stress generation studies have used self-report measures comprising different items to assess each category of negative events. Moreover, the validity of these scales has not been adequately investigated. Therefore, we developed a self-report measure dedicated to assessing experiences of negative interpersonal dependent events, negative non-interpersonal dependent events, and negative independent events in university students, which was named the Negative Independent/Dependent Events Scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Japanese undergraduate students (N = 247; mean age = 19.18 years, <i>SD</i> = 3.08) responded to the Negative Independent/Dependent Events Scale, which had items selected for adequate content validity. They also responded to self-report measures of depressive symptoms, reassurance-seeking behaviors, inattention, and lack of perseverance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the negative events subscales had moderate positive correlations with depressive symptoms. In addition, the negative interpersonal dependent events subscale showed a moderate positive correlation with reassurance-seeking behaviors, and the negative non-interpersonal dependent events subscale showed a strong positive correlation with inattention. Furthermore, the negative non-interpersonal dependent events subscale was more strongly correlated with inattention than the other two negative events subscales. In contrast, the negative interpersonal dependent events subscale was more strongly correlated with reassurance-seeking behaviors than with the negative independent events subscale but not more strongly than with the negative non-interpersonal dependent events subscale.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicated the acceptable construct validity of the Negative Independent/Dependent Events Scale. However, further research is necessary to establish the discriminant validity of the negative interpersonal dependent events subscale and the negative non-interpersonal dependent events subscale.</p>","PeriodicalId":73926,"journal":{"name":"","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9362106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-022-00469-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the past, different stress generation studies have used self-report measures comprising different items to assess each category of negative events. Moreover, the validity of these scales has not been adequately investigated. Therefore, we developed a self-report measure dedicated to assessing experiences of negative interpersonal dependent events, negative non-interpersonal dependent events, and negative independent events in university students, which was named the Negative Independent/Dependent Events Scale.

Methods: Japanese undergraduate students (N = 247; mean age = 19.18 years, SD = 3.08) responded to the Negative Independent/Dependent Events Scale, which had items selected for adequate content validity. They also responded to self-report measures of depressive symptoms, reassurance-seeking behaviors, inattention, and lack of perseverance.

Results: All the negative events subscales had moderate positive correlations with depressive symptoms. In addition, the negative interpersonal dependent events subscale showed a moderate positive correlation with reassurance-seeking behaviors, and the negative non-interpersonal dependent events subscale showed a strong positive correlation with inattention. Furthermore, the negative non-interpersonal dependent events subscale was more strongly correlated with inattention than the other two negative events subscales. In contrast, the negative interpersonal dependent events subscale was more strongly correlated with reassurance-seeking behaviors than with the negative independent events subscale but not more strongly than with the negative non-interpersonal dependent events subscale.

Conclusions: These findings indicated the acceptable construct validity of the Negative Independent/Dependent Events Scale. However, further research is necessary to establish the discriminant validity of the negative interpersonal dependent events subscale and the negative non-interpersonal dependent events subscale.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初步验证日本大学生评估负面独立事件和从属事件频率体验的自我报告测量法。
背景:过去,不同的压力产生研究都使用自我报告量表,其中包括不同的项目来评估各类负面事件。此外,这些量表的有效性尚未得到充分研究。因此,我们开发了一种自我报告量表,专门用于评估大学生在消极人际依赖事件、消极非人际依赖事件和消极独立事件方面的体验,并将其命名为消极独立/依赖事件量表:日本大学生(人数=247;平均年龄=19.18 岁,标准差=3.08)对消极独立/依赖事件量表进行了问卷调查。他们还对抑郁症状、寻求安慰行为、注意力不集中和缺乏毅力等方面的自我报告测量进行了回答:所有负性事件分量表与抑郁症状呈中度正相关。此外,负性人际依赖事件分量表与寻求安慰行为呈中度正相关,负性非人际依赖事件分量表与注意力不集中呈强正相关。此外,与其他两个负性事件分量表相比,负性非人际依赖事件分量表与注意力不集中的相关性更强。相比之下,消极人际依赖事件分量表与寻求安慰行为的相关性比消极独立事件分量表更强,但与消极非人际依赖事件分量表的相关性并不更强:这些研究结果表明,消极独立/依赖事件量表的构建有效性是可以接受的。结论:这些研究结果表明,消极独立/依赖事件量表的建构效度是可以接受的,但是还需要进一步的研究来确定消极人际依赖事件分量表和消极非人际依赖事件分量表的判别效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1