下载PDF
{"title":"Tensions in Taxonomies: Current Understanding and Future Directions in the Pathobiologic Basis and Treatment of Group 1 and Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension.","authors":"Sue Gu, Khushboo Goel, Lindsay M Forbes, Vitaly O Kheyfets, Yen-Rei A Yu, Rubin M Tuder, Kurt R Stenmark","doi":"10.1002/cphy.c220010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the over 100 years since the recognition of pulmonary hypertension (PH), immense progress and significant achievements have been made with regard to understanding the pathophysiology of the disease and its treatment. These advances have been mostly in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH), which was classified as Group 1 Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) at the Second World Symposia on PH in 1998. However, the pathobiology of PH due to chronic lung disease, classified as Group 3 PH, remains poorly understood and its treatments thus remain limited. We review the history of the classification of the five groups of PH and aim to provide a state-of-the-art review of the understanding of the pathogenesis of Group 1 PH and Group 3 PH including insights gained from novel high-throughput omics technologies that have revealed heterogeneities within these categories as well as similarities between them. Leveraging the substantial gains made in understanding the genomics, epigenomics, proteomics, and metabolomics of PAH to understand the full spectrum of the complex, heterogeneous disease of PH is needed. Multimodal omics data as well as supervised and unbiased machine learning approaches after careful consideration of the powerful advantages as well as of the limitations and pitfalls of these technologies could lead to earlier diagnosis, more precise risk stratification, better predictions of disease response, new sub-phenotype groupings within types of PH, and identification of shared pathways between PAH and other types of PH that could lead to new treatment targets. © 2023 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 13:4295-4319, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":10573,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Physiology","volume":"13 1","pages":"4295-4319"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392122/pdf/nihms-1916391.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c220010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
引用
批量引用
Abstract
In the over 100 years since the recognition of pulmonary hypertension (PH), immense progress and significant achievements have been made with regard to understanding the pathophysiology of the disease and its treatment. These advances have been mostly in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH), which was classified as Group 1 Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) at the Second World Symposia on PH in 1998. However, the pathobiology of PH due to chronic lung disease, classified as Group 3 PH, remains poorly understood and its treatments thus remain limited. We review the history of the classification of the five groups of PH and aim to provide a state-of-the-art review of the understanding of the pathogenesis of Group 1 PH and Group 3 PH including insights gained from novel high-throughput omics technologies that have revealed heterogeneities within these categories as well as similarities between them. Leveraging the substantial gains made in understanding the genomics, epigenomics, proteomics, and metabolomics of PAH to understand the full spectrum of the complex, heterogeneous disease of PH is needed. Multimodal omics data as well as supervised and unbiased machine learning approaches after careful consideration of the powerful advantages as well as of the limitations and pitfalls of these technologies could lead to earlier diagnosis, more precise risk stratification, better predictions of disease response, new sub-phenotype groupings within types of PH, and identification of shared pathways between PAH and other types of PH that could lead to new treatment targets. © 2023 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 13:4295-4319, 2023.
分类上的紧张:1组和3组肺动脉高压的病理基础和治疗的当前认识和未来方向。
自肺动脉高压(pulmonary hypertension, PH)被认识以来的100多年里,在认识该病的病理生理和治疗方面取得了巨大的进展和显著的成就。这些进展主要集中在特发性肺动脉高压(IPAH)方面,IPAH在1998年第二次世界肺动脉高压研讨会上被归类为1组肺动脉高压(PH)。然而,慢性肺部疾病引起的PH(归类为第3组PH)的病理生物学仍然知之甚少,因此其治疗仍然有限。我们回顾了五组酸碱度的分类历史,旨在提供对1组酸碱度和3组酸碱度发病机制的最新了解,包括从新的高通量组学技术中获得的见解,这些技术揭示了这些类别中的异质性以及它们之间的相似性。利用在了解多环芳烃基因组学、表观基因组学、蛋白质组学和代谢组学方面取得的实质性进展,了解复杂的、异质性的PH疾病的全谱是必要的。在仔细考虑了这些技术的强大优势以及局限性和缺陷之后,多模态组学数据以及监督和无偏见的机器学习方法可能导致更早的诊断,更精确的风险分层,更好的疾病反应预测,PH类型内的新亚表型分组,以及确定PAH和其他类型PH之间的共享途径,这可能导致新的治疗目标。©2023美国生理学会。中国生物医学工程学报(英文版),2023。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。