'Well, the Child Can't Choose, Right?': Foster Children's Participation Experiences of Child Protection Removal Practices.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-14 DOI:10.1007/s10560-022-00911-y
Helen Saarnik, Ingrid Sindi, Karmen Toros
{"title":"<i>'Well, the Child Can't Choose, Right?'</i>: Foster Children's Participation Experiences of Child Protection Removal Practices.","authors":"Helen Saarnik, Ingrid Sindi, Karmen Toros","doi":"10.1007/s10560-022-00911-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, children have the right to voice their opinions and participate in decision-making in matters affecting their lives. Furthermore, professionals working with children have the responsibility to always make the best interests of the child the priority when contemplating decisions that have an impact on the child, including by ensuring that the child's concerns are paid attention to and their opinion is taken into consideration. However, studies indicate that the opposite occurs in practice and that decision-making in child protection cases often excludes children's views, especially in alternative care. In this qualitative study, 31 foster children's perspectives were gathered through in-depth semi-structured and focus group interviews with the aim of exploring the children's participation and perspectives based on their lived experiences within the context of child protection removal practice in Estonia. Findings indicate several obstacles that hinder children's meaningful participation, including not receiving adequate or truthful information about their removal and placement. Furthermore, they had no trustworthy adult to talk to and, therefore, they lacked opportunities to discuss their views or concerns with someone capable of acting on them. These findings suggest that children's active and meaningful participation in alternative care requires more attention and implications in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51512,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9840164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-022-00911-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, children have the right to voice their opinions and participate in decision-making in matters affecting their lives. Furthermore, professionals working with children have the responsibility to always make the best interests of the child the priority when contemplating decisions that have an impact on the child, including by ensuring that the child's concerns are paid attention to and their opinion is taken into consideration. However, studies indicate that the opposite occurs in practice and that decision-making in child protection cases often excludes children's views, especially in alternative care. In this qualitative study, 31 foster children's perspectives were gathered through in-depth semi-structured and focus group interviews with the aim of exploring the children's participation and perspectives based on their lived experiences within the context of child protection removal practice in Estonia. Findings indicate several obstacles that hinder children's meaningful participation, including not receiving adequate or truthful information about their removal and placement. Furthermore, they had no trustworthy adult to talk to and, therefore, they lacked opportunities to discuss their views or concerns with someone capable of acting on them. These findings suggest that children's active and meaningful participation in alternative care requires more attention and implications in practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孩子无法选择,对吗?寄养儿童对儿童保护移居做法的参与体验》。
根据联合国《儿童权利公约》,儿童有权就影响其生活的事项发表意见并参与决策。此外,从事儿童工作的专业人员在考虑对儿童有影响的决定时,有责任始终把儿童的最大利益放在首位,包括确保儿童的关切得到关注,他们的意见得到考虑。然而,研究表明,实际情况恰恰相反,儿童保护案件的决策往往排除儿童的意见,尤其是在替代性照料中。在这项定性研究中,通过深入的半结构式访谈和焦点小组访谈,收集了 31 名寄养儿童的观点,目的是根据他们在爱沙尼亚儿童保护迁移实践中的生活经历,探索儿童的参与和观点。研究结果表明,有几种障碍阻碍了儿童有意义的参与,其中包括没有收到有关其迁移和安置的充分或真实的信息。此外,他们没有值得信赖的成年人可以倾诉,因此,他们没有机会与有能力就他们的观点或担忧采取行动的人讨论。这些调查结果表明,儿童积极和有意义地参与替代性照料在实践中需要更多的关注和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: The Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal (CASW) features original articles that focus on social work practice with children, adolescents, and their families. Topics include issues affecting a variety of specific populations in special settings.  CASW welcomes a range of scholarly contributions focused on children and adolescents, including theoretical papers, narrative case studies, historical analyses, traditional reviews of the literature, descriptive studies, single-system research designs, correlational investigations, methodological works, pre-experimental, quasi-experimental and experimental evaluations, meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Manuscripts involving qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods are welcome to be submitted, as are papers grounded in one or more theoretical orientations, or those that are not based on any formal theory. CASW values different disciplines and interdisciplinary work that informs social work practice and policy. Authors from public health, nursing, psychology, sociology, and other disciplines are encouraged to submit manuscripts. All manuscripts should include specific implications for social work policy and practice with children and adolescents. Appropriate fields of practice include interpersonal practice, small groups, families, organizations, communities, policy practice, nationally-oriented work, and international studies.  Authors considering publication in CASW should review the following editorial: Schelbe, L., & Thyer, B. A. (2019). Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Editorial Policy: Guidelines for Authors. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 36, 75-80.
期刊最新文献
The Emotional and Behavioral Impact of Social Connections and Observant Adults in the Neighborhood, School, and Family on Youth “We Do the Best We Can with What We Have”: Reflections from Residential Care Stakeholders on the Impacts of COVID-19 Characteristics and Views of Young Unaccompanied Migrants Transitioning to Independent Living in the Catalan (Spain) Protection System Implementing and Evaluating Manualized Interventions in U.S. Organizations Serving Youth with Foster Care Experience: Lessons Learned from the Field Exploring Retrospective Place Attachment Toward Foster Homes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1