The Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19 in Patients on Warfarin: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

Mustafa Oğuz, Tayyar Akbulut, Faysal Saylık, Abdulcabbar Sipal, Murat Demirci, Emrah Erdal
{"title":"The Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19 in Patients on Warfarin: A Propensity Score Matching Study.","authors":"Mustafa Oğuz,&nbsp;Tayyar Akbulut,&nbsp;Faysal Saylık,&nbsp;Abdulcabbar Sipal,&nbsp;Murat Demirci,&nbsp;Emrah Erdal","doi":"10.5543/tkda.2022.22344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COVID-19 is associated with vascular thrombosis in critical patients. However, warfarin has not been adequately studied in patients with COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of warfarin, a potent oral anticoagulant, was of clinical benefit in patients with COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of COVID-19 patients diagnosed at 3 different centers in Turkey between April 2020 and April 2021. Patients were grouped by whether they were taking warfarin or not. Propensity score matching analysis was used to compare the dif ferences between the groups in mortality, hospitalization, and admission to the intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A propensity score analysis was performed on 128 patients in the warfarin group and 372 patients in the control group. After matching, 84 pairs of patients were compared. The patients in the control group were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (33.3% vs. 14.3%, respectively; P=.007) and had longer hospital stays than the warfarin group (7.1 vs. 14.1 days; P=.005). The warfarin group had a lower death rate compared to the control group (7.1% vs. 27.4%, respectively; P=.001), and surviving patients were sig nificantly more likely to be in the warfarin group than the control group (56.1% vs. 20.7%, respectively; P=.001). In patients on warfarin, there was a lower incidence of in-hospital death (log-rank test P=.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Warfarin therapy could provide clinical benefits in patients with COVID-19. The current data highlight the importance of potent anticoagulation in the treatment of COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":46993,"journal":{"name":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi-Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi-Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2022.22344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 is associated with vascular thrombosis in critical patients. However, warfarin has not been adequately studied in patients with COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of warfarin, a potent oral anticoagulant, was of clinical benefit in patients with COVID-19.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of COVID-19 patients diagnosed at 3 different centers in Turkey between April 2020 and April 2021. Patients were grouped by whether they were taking warfarin or not. Propensity score matching analysis was used to compare the dif ferences between the groups in mortality, hospitalization, and admission to the intensive care unit.

Results: A propensity score analysis was performed on 128 patients in the warfarin group and 372 patients in the control group. After matching, 84 pairs of patients were compared. The patients in the control group were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (33.3% vs. 14.3%, respectively; P=.007) and had longer hospital stays than the warfarin group (7.1 vs. 14.1 days; P=.005). The warfarin group had a lower death rate compared to the control group (7.1% vs. 27.4%, respectively; P=.001), and surviving patients were sig nificantly more likely to be in the warfarin group than the control group (56.1% vs. 20.7%, respectively; P=.001). In patients on warfarin, there was a lower incidence of in-hospital death (log-rank test P=.005).

Conclusions: Warfarin therapy could provide clinical benefits in patients with COVID-19. The current data highlight the importance of potent anticoagulation in the treatment of COVID-19.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
华法林治疗的COVID-19患者的临床结局:倾向评分匹配研究
背景:COVID-19与危重患者血管血栓形成相关。然而,华法林在COVID-19患者中的应用尚未得到充分研究。本研究旨在评估在COVID-19患者中使用华法林(一种有效的口服抗凝剂)是否具有临床益处。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2020年4月至2021年4月期间在土耳其3个不同中心诊断的COVID-19患者。患者根据是否服用华法林进行分组。采用倾向评分匹配分析比较两组在死亡率、住院率和入住重症监护病房方面的差异。结果:对华法林组128例患者和对照组372例患者进行倾向评分分析。配对后,对84对患者进行比较。对照组患者更有可能入住重症监护病房(分别为33.3%和14.3%;P=.007),且住院时间长于华法林组(7.1天vs. 14.1天;P = .005)。华法林组的死亡率低于对照组(分别为7.1%和27.4%;P=.001),存活患者在华法林组的可能性显著高于对照组(分别为56.1%比20.7%;P =措施)。在华法林治疗的患者中,住院死亡发生率较低(log-rank检验P= 0.005)。结论:华法林治疗可为COVID-19患者提供临床获益。目前的数据强调了强效抗凝治疗COVID-19的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Variation of Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Related to Different Vessel Morphology. Debulking of Giant Right Ventricular Lead Vegetation by Percutaneous Approach Under the Direct Real-Time Intracardiac Echocardiography Visualization. Thyroid Functions Are Associated with All-Cause Long-Term Mortality in Elderly Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. The Predictive Role of Small Airway Dysfunction in Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Predictive Value of the SCORE, SCORE2, and Pooled Cohort Risk Equation Systems in Patients with Hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1