Reduction in cycle time for a rapid polymerase chain reaction diagnostic test at the point of care.

IF 0.9 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Infection Prevention Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17571774221148072
Lochana Nanayakkara, Talia R Pettigrew, Jenny Overton, Paul L Ryan, Avaneet K Pawar, Hebe M Midson, Mark J Coldwell, Joanne E Martin
{"title":"Reduction in cycle time for a rapid polymerase chain reaction diagnostic test at the point of care.","authors":"Lochana Nanayakkara,&nbsp;Talia R Pettigrew,&nbsp;Jenny Overton,&nbsp;Paul L Ryan,&nbsp;Avaneet K Pawar,&nbsp;Hebe M Midson,&nbsp;Mark J Coldwell,&nbsp;Joanne E Martin","doi":"10.1177/17571774221148072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid testing facilitates safe and effective diagnosis, but the true speed of the process is the time from collection of a sample to delivery of an accurate and reliable test result - 'end-to-end' time. Transport, unpacking and relaying of information can extend this time considerably beyond the minimum laboratory turnaround times as stipulated by PCR testing protocols.</p><p><strong>Aim/objective: </strong>This study aimed to minimise time needed to ascertain SARS-CoV-2 status prior to treatment in a UK Dental Hospital using a novel, mobile, direct to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) workflow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Process flow analysis and PDSA (Plan, Do, Study, Act) cycles for rapid continuous improvement were employed in a service improvement programme. Primerdesign™ q16 rapid PCR instruments and PROmate® COVID-19 direct assays were used for molecular testing.</p><p><strong>Findings/results: </strong>We showed a reduction in real-world end-to-end time for a diagnostic test from 240 min to 85 min (65% reduction) over a 4-week period.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>New rapid technologies have become available that reduce analytical time to under 90 min, but the real-world clinical implementation of the test requires a fully integrated workflow from clinic to reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":16094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection Prevention","volume":"24 1","pages":"23-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813656/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17571774221148072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Rapid testing facilitates safe and effective diagnosis, but the true speed of the process is the time from collection of a sample to delivery of an accurate and reliable test result - 'end-to-end' time. Transport, unpacking and relaying of information can extend this time considerably beyond the minimum laboratory turnaround times as stipulated by PCR testing protocols.

Aim/objective: This study aimed to minimise time needed to ascertain SARS-CoV-2 status prior to treatment in a UK Dental Hospital using a novel, mobile, direct to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) workflow.

Methods: Process flow analysis and PDSA (Plan, Do, Study, Act) cycles for rapid continuous improvement were employed in a service improvement programme. Primerdesign™ q16 rapid PCR instruments and PROmate® COVID-19 direct assays were used for molecular testing.

Findings/results: We showed a reduction in real-world end-to-end time for a diagnostic test from 240 min to 85 min (65% reduction) over a 4-week period.

Discussion: New rapid technologies have become available that reduce analytical time to under 90 min, but the real-world clinical implementation of the test requires a fully integrated workflow from clinic to reporting.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缩短护理点快速聚合酶链反应诊断试验的周期时间。
背景:快速检测有助于安全有效的诊断,但该过程的真正速度是从收集样本到提供准确可靠的检测结果的时间——“端到端”时间。运输、拆包和传递信息可大大延长这一时间,超出PCR检测协议规定的最短实验室周转时间。目的/目的:本研究旨在使用一种新颖的、可移动的、直接到聚合酶链反应(PCR)的工作流程,最大限度地减少在英国牙科医院治疗前确定SARS-CoV-2状态所需的时间。方法:采用流程流分析和PDSA(计划、实施、研究、行动)循环进行快速持续改进。采用Primerdesign™q16快速PCR仪和PROmate®COVID-19直接测定法进行分子检测。发现/结果:我们发现,在4周的时间内,诊断测试的实际端到端时间从240分钟减少到85分钟(减少65%)。讨论:新的快速技术已经可用,可以将分析时间减少到90分钟以下,但是实际的临床实施测试需要从临床到报告的完全集成的工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Infection Prevention
Journal of Infection Prevention Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Infection Prevention is the professional publication of the Infection Prevention Society. The aim of the journal is to advance the evidence base in infection prevention and control, and to provide a publishing platform for all health professionals interested in this field of practice. Journal of Infection Prevention is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication containing a wide range of articles: ·Original primary research studies ·Qualitative and quantitative studies ·Reviews of the evidence on various topics ·Practice development project reports ·Guidelines for practice ·Case studies ·Overviews of infectious diseases and their causative organisms ·Audit and surveillance studies/projects
期刊最新文献
Diary. Letter re: Optimizing healthcare staffing for infection prevention: Insights from the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology's staffing pattern calculator. The effect of the theory of planned behavior based hand hygiene intervention program on the health outcomes and school absenteeism of the primary school students: Quasi-experimental study. Real-time intervention to increase daily chlorhexidine bathing and reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections. Letter re: Glove Use/Hand Disinfection-Index (GUHDI): A new metric for hand hygiene quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1