Digital Educational Interventions for the Development of Advanced Care Planning Skills for Medical Practitioners: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1097/CEH.0000000000000460
Kavisha Shah, Anna Janssen, Candice Donnelly, Tim Shaw
{"title":"Digital Educational Interventions for the Development of Advanced Care Planning Skills for Medical Practitioners: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Kavisha Shah,&nbsp;Anna Janssen,&nbsp;Candice Donnelly,&nbsp;Tim Shaw","doi":"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical practitioners are important facilitators of advanced care planning but are often reluctant to engage in these conversations with patients and their families. Barriers to participation can be addressed through medical education for medical practitioners.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The primary objective was to examine the extent to which digital educational interventions are used to foster advanced care planning skills. Secondary objectives include understanding the acceptability of these interventions and whether electronic health records can be used to personalize learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online databases were used to identify relevant articles published from 2008 to 2021. Nine articles which evaluated the impact of digital learning for medical practitioners were selected. Studies eligible for inclusion in the review assessed changes in knowledge, attitudes, and practice regarding skills used in advanced care planning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All publications used a pre-post study design with education delivered solely online. Only three studies focused on completing advance care plans or directives (33%). All but two studies recorded improvements in knowledge and/or attitudes toward planning (78%) while three studies recorded improvements in clinical practice (33%). The review suggests prior clinical or personal experiences could be used to personalize education.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The literature revealed that using digital education to develop advanced care planning skills is relatively unexplored despite the ability of this type of learning to improve professional knowledge and confidence. Digital devices can also improve access to relevant information at the point-of-care. Personalized interventions that incorporate prior clinical experiences, potentially extracted from health records, could be used to optimize outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":"43 3","pages":"181-187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000460","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical practitioners are important facilitators of advanced care planning but are often reluctant to engage in these conversations with patients and their families. Barriers to participation can be addressed through medical education for medical practitioners.

Introduction: The primary objective was to examine the extent to which digital educational interventions are used to foster advanced care planning skills. Secondary objectives include understanding the acceptability of these interventions and whether electronic health records can be used to personalize learning.

Methods: Online databases were used to identify relevant articles published from 2008 to 2021. Nine articles which evaluated the impact of digital learning for medical practitioners were selected. Studies eligible for inclusion in the review assessed changes in knowledge, attitudes, and practice regarding skills used in advanced care planning.

Results: All publications used a pre-post study design with education delivered solely online. Only three studies focused on completing advance care plans or directives (33%). All but two studies recorded improvements in knowledge and/or attitudes toward planning (78%) while three studies recorded improvements in clinical practice (33%). The review suggests prior clinical or personal experiences could be used to personalize education.

Discussion: The literature revealed that using digital education to develop advanced care planning skills is relatively unexplored despite the ability of this type of learning to improve professional knowledge and confidence. Digital devices can also improve access to relevant information at the point-of-care. Personalized interventions that incorporate prior clinical experiences, potentially extracted from health records, could be used to optimize outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字教育干预发展高级护理计划技能为医疗从业者:范围审查。
背景:医疗从业者是高级护理计划的重要推动者,但往往不愿与患者及其家属进行这些对话。参与的障碍可以通过对医生的医学教育来解决。前言:主要目的是研究数字教育干预在多大程度上用于培养高级护理计划技能。次要目标包括了解这些干预措施的可接受性,以及电子健康记录是否可用于个性化学习。方法:使用在线数据库对2008 - 2021年发表的相关文章进行检索。九篇文章评估了数字学习对医疗从业者的影响。有资格纳入本综述的研究评估了在高级护理计划中使用的技能方面的知识、态度和实践的变化。结果:所有出版物均采用在线教育的前后研究设计。只有三项研究关注于完成预先护理计划或指示(33%)。除了两项研究外,所有研究都记录了对计划的知识和/或态度的改善(78%),而三项研究记录了临床实践的改善(33%)。该研究表明,先前的临床或个人经历可用于个性化教育。讨论:文献显示,尽管这种类型的学习能够提高专业知识和信心,但利用数字教育来培养高级护理计划技能的探索相对较少。数字设备还可以改善在护理点对相关信息的获取。结合以往临床经验的个性化干预措施(可能从健康记录中提取)可用于优化结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Continuing Education is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.
期刊最新文献
Differences in Physician Performance and Self-rated Confidence on High- and Low-Stakes Knowledge Assessments in Board Certification. Paving the Way Forward for Evidence-Based Continuing Professional Development. Development of a Communication Skills Training to Enhance Effective Team Communication in Oncology. Evolution of a Continuing Professional Development Program Based on a Community of Practice Model for Health Care Professionals in Resource-Limited Settings. Where do Physiotherapists Search for Information? Barriers in Translating Scientific Information into Clinical Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1