Recommended rates of azoxystrobin and tebuconazole seem to be environmentally safe but ineffective against target fungi.

IF 2.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecotoxicology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s10646-023-02619-w
Libânia Queirós, Nuno Aguiar, Patrícia Pereira, Fernando J M Gonçalves, Artur Alves, Joana Luísa Pereira
{"title":"Recommended rates of azoxystrobin and tebuconazole seem to be environmentally safe but ineffective against target fungi.","authors":"Libânia Queirós,&nbsp;Nuno Aguiar,&nbsp;Patrícia Pereira,&nbsp;Fernando J M Gonçalves,&nbsp;Artur Alves,&nbsp;Joana Luísa Pereira","doi":"10.1007/s10646-023-02619-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of fungicides in agriculture has been playing a role in the enhancement of agricultural yields through the control of pathogens causing serious diseases in crops. Still, adverse environmental and human health effects resulting from its application have been reported. In this study, the possibility of readjusting the formulation of a commercial product combining azoxystrobin and tebuconazole (active ingredients - AIs; Custodia®) towards environmentally safer alternative(s) was investigated. Specifically, the sensitivity of non-target aquatic communities to each AI was first evaluated by applying the Species Sensitivity Distributions (SSDs) approach. Then, mixtures of these AIs were tested in a non-target organism (Raphidocelis subcapitata) denoting sensitivity to both AIs as assessed from SSDs. The resulting data supported the design of the last stage of this study, where mixtures of those AIs at equivalent vs. alternative ratios and rates as in the commercial formulation were tested against two target fungal species: Pyrenophora teres CBS 123929 and Rhynchosporium secalis CBS 110524. The comparison between the sensitivity of non-target aquatic species and the corresponding efficacy towards target fungi revealed that currently applied mixture and rates of these AIs are generally environmentally safe (antagonistic interaction; concentrations below the EC<sub>1</sub> for R. subcapitata and generally below the HC<sub>5</sub> for aquatic non-target communities), but ineffective against target organisms (maximum levels of inhibition of 70 and 50% in P. teres CBS 123929 and R. secalis CBS 110524, respectively). Results additionally suggest a potentiation of the effects of the AIs by the other formulants added to the commercial product at tested rates. Overall, this study corroborates that commercial products can be optimized during design stages based on a systematic ecotoxicological testing for ingredient interactions and actual efficacy against targets. This could be a valuable pathway to reduce environmental contamination during transition to a more sustainable agricultural production.</p>","PeriodicalId":11497,"journal":{"name":"Ecotoxicology","volume":"32 1","pages":"102-113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9883303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-023-02619-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of fungicides in agriculture has been playing a role in the enhancement of agricultural yields through the control of pathogens causing serious diseases in crops. Still, adverse environmental and human health effects resulting from its application have been reported. In this study, the possibility of readjusting the formulation of a commercial product combining azoxystrobin and tebuconazole (active ingredients - AIs; Custodia®) towards environmentally safer alternative(s) was investigated. Specifically, the sensitivity of non-target aquatic communities to each AI was first evaluated by applying the Species Sensitivity Distributions (SSDs) approach. Then, mixtures of these AIs were tested in a non-target organism (Raphidocelis subcapitata) denoting sensitivity to both AIs as assessed from SSDs. The resulting data supported the design of the last stage of this study, where mixtures of those AIs at equivalent vs. alternative ratios and rates as in the commercial formulation were tested against two target fungal species: Pyrenophora teres CBS 123929 and Rhynchosporium secalis CBS 110524. The comparison between the sensitivity of non-target aquatic species and the corresponding efficacy towards target fungi revealed that currently applied mixture and rates of these AIs are generally environmentally safe (antagonistic interaction; concentrations below the EC1 for R. subcapitata and generally below the HC5 for aquatic non-target communities), but ineffective against target organisms (maximum levels of inhibition of 70 and 50% in P. teres CBS 123929 and R. secalis CBS 110524, respectively). Results additionally suggest a potentiation of the effects of the AIs by the other formulants added to the commercial product at tested rates. Overall, this study corroborates that commercial products can be optimized during design stages based on a systematic ecotoxicological testing for ingredient interactions and actual efficacy against targets. This could be a valuable pathway to reduce environmental contamination during transition to a more sustainable agricultural production.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推荐剂量的氮唑菌酯和戊唑唑似乎对环境安全,但对目标真菌无效。
杀菌剂在农业中的使用通过控制引起作物严重疾病的病原体,在提高农业产量方面发挥了作用。尽管如此,仍有关于其应用对环境和人类健康造成不利影响的报告。在本研究中,重新调整一种由氮嘧菌酯和戊康唑(有效成分- AIs)组成的商业产品的配方的可能性;对环境更安全的替代品进行了调查。具体而言,非目标水生群落对每种人工智能的敏感性首先通过应用物种敏感性分布(ssd)方法进行评估。然后,在非目标生物(Raphidocelis subcapitata)中测试这些ai的混合物,表明从ssd评估对这两种ai的敏感性。结果数据支持了本研究最后阶段的设计,在该阶段中,以商业配方中相同的比例和比率混合这些AIs,对两种目标真菌进行了测试:Pyrenophora teres CBS 123929和Rhynchosporium secalis CBS 110524。通过对非目标水生物种的敏感性和对目标真菌的药效比较,发现目前应用的混合剂和比例总体上是环境安全的(拮抗相互作用;对小头田鼠的浓度低于EC1,对水生非目标群落的浓度一般低于HC5),但对目标生物无效(对圆尾田鼠CBS 123929和褐毛田鼠CBS 110524的最大抑制水平分别为70%和50%)。结果还表明,在测试的速率下,在商业产品中添加其他配方会增强ai的作用。总体而言,本研究证实,基于对成分相互作用和对目标的实际功效的系统生态毒理学测试,商业产品可以在设计阶段进行优化。这可能是在向更可持续的农业生产过渡期间减少环境污染的宝贵途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecotoxicology
Ecotoxicology 环境科学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Ecotoxicology is an international journal devoted to the publication of fundamental research on the effects of toxic chemicals on populations, communities and terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems. It aims to elucidate mechanisms and processes whereby chemicals exert their effects on ecosystems and the impact caused at the population or community level. The journal is not biased with respect to taxon or biome, and papers that indicate possible new approaches to regulation and control of toxic chemicals and those aiding in formulating ways of conserving threatened species are particularly welcome. Studies on individuals should demonstrate linkage to population effects in clear and quantitative ways. Laboratory studies must show a clear linkage to specific field situations. The journal includes not only original research papers but technical notes and review articles, both invited and submitted. A strong, broadly based editorial board ensures as wide an international coverage as possible.
期刊最新文献
Investigating the toxicity of polylactic acid microplastics on the health and physiology of freshwater fish, Cirrhinus mrigala. Effects of aerial liming on soil chemical and biological properties in metal contaminated and inaccessible lands in Ontario (Canada). Phytotoxicity of single and mixed rare earth element (La, Nd and Sm) exposures on Lactuca sativa seed germination and growth. Stress biomarker response in Aporrectodea caliginosa earthworms exposed to single and combined pesticide treatments (Prosaro and Decis). Toxicodynamics of cadmium in the green mussel Perna viridis (Linnaeus, 1758) using bioenergetic and physiological biomarkers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1