Contrast Injection from an Intermediate Catheter Placed in an Intradural Artery is Associated with Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy following Neurointervention.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY American Journal of Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-03 DOI:10.3174/ajnr.A7944
M Fuga, T Tanaka, R Tachi, S Yamana, K Irie, I Kajiwara, A Teshigawara, T Ishibashi, Y Hasegawa, Y Murayama
{"title":"Contrast Injection from an Intermediate Catheter Placed in an Intradural Artery is Associated with Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy following Neurointervention.","authors":"M Fuga, T Tanaka, R Tachi, S Yamana, K Irie, I Kajiwara, A Teshigawara, T Ishibashi, Y Hasegawa, Y Murayama","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A7944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Contrast-induced encephalopathy can result from neurotoxicity of contrast medium in the affected area. The development of intermediate catheters has allowed guidance of catheters to more distal arteries. This study focused on the association between contrast-induced encephalopathy and contrast injection from an intermediate catheter guided into a distal intradural artery during neurointervention for cerebral aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 420 consecutive aneurysms in 396 patients who underwent neurointervention for extracranial aneurysms and unruptured intracranial aneurysms at our institution from February 2012 to January 2023. Patients were divided into a group with contrast-induced encephalopathy and a group without. To identify risk factors for contrast-induced encephalopathy, we compared clinical, anatomic, and procedural factors between groups by multivariate logistic regression analysis and stepwise selection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 396 patients who underwent neurointervention for cerebral aneurysms, 14 (3.5%) developed contrast-induced encephalopathy. Compared with the group without contrast-induced encephalopathy, the group with contrast-induced encephalopathy showed significantly higher rates of patients on hemodialysis, previously treated aneurysms, intradural placement of a catheter for angiography, nonionic contrast medium, and flow-diversion procedures in univariate analyses. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed intradural placement of a catheter for angiography (OR = 40.4; 95% CI, 8.63-189) and previously treated aneurysms (OR = 8.20; 95% CI, 2.26-29.6) as independent predictors of contrast-induced encephalopathy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contrast injection from an intradural artery and retreatment of recurrent aneurysms were major risk factors for contrast-induced encephalopathy. Attention should be paid to the location of the intermediate catheter for angiography to avoid developing contrast-induced encephalopathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7875,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494956/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7944","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Contrast-induced encephalopathy can result from neurotoxicity of contrast medium in the affected area. The development of intermediate catheters has allowed guidance of catheters to more distal arteries. This study focused on the association between contrast-induced encephalopathy and contrast injection from an intermediate catheter guided into a distal intradural artery during neurointervention for cerebral aneurysms.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 420 consecutive aneurysms in 396 patients who underwent neurointervention for extracranial aneurysms and unruptured intracranial aneurysms at our institution from February 2012 to January 2023. Patients were divided into a group with contrast-induced encephalopathy and a group without. To identify risk factors for contrast-induced encephalopathy, we compared clinical, anatomic, and procedural factors between groups by multivariate logistic regression analysis and stepwise selection.

Results: Among the 396 patients who underwent neurointervention for cerebral aneurysms, 14 (3.5%) developed contrast-induced encephalopathy. Compared with the group without contrast-induced encephalopathy, the group with contrast-induced encephalopathy showed significantly higher rates of patients on hemodialysis, previously treated aneurysms, intradural placement of a catheter for angiography, nonionic contrast medium, and flow-diversion procedures in univariate analyses. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed intradural placement of a catheter for angiography (OR = 40.4; 95% CI, 8.63-189) and previously treated aneurysms (OR = 8.20; 95% CI, 2.26-29.6) as independent predictors of contrast-induced encephalopathy.

Conclusions: Contrast injection from an intradural artery and retreatment of recurrent aneurysms were major risk factors for contrast-induced encephalopathy. Attention should be paid to the location of the intermediate catheter for angiography to avoid developing contrast-induced encephalopathy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
硬膜内动脉置入中间导管的造影剂注射与神经干预后造影剂诱导的脑病有关。
背景和目的:造影剂引起的脑病可由造影剂在受影响区域的神经毒性引起。中间导管的发展使导管能够引导到更多的远端动脉。本研究的重点是在脑动脉瘤的神经干预过程中,造影剂诱导的脑病与从中间导管引导到硬膜下远端动脉的造影剂注射之间的关系。材料和方法:我们回顾性分析了2012年2月至2023年1月在我院接受神经介入治疗的396名患者中的420个连续动脉瘤。患者被分为一组有造影剂诱导的脑病,另一组没有。为了确定造影剂诱导性脑病的危险因素,我们通过多变量逻辑回归分析和逐步选择比较了各组之间的临床、解剖和手术因素。结果:在396例接受脑动脉瘤神经介入治疗的患者中,14例(3.5%)出现造影剂诱导的脑病。在单变量分析中,与没有造影剂诱导性脑病的组相比,有造影剂诱导的脑病的组在血液透析、既往治疗过的动脉瘤、硬膜内放置导管进行血管造影术、非离子造影剂和分流手术中的患者率显着更高。逐步多变量逻辑回归分析显示,硬膜内放置导管进行血管造影术(OR=40.4;95%CI,8.63-189)和既往治疗过的动脉瘤(OR=8.20;95%CI,2.26-29.6)是造影剂诱发脑病的独立预测因素。结论:硬膜内动脉造影剂注射和复发性动脉瘤的再治疗是造影剂诱发脑病的主要危险因素。应注意血管造影术中间导管的位置,以避免发生造影剂诱导的脑病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.70%
发文量
506
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The mission of AJNR is to further knowledge in all aspects of neuroimaging, head and neck imaging, and spine imaging for neuroradiologists, radiologists, trainees, scientists, and associated professionals through print and/or electronic publication of quality peer-reviewed articles that lead to the highest standards in patient care, research, and education and to promote discussion of these and other issues through its electronic activities.
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence-Generated Editorials in Radiology: Can Expert Editors Detect Them? The many faces of myxopapillary ependynomas. Vestibular schwannoma-related increased labyrinthine post-gadolinium 3D-FLAIR signal intensity and association with hearing impairment. CNS Embryonal Tumor with PLAGL Amplification, a New Tumor Type in Children and Adolescents: Insights from a Comprehensive MRI Analysis. DSA Quantitative Analysis and Predictive Modeling of Obliteration in Cerebral AVM following Stereotactic Radiosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1