When 'cultures of care' meet: entanglements and accountabilities at the intersection of animal research and patient involvement in the UK.

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Social & Cultural Geography Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/14649365.2020.1814850
Richard Gorman, Gail Davies
{"title":"When 'cultures of care' meet: entanglements and accountabilities at the intersection of animal research and patient involvement in the UK.","authors":"Richard Gorman,&nbsp;Gail Davies","doi":"10.1080/14649365.2020.1814850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A good culture of care, empowering individuals within organisations to care and reflecting wider social expectations about care, is now a well-documented aspiration in managing practices of laboratory animal research and establishing priorities for patient and public health. However, there is little attention to how different institutional cultures of care interact and what happens to the accountabilities of caring roles and the entanglements of caring practices when institutional cultures meet. Drawing on research exploring the increasing practices of patient and public involvement (PPI) within animal research in the UK, we identify three ways in which cultures of care are changing in encounters between biomedical researchers and people affected by health conditions. Firstly, patient involvement in animal research brings additional bodies to <i>care for</i> within research facilities. Secondly, patient and public groups are seen as an increasingly important group to <i>convey a culture of care</i> to. Thirdly, involvement brings opportunities for patients and publics to <i>connect care</i> for both human and animals. However, more attention is required to understand how shifts towards cultures of care distribute power and responsibility to care within institutions and at their boundaries, where responsibilities to care may be disconnected from the power to effect meaningful changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48072,"journal":{"name":"Social & Cultural Geography","volume":"24 1","pages":"121-139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14649365.2020.1814850","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social & Cultural Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2020.1814850","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

A good culture of care, empowering individuals within organisations to care and reflecting wider social expectations about care, is now a well-documented aspiration in managing practices of laboratory animal research and establishing priorities for patient and public health. However, there is little attention to how different institutional cultures of care interact and what happens to the accountabilities of caring roles and the entanglements of caring practices when institutional cultures meet. Drawing on research exploring the increasing practices of patient and public involvement (PPI) within animal research in the UK, we identify three ways in which cultures of care are changing in encounters between biomedical researchers and people affected by health conditions. Firstly, patient involvement in animal research brings additional bodies to care for within research facilities. Secondly, patient and public groups are seen as an increasingly important group to convey a culture of care to. Thirdly, involvement brings opportunities for patients and publics to connect care for both human and animals. However, more attention is required to understand how shifts towards cultures of care distribute power and responsibility to care within institutions and at their boundaries, where responsibilities to care may be disconnected from the power to effect meaningful changes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当“关怀文化”相遇:英国动物研究和患者参与交叉的纠缠和责任。
一种良好的护理文化,使组织内的个人能够照顾并反映更广泛的社会对护理的期望,现在是管理实验动物研究实践和为患者和公共卫生确定优先事项的一种有据可查的愿望。然而,很少有人关注不同的机构文化如何相互作用,以及当机构文化相遇时,护理角色的责任和护理实践的纠缠会发生什么。借鉴研究探索患者和公众参与(PPI)在英国的动物研究中越来越多的做法,我们确定了三种方式,其中护理文化正在改变在生物医学研究人员和受健康状况影响的人之间的遭遇。首先,患者参与动物研究带来了研究设施内需要照顾的额外身体。其次,病人和公众群体被视为传达关怀文化的一个日益重要的群体。第三,参与为患者和公众提供了将人类和动物的护理联系起来的机会。然而,需要更多的注意力来了解向护理文化的转变如何在机构内部及其边界上分配护理的权力和责任,在这些机构中,护理的责任可能与实现有意义变革的权力脱节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
16.00%
发文量
99
期刊最新文献
‘Plastic addicts’: troubling consumer tropes in Thailand’s neoliberal waste environment Philosophy of the Tourist Visual disability in spatio-temporal assemblages: conceptualizing reference points from a non-pointillist perspective Negotiating trust in AI-enabled navigation technologies: imaginaries, ecologies, habits Temporalities of creativity in city-making: DIY urbanism in post-earthquake Christchurch
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1